ANYONE RENT Micheal Moores 9/11 movie?

natasmi

New Member
Some of it was propaganda but also alot of facts.I don't like Bush or Kerry I lean more libertarian(less government)But we the freeare only allowed to choose from 2 canidates.Only 2 canidates at debates what a fukin joke.Anyway the movie was just okay but you will learn some shit they dont talk about in the mainstream media.
 
natasmi said:
Some of it was propaganda but also alot of facts.I don't like Bush or Kerry I lean more libertarian(less government)But we the freeare only allowed to choose from 2 canidates.Only 2 canidates at debates what a fukin joke.Anyway the movie was just okay but you will learn some shit they dont talk about in the mainstream media.

Nope...Have you seen Fahrenhype 9/11?


fahrenhype.gif
 
Last edited:
jbiggs said:
Nope...Have you seen Fahrenhype 9/11?

L139139.gif
NO but I would gladly watch that too.I don't believe on following party lines so I would watch something that bashes moore,I like to think for myself and I think one must hear all sides before one can make a sage decision.
 
I would never pay to watch any of his garbage. when it comes on HBO or something I might watch it if I can stand the BS. I too lean more toward the libertarian party and it would be nice to here them in the debates, but I'll do what I have to to keep a military bashing liberal out of the White House. I vote libertarian in most local elections...........11
 
natasmi said:
NO but I would gladly watch that too.I don't believe on following party lines so I would watch something that bashes moore,I like to think for myself and I think one must hear all sides before one can make a sage decision.

Both sides are SPIN, but I just think when you use spin, clever editing, and half-truths to put down an administration and claim it to be a "documentery" it's just wrong!
 
being anit-bush i thought i'd enjoy the movie more but i didn't find it to be all that fantastic. brought up some interesting points but nothing that he couldn't have written in a 3-5page colum in newsweek or time. the one thing i did take away from the movie was the horror of war and the fact that bush did lead many young americans into a war that seems to better his political carrer then the safeguarding of our country. as far as calling it a documentry that's very loosely useing the term. all the editing tricks and taking lil sound bites out of context is rather sleezy but some things shouldn't be ingored like allowing binladns family to leave the country. no need for editing there to make it look bad for bush.
 
Last edited:
jbiggs said:
Both sides are SPIN, but I just think when you use spin, clever editing, and half-truths to put down an administration and claim it to be a "documentery" it's just wrong!
Hey don't get me wrong, I don't like that fukin liberal moore . also ain't into the Hanoi Janes either.I suppurt our troops all the way!I am just into conspiracy theories for years that is more the angle I was coming from.If all we are told on tv and news is the whole truth the way they want us to see it, then we are truly screwed.
 
Frosty said:
The war betters his political career? Heh, that's a good one.

Tell you what, since you don't think he's safe-guarding our country, then why don't you lobby to get Saddam put back in power?


I own 9/11 and am intending on atleast viewing Farehhype. I think its funny that all of you sheep will drop the coin to watch farenhype cus it reinforces your biased belief about GWB, but arent interested in seeing the other side . Basically a " dont confuse me with the facts, i've already made up my mind " mentality. Congratulations.
 
Quasimoto said:
I own 9/11 and am intending on atleast viewing Farehhype. I think its funny that all of you sheep will drop the coin to watch farenhype cus it reinforces your biased belief about GWB, but arent interested in seeing the other side . Basically a " dont confuse me with the facts, i've already made up my mind " mentality. Congratulations.

Quasi, that wasn't my point. I said they are both SPIN. I just have a problem with using spin, clever editing, and half-truths to put down an administration it's just wrong.

I haven't seen either and don't plan on seeing either. I have read enough about both to make an informed decision.
 
you couldnt have said it better Q. Please Please dont tell me the facts!! Saddam had WMDs!!! right? right?....oh shit he never did really have them. damn....a little error in judgement huh W?
 
btw jbiggs....i like your avatar and am assuming you are ukrainian. so i hope that u know all the BS that bush sr and W have done to ukraine.
 
