Oh the irony.

I just get aggravated with dumbasses. There’s a difference in championing something and explaining what it is and isn’t.
I never claimed or even hinted at being a staunch socialist. Strict socialism is as bad as strict capitalism.
You’re an idiot. I voted for Jo Jorgensen.
I’m lucky enough to have a ton of free time on my hands. I’m lucky that I can afford to.
I was given an opportunity and took advantage of it.
You have to work your ass off to make ends meet and that sucks for you that you can’t fathom being able to enjoy life and not have to work your days away in order to live. Like I said I work around 15 maybe 20hours including drive time when I have to be on site to check on things. I travel every once in a while if there’s a big storm somewhere. I was in Long Island last year for a month.
I literally don’t do anything other than work besides play video games and go to the gym. If I’m on site it’s maybe an hour each one.
You don’t know what you think you know.

Yawwwwn....

You're too concerned with what other people on this site think of you to be what you actually claim to be. Also, people who make very good money don't go around degrading others for having less resources. That's one of several ways where you give yourself away.

Next time don't try too hard.
 
Again, name countries where socialism has been successful. I can name countries that tried it and that thankfully rejected it after they saw what a complete failure it created.

According to dictionary.com here are the three accepted definitions of the term socialism:

socialism​

[ soh-shuh-liz-uhm ]SHOW IPA


See synonyms for socialism on Thesaurus.com

noun
1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, capital, land, etc., by the community as a whole, usually through a centralized government.
2. procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3. (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

You'll see that it's a "theory" which when actually practiced never works.

Look up the word capitalism and you'll see it clearly defined as a system; not a "theory."

If it were so great as you claim it to be then why don't all first tier countries throughout the world adopt this "theory" and put it into practice?
Which countries tried it and rejected it?
 
The government took control of all privately owned businesses in those countries?
 
The Soviets have practiced rather extreme socialism and that really didn't work, and the USA so far is still capitalistic with some socialism...for now at least.
 
Go figure that a libertarian group funded by corporate donations that lobbies for public policy on behalf of large corporations would be against socialist policies…
 
So those countries were never socialist, they had turned that direction but reversed course
 
China hasn't been brought up yet, they're as government controlled as you get? Uruguay has considered itself socialist for a long time now
 
Last edited:
China hasn't been brought up yet, they're as government controlled as you get? Uruguay has considered itself socialist for a long time now
Uruguay may have a socialist party but they are not socialist. Not sure if you're implying that Uruguay is a socialist success but I wouldn't consider a country with a miniscule population of 3.5M to be an example of how well socialism can endure. I've lived in cities where the population of the town alone was close to that number. It's barely a third of the population of NYC.

Look at the more densely populated areas throughout the world where socialism always fails for obvious reasons. You try to use a an example like Uruguay which really doesn't apply since it's the second wealthiest nation in South America due to its very successful exportation economy. Both factors synergistically feed off of one another. Booming exportation business + small population = highest GDP per capita for all of South America. Uruguay's success has nothing to do with socialism. Look at Venezuela for a more concise example of how socialism fails. At best, Uruguay is a mixed economy but they only became successful, in the first place, by capitalistic means.
 
And Uruguay doesn't count because it has a booming export economy? I guess China doesn't count either since it makes so much money on exports
 
Go figure that a libertarian group funded by corporate donations that lobbies for public policy on behalf of large corporations would be against socialist policies…

You've established a fallacious pattern of trying to dismantle people's viewpoints that don't align with your own simply for not being a socialism funded source. Well, what pro-socialist organization is actually going to admit to socialism failing? How foolish can you be?

And what's wrong with being libertarian? Is that evil in your eyes, too?

Dude, the more you bicker the more you reveal what a staunch socialist you are.
 
You've established a fallacious pattern of trying to dismantle people's viewpoints that don't align with your own simply for not being a socialism funded source. Well, what pro-socialist organization is actually going to admit to socialism failing? How foolish can you be?

And what's wrong with being libertarian? Is that evil in your eyes, too?

Dude, the more you bicker the more you reveal what a staunch socialist you are.

I voted conservative in our last election, but please do carry on with your armchair psychology. I enjoy watching you be wrong and laughing at your knee-jerk, poorly constructed interpretations of my comments.

I didn’t say that there was anything wrong with being a libertarian, Goober. How did you even take that from what I said? I implied that it’s a forgone conclusion that a libertarian think-tank funded by corporate donations will have a problem with socialism. Just like an article written by a trade union leader would almost certainly be critical of deregulation of labor laws.

My point was, since you don’t seem to get subtlety, that articles written by groups with a vested interest in a particular conclusion are highly suspect and need to be taken with a shaker of salt.
 
And Uruguay doesn't count because it has a booming export economy? I guess China doesn't count either since it makes so much money on exports

Dude, for being such a tiny country in comparison Uruguay has a GDP 1.5 times higher than China's. The only reason China's export business is comparable is due to the fact the world outsources their products to be made there due to cheap labor. They're a shithole and they make crap that doesn't last.

Nice try. Speaking of China, does anyone remember the chain of suicides that made headlines due to workers assembling your gadgets like smartphones, etc were being worked to death in what are basically concentration camp like settings?

Life and death in Apple’s forbidden city

^ Hate to break it to you but you won't be able to dismiss that source since it's not a right-wing conservative funded site. Just letting you know beforehand.
 
My point was, since you don’t seem to get subtlety, that articles written by groups with a vested interest in a particular conclusion are highly suspect and need to be taken with a shaker of salt.

Everyone has an agenda. Whether it's considered good or bad, some of us are more transparent and honest about it than others.
 
Dude, for being such a tiny country in comparison Uruguay has a GDP 1.5 times higher than China's. The only reason China's export business is comparable is due to the fact the world outsources their products to be made there due to cheap labor. They're a shithole and they make crap that doesn't last.

Nice try. Speaking of China, does anyone remember the chain of suicides that made headlines due to workers assembling your gadgets like smartphones, etc were being worked to death in what are basically concentration camp like settings?

Life and death in Apple’s forbidden city

^ Hate to break it to you but you won't be able to dismiss that source since it's not a right-wing conservative funded site. Just letting you know beforehand.
Interesting thing about foxcon is that for the amount of people they employ the actual suicide rates aren’t all that significant.
 
Back
Top