Type-IIx
Member
This is all true but so is the statement that per-mg and per-$, semaglutide is more potent at suppressing appetite than tirzepatide, retatrutide, and cagrilinitide.It's not universally true. Your experience is very cool, but that's not what most people report. What you describe is not what I experienced, and not what the person I was replying to seems to have experienced. Did Reta affect appetite? Sure, I was a little less interested in food. "I could eat, or not, whatever." With Tirz it felt like "There is no fucking way I'm touching that food."
There's a reason people are buying Cagri, and why Chase Irons is selling a Reta/Cagri stack. Enough people don't experience significant appetite suppression on Reta alone that there's a market for an "upgrade".
Everybody's got a different response to every drug, YMMV, et cetera. Some people have paradoxical reactions to drugs completely opposite to what the majority experience.
The Reta study showed greater % body weight loss on average than Sema or Tirz, so clearly it works for large populations regardless of appetite control potential. But it may be that there are people with eating patterns so disordered that it's not the best fit for them. Hell, his binge eating may be so deeply wired that no appetite suppressant will help because it's not appetite driven. I don't know, I'm just a dog on the internet.
Those drugs are better for blood glucose management.
Of course, still, exceptions exist because of individual drug response. We’re not talking basic math here, unlike HOMA-IR, and why you don’t need to get it calculated to calculate it yourself
