any-name-you-wish
New Member
No letters yet for anything in February from the 3 or 4 people I saw comment.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Community Review: IndiaMart Ancillaries
- Thread starter Kralteramon
- Start date
Superchicken
Member
I stick with it only because I’ve already had dextran as multiple infusions and know I do well with it.
The ferric carboxy has the highest risk of hypophosphataemia than other forms, and it’s harder to treat than traditional. I’m in an iron group, and I know that skews perception, but there are so many stories of people suffering longterm. I’ve read that a lot of medical sites have moved away from it as first choice because of the risk, and that they have multiple injury lawsuits.
I remember you were doing the pig iron. Are you using these others IM or IV? I don’t have IV experience, so that limits my choices, too. Maybe I’ll try it, can’t be that hard and I have good veins.
What ninja skills did you use to figure this out? Sharvik responded faster than De Mega. I wonder if they’re handled by different sales teams.
Photon
Member
which has the lowest risk of anything?
i use Gleptoferron, it's not even approved in humans lol. it is designed to stain less in pigs vs iron dextran because nobody wants to buy bloodied meat. i pin it IM 1.5in DG. I was considering to get the newer ones (should be better right?) but was wondering why people were sticking to dextran.
he has all of them on speed dial at this point
should probably organize a groupbuy using his name
Last edited:
bananafeet
Member
Maybe hire a rouge nurse? You probably need a drip bag and sterile water for dilution. Have any nurse friends? Here in Australia the GP sends you to hospital for low iron and they do it. There can be complications like nausea and skin colouration. I'm getting shudders as I have flashbacks remembering someone close to me go through it post partum.
@GreatOak did the original detective work. I had it confirmed when De Mega gave me Sharvik's WhatsApp number and bank account as his own.
Post in thread 'Community Review: IndiaMart Ancillaries'
Photon
Member
Eplerenone and Finerenone are both of the same class - MRA. The difference is that Fin is more selective, has lower risk of elevated K, lowers BP less and has stronger anti fibrotic activity. EP has only been evaluated for HF whereas Fin is evaluated for HF and CKD w T2D. As such, studies on the impact of EP on CKD is scarce.
Dapagliflozin is a SGLT2 and well, these are known to slow down progression of CKD. There are studies that show that EP is better for CKD, but with the added risk of higher K.
Albuminuria-Lowering Effect of Dapagliflozin, Eplerenone, and Their Combination in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial - PMC
In this randomized crossover clinical trial in patients with CKD with and without type 2 diabetes, we assessed the albuminuria-lowering effect of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin and mineralocorticoid receptor ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
But then you also have studies that show it's indifferent from RAS (ARB/CCB).
Since it's not evaluated for treatment of CKD, we will never know.
Personally I see an increase in K or a decrease in BP as unwanted sides -- what we want is something kidney focused.
This seems to be more gout related. My uric acid is low, i believe it might be due to reta so I'm not entirely sure about uric acid related stuff.
I take this, but i don't think it helps kidneys at all. I didn't see any noticiable benefits to kidney markers. I take it as it's the only medication that improves RBC deformability.
I believe the best benefit is probably from SGLT2 + Fin.
And for those who want more natural options, you have
Astragaloside IV (poor oral bioavability tho - i'm working on an injectable)
Astragalus 70% extract
Urolithin A
Last edited:
BALLISTIC
Member
Thanks man, it's like a love hate relationship with you. Haha You send me down rabbit holes for nights on end. But seriously I appreciate it always.View attachment 381673
Eplerenone and Finerenone are both of the same class - MRA. The difference is that Fin is more selective, has lower risk of elevated K, lowers BP less and has stronger anti fibrotic activity. EP has only been evaluated for HF whereas Fin is evaluated for HF and CKD w T2D. As such, studies on the impact of EP on CKD is scarce.
Dapagliflozin is a SGLT2 and well, these are known to slow down progression of CKD. There are studies that show that EP is better for CKD, but with the added risk of higher K.
View attachment 381674
Albuminuria-Lowering Effect of Dapagliflozin, Eplerenone, and Their Combination in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial - PMC
In this randomized crossover clinical trial in patients with CKD with and without type 2 diabetes, we assessed the albuminuria-lowering effect of the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin and mineralocorticoid receptor ...
But then you also have studies that show it's indifferent from RAS (ARB/CCB).
View attachment 381675
Since it's not evaluated for treatment of CKD, we will never know.
Personally I see an increase in K or a decrease in BP as unwanted sides -- what we want is something kidney focused.
This seems to be more gout related. My uric acid is low, i believe it might be due to reta so I'm not entirely sure about uric acid related stuff.
I take this, but i don't think it helps kidneys at all. I didn't see any noticiable benefits to kidney markers. I take it as it's the only medication that improves RBC deformability.
I believe the best benefit is probably SGLT2 + Fin.
And for those who want more natural options, you have
Astragaloside IV (poor oral bioavability tho - i'm working on an injectable)
Astragalus 70% extract
Urolithin A
I've found it on India Mart I'll ask for some quotes. Bayer Zydus 10/20mg, Sun Pharma 20mg.
Edit: when you get a chance DM @Cman90 he's got a question you can answer in more detail.
Superchicken
Member
If I didn’t have autoimmune stuff I’d be less risk averse. I wonder if that’s why so many women have higher rate of incidence since we tend to have more autoimmune disorders.which has the lowest risk of anything?