Frosty said:
Earth to Alphamale, EVERYONE thought he had WMD. Everyone's intelligence said the same thing, and everyone viewed the same intelligence. Even Saddam's own people thought he had WMD with the training in the chemicals suits and all. It wasn't an error in judgement...it was an error in intelligence.

besides, when a criminal pretends to pull a gun on a cop and gets shot IT'S NOT THE COPS FAULT.

The weapons inspectors didnt think so , the UN didnt think so, I personally never thought so ...the intel from the beginning was suspect Frosty. You take a better safe than sorry attitude, and we find were not better after all, are we sorry ? I am , i am sorry for unecessary american deaths on sept 11 , the unnecessary military death , the unecesary casualties of Shock and Awe , and i am sorry that we havent gotten the fuckers responsible for 9/11.

Frosty why not serve your country by enlisting, instead of arguing GWB talking points with a bunch of dudes here ? Serve your country in that way too....Your government is going to make sure that pony tail on the back of your head doesnt stay there. Want Proof ?

You guys love using this site as a media outlet, so i will show you what your GWB has in store for you...

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/6/24/104815.shtml
 
Alphamale23 said:
btw jbiggs....i like your avatar and am assuming you are ukrainian. so i hope that u know all the BS that bush sr and W have done to ukraine.

I have Ukranian roots along ways back, but I have a Non-Profit Org and small business that does work over there.

As to the "BS" you are speaking of, not sure what you are talking about here. Kuchma was allowed to run amok during the Clinton years and the country paid for it. Only by moving closer to democracy will Ukraine make advances. By the way Ukraine has troops on the ground in Iraq.
 
Frosty said:
Earth to Alphamale, EVERYONE thought he had WMD. Everyone's intelligence said the same thing, and everyone viewed the same intelligence. Even Saddam's own people thought he had WMD with the training in the chemicals suits and all. It wasn't an error in judgement...it was an error in intelligence.

besides, when a criminal pretends to pull a gun on a cop and gets shot IT'S NOT THE COPS FAULT.


just saw an interview on CNN....yes I watch it too to see how biased they are.

anyway....it was a dem woman arguing AGAIN that Bush lied to us about WMD...blah blah blah. The other lady on the interview explained to her about the intel from dozens of other intel agencies and what Clinton and Gore and Kerry/Edwards even said about Saddam having them.

The dem said "yeah yeah, whenever the republicans get cornered about their candidate being dishonest, they go and bring in Clinton and Gore. Give me a break."


bwahahahahahaha she was one of those feminist liberal dems speaking for the group Women for Kerry or somethin similar to that.


The absolute LAST line of defense for anyone against Bush is that "he lied to us and now over 100 Americans died and we invaded a country needlessly". This is the last thing they can defend. It doesnt matter how you explain it to people that the entire world thought he had them, they will never change their mind or see the whole picture.
 
hahaha frosty u make me laugh. "EVERYONE thought he had WMD" hahaha. wow. thats why we had "real allies" right? thats why so many countries told us NOT to invade right? just keep your eyes and ears closed and watch fox news. remember....FACTS ARE EVIL!!
 
first of all...it is not 100 lives lost it is well over 1000. and another thing....lying about a reason to invade a country to get oil is NOT exactly a small thing.
 
Alphamale23 said:
first of all...it is not 100 lives lost it is well over 1000. and another thing....lying about a reason to invade a country to get oil is NOT exactly a small thing.

Come on Alpha, turn off the Fahrenheit 9/11 loop.

Just about every intel agency around the world thought he had them. A report mentioned earlier says he had every intention of getting them.

The oil thing makes me laugh. Not one dime of Iraqi oil is going to the US. I actually think some should to cover the cost of the war...but so be it. All the profit is going towards rebuilding Iraq.
 
Back
Top