Mrgiuoco
New Member
Hey guys, do you do the classic ego lift till failure every set or the “science” way?
For people juicing
For people juicing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
training to failure and ego lifting are not the same thing.
The “science” way shows hypertrophy is related to proximity to failure.
to failure IS the science way.Hey guys, do you do the classic ego lift till failure every set or the “science” way?
For people juicing
WISDOMtraining to failure and ego lifting are not the same thing.
The “science” way shows hypertrophy is related to proximity to failure. Train to failure OF THE MUSCLE not the movement.
The “science” way shows hypertrophy is related to proximity to failure. Train to failure OF THE MUSCLE not the movement.
Your article on this was interesting. It is unfortunate with the troll but you should consider reposting for better discussionto failure IS the science way.
If @Millard wants to clear it and repost it I'm happy to restart that discussion.Your article on this was interesting. It is unfortunate with the troll but you should consider reposting for better discussion
@Millard I believe it the quality of the article, from personal perspective and beliefs, would be beneficial to have a separate thread from the banned person that broke the discussion. I don't say I agree with everything but it is great for discussion.If @Millard wants to clear it and repost it I'm happy to restart that discussion.
But I'm not going to double post without an okay first.
I get hard from a good training discussion so I'm all for starting that discussion up again
Failure does not mean light weight. It means weight heavy enough to fail in “bodybuilding” rep ranges (6-15 generally) but that you can control and focus on the working muscle.So basically it's always better to do more sets with a lower weight to failure instead of doing heavy weight with a bad posture to failure?
What is beneficial to adding more volume?By staying anywhere from 1 to 5 reps from failure, you should be able to recover faster and thus add more volume. If your doing PPL I would highly suggest trying this. If you're going to failure on most sets and doing PPL in my experience it's only a matter of time before you burn out. You can still train hard af without going all the way to failure. If you can't get another rep while keeping perfect form, stop there. Just my opinion.
Valid point. It does take experience to know where failure is for you. And why add more volume? Because you will get bigger.What is beneficial to adding more volume?
Not getting another rep while keeping perfect form is the definition of failure for most. But you need to be honest with yourself and know what failure feels like.
Valid point. It does take experience to know where failure is for you. And why add more volume? Because you will get bigger.
I appreciate your input. I do have to disagree when you say volume is more fatiguing. In my opinion intensity is far more fatiguing. I've tried many styles of training and HIT type training is far more fatiguing even though you do less volume. However I am over 40 so my recovery is far inferior to a younger guy, so that's definitely a factor. At the end of the day most training works to some degree, especially with gear in the mix. For myself, stopping short of failure (yes, RIR training) is FAR more effective and I feel better physically on a day to day basis.Not according to the current data.
Most people would agree that volume is far more fatiguing than intensity.
If you assume the last 5 reps to failure are the main hypertrophy driving reps:
3 sets of 15 reps taken to failure would equate to 15 quality, hypertrophy driving reps (the last 5 reps from each set)
If you choose to stop 2 reps prior to failure, 3 sets of 15 would only be 9 hypertrophy driving reps (3 from each set) to make up for this disparity you would need to do 5 sets of 15 two reps shy of failure to get the same 15 quality reps.
Which is more fatiguing? The 3 sets taken to failure? Or the 5 sets taken to almost failure?
Volume is far more fatiguing than intensity and will only have a negative impact on recovery time as opposed to keeping volume moderate and intensity high with training to failure.