I assume because it’s cheaper maybe? The newer ones are def more convenient, and can be given at higher doses nor require as many injx. The other one you showed and sucrose are popular in the iron group. Depending on how IM dextran goes, I might switch if the increase isn’t significant enough.
After my comment, I searched the internet and saw multiple stories of nurses being given no instruction and just being told to figure it out.
Seems about right for American healthcare. I’ve had multiple infusions without issue, and mine wasn’t get diluted. It’s strange watching sludge go in. I forgot I have an aunt who would probably be willing to help, good idea.
BALLISTIC
Member
For those interested in peptides, especially the nootropic side of things...
@bananafeet mentioned it earlier that most of these “nootropic peptides” are honestly garbage. In general he says they hit the lab floor and we're left where they belong.
In my opinion, NAD+ has been excellent for me at 100–150mg IM. Lower doses proved pretty lackluster. But be warned 100mgb to 150 makes you feel like your getting pushed off a cliff but someone grabs your shirt last second. Haha
With that said… for those curious about actually improving cognition.
True nootropics exist, and they’ve been around for decades. We all want stronger muscles, but personally I want my brain muscle to be my strongest.
Piracetam = Nootropic (Not a Stimulant)
Piracetam is a true nootropic, meaning it helps your brain work better without stimulating your nervous system like caffeine or Adderall.
What it does...
Helps brain cells communicate more efficiently while improving memory + recall.
Reduces mental fatigue we all feel at times.
Increases oxygen & glucose use in the brain and supports learning & neuroplasticity.
What you may notice:
Clearer thinking
Easier word recall
Better retention when studying
Less brain fog
More mental stamina
I know many of you go for Modafinil or Armodafinil, and they’re great for energy (I enjoy them on occasion too).
But Piracetam works differently it improves Neuron Membrane Fluidity. Makes brain cell membranes more flexible so electrical signals pass between neurons easier.
Better communication between brain cells Improved recall + processing. Enhances Mitochondrial Efficiency. It works by improving how neurons use oxygen and glucose to make ATP (energy).
This one is big... It improves Cerebral Micro-circulation, Increasing red blood cell flexibility to improve blood flow through small brain capillaries.
Better oxygen + nutrient delivery to brain tissue, supports Neuroplasticity and, enhances acetylcholine receptor sensitivity and synaptic adaptability.
Faster learning
Better memory formation
It's available in tablets, and my choice injectable.
Please take this as anecdotal only. But I read books quite often. I feel like I read faster, retain almost everything.
I didn't want to mention until I thoroughly experienced for myself. I know I'm only one person and most may not have heard if this med ever.
Anyway if I ever come across one offs and think they're worth mentioning you gents will know.
@bananafeet mentioned it earlier that most of these “nootropic peptides” are honestly garbage. In general he says they hit the lab floor and we're left where they belong.
In my opinion, NAD+ has been excellent for me at 100–150mg IM. Lower doses proved pretty lackluster. But be warned 100mgb to 150 makes you feel like your getting pushed off a cliff but someone grabs your shirt last second. Haha
With that said… for those curious about actually improving cognition.
True nootropics exist, and they’ve been around for decades. We all want stronger muscles, but personally I want my brain muscle to be my strongest.
Piracetam = Nootropic (Not a Stimulant)
Piracetam is a true nootropic, meaning it helps your brain work better without stimulating your nervous system like caffeine or Adderall.
What it does...
Helps brain cells communicate more efficiently while improving memory + recall.
Reduces mental fatigue we all feel at times.
Increases oxygen & glucose use in the brain and supports learning & neuroplasticity.
What you may notice:
Clearer thinking
Easier word recall
Better retention when studying
Less brain fog
More mental stamina
I know many of you go for Modafinil or Armodafinil, and they’re great for energy (I enjoy them on occasion too).
But Piracetam works differently it improves Neuron Membrane Fluidity. Makes brain cell membranes more flexible so electrical signals pass between neurons easier.
Better communication between brain cells Improved recall + processing. Enhances Mitochondrial Efficiency. It works by improving how neurons use oxygen and glucose to make ATP (energy).
This one is big... It improves Cerebral Micro-circulation, Increasing red blood cell flexibility to improve blood flow through small brain capillaries.
Better oxygen + nutrient delivery to brain tissue, supports Neuroplasticity and, enhances acetylcholine receptor sensitivity and synaptic adaptability.
Faster learning
Better memory formation
It's available in tablets, and my choice injectable.
Please take this as anecdotal only. But I read books quite often. I feel like I read faster, retain almost everything.
I didn't want to mention until I thoroughly experienced for myself. I know I'm only one person and most may not have heard if this med ever.
Anyway if I ever come across one offs and think they're worth mentioning you gents will know.
Last edited:
bananafeet
Member
Ok bro that does sound like something cynical that I'd say haha
I'll give it a whirl since I respect your judgement.
Does it make one less homicidal on tren (asking for a mate)?
BALLISTIC
Member
If it makes us better friends the answer is yes. But also as a good friend I feel compelled to say... I don't think anything will help your Starbucks Tren.
bananafeet
Member
You should try something concrete. Try to learn something you couldn't before. Like a new language or calculus.
Just an idea. Maybe it increases self confidence not actual outcomes.
bananafeet
Member
I only say this because Prof Susan Davis looked into testosterone for women for brain fog and cognitive effects.
The women on it swore they were better but the cognitive tests they did showed zero difference.
Lines up with all the women on testosterone who think it's great for them when objectively it's not doing much good. It's the confidence boost. Probably the DHT derived neurosteroids.
