Oh, fucker Carlson. Great opinion source. No facts, just inflammatory opinion. Just the fodder you guys need. Lol. Wow
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you ever offer any real arguments? "Buncha bullshit" is real convincing.What a buncha bullshit. Like arguing to keep Santa alive. It’s all bullshit. WTF. I cant believe people are this fucking stupid. Chrissakes
You should watch it. You might learn something.Oh, fucker Carlson. Great opinion source. No facts, just inflammatory opinion. Just the fodder you guys need. Lol. Wow
What a buncha bullshit. Like arguing to keep Santa alive. It’s all bullshit. WTF. I cant believe people are this fucking stupid. Chrissakes
You mean like the Russia collusion hoax?You’re convinced by the buncha bullshit. Why offer silly facts?
This conspiratorial shit show will end and normal people will continue their lives.
Take a look at your boy Dr. Scally's Trump thread above. That's not documenting an investigation. It's a fucking hoax. No honest thinking individual could believe or claim anything else.An investigation isn’t a conspiracy. You know this, right?
Texas IS America. I spent 28 yrs of nanny state rule in NY. So glad to have spent the last 7 yrs down here in TX. As they say, so goes Texas so goes America.View attachment 139145
![]()
Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules
Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court before midnight on Monday challenging election results in four other states.www.breitbart.com
It’s a GOOD Tuesday morning. Thank you Texas. They found a simple way to go straight to the Supreme Court. They’re also very specific in what they are asking the Court to rule on.
Honestly the stupidity here is really disappointing. I’ve lost huge faith in humanity knowing there’s this large a percentage of complete dumbasses out there.
Even the supposedly right leaning WSJ is ignoring it. Its top election story is "Conservative Lawsuits Fuel Distrust of Election Results".Lol. No news. Texas sues 4 states at the Supreme Court level. Nothing BIG or anything. Shit like that happens everyday right? CNN web coverage is covid covid covid. Scare scare scare. Distract distract distract. Fucking unreal.
This is about constitutional rights.
https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf?utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_name=&utm_source=govdelivery&utm_term=
Over the years I've come to accept that I have no chance of predicting how SCOTUS will rule on something. Seems like the more important it is politically the more likely the court is to interpret it in a way no one on either side would have guessed.The actual court filing, if anyone is interested.
Code:https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/images/admin/2020/Press/SCOTUSFiling.pdf?utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_name=&utm_source=govdelivery&utm_term=
Much of it seems pretty specious from a quick perusal, but with a majority of conservative-leaning judges in the SCOTUS, who knows? The challenge regarding non-legislative powers influencing voting laws and whether that violated the Elections Clause of the Constitution is going to be the most relevant bit to watch.
An important thing to note is that the lawsuit got a direct track to the SCOTUS because it contains a constitutional challenge, not because it's necessarily a strong case. It could very well be a strong case, but a fast track to the Supreme Court doesn't implicitly imply that.
My prediction is they will rule the election unconstitutional. Then theyll have to follow the pathways the founding fathers had in place for such an eventOver the years I've come to accept that I have no chance of predicting how SCOTUS will rule on something. Seems like the more important it is politically the more likely the court is to interpret it in a way no one on either side would have guessed.
Pretty much. Sometimes their rulings are a bit strange.Over the years I've come to accept that I have no chance of predicting how SCOTUS will rule on something. Seems like the more important it is politically the more likely the court is to interpret it in a way no one on either side would have guessed.
Id like to see election reform. I dont want all this big money in politics. I dont care for lobbyists or special interest being able to throw billions of dollars at a candidate of their choosing. Id also like to see term limits for politicians. Any person who can make a career out of the most inhospitable place on the planet is by design a psychopath/sociopathPretty much. Sometimes their rulings are a bit strange.
Citizens United v. FEC comes to mind. The SCOTUS basically turned politics into a pay-to-play system by ruling that political donations are somehow "free speech."
