Slowww
Member
Say it louder and maybe it will make your face prettierChad in slums of mumbai maybe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Say it louder and maybe it will make your face prettierChad in slums of mumbai maybe
I would start between 300-400 and get as much out of this first cycle as possible. Slow and Steady wins this race. I wish I would have squeezed out more gains at a younger age and lower doses. You can always go up, but going back down is a mind fuckIm looking to hop on test p only for my first cycle. I know doing daily pins is optimal to prevent estrogen side effects and I'll keep my AI on hand. I want to know how do I determine what my first dose should be for my test cycle. Basically because I want to blast for muscle gains I've read everywhere it should be a 300-500mg per week test cycle.
If you leave nine people less informed and pushed away from harm reduction for every one that you successfully persuade against, I'd argue that that's less ethical. If they're asking on whether or not they should start, that's different.i half agree with your statement, but i think the other half is a bit pessimistic.
SO MANY of the youngsters looking to hop on are addressing a completely different issue than a physique. they're looking for a personality, confidence, women, attention, manliness, etc.
and while im sure these compounds can assist with all of those things, its definitely not a great route to take to get there.
young people wanting to compete? different story. young people wanting to use their body to make money somehow? different story.
but young people wanting to address clear personality, emotional or mental issues with these compounds? imo a finger wag is the only truly ethical course of action. if there is a non zero chance that someone can be swayed from injecting rgk oil in favor of introspection and self-determination, i think you should always take that route.
Either way, he’s banned now, and rightfully so.If you leave nine people less informed and pushed away from harm reduction for every one that you successfully persuade against, I'd argue that that's less ethical. If they're asking on whether or not they should start, that's different.
What somebody's motive for using steroids is is largely irrelevant. That's nobody's business but theirs. Again, no purpose is more just than another. We wouldn't say that people using meth for 'cognitive enhancement' are more just in their use than the people abusing it for euphoria.
We aren't here to police people's decisions, we're here to educate them on the potential consequences of those decisions, and how to mitigate them if they decide to go forward with it anyway. If people truly want to discourage somebody from starting, their response would be effortful and educational, not the typical, "you're too young" or "you're stupid" or (insert any fear mongering comment).
