Spaceman Spiff
Subscriber
My bad
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Lobster HGH no vacuum - fridge vs no fridge test
- Thread starter Sampei
- Start date
Spaceman Spiff
Subscriber
I guess there Turkish people know about making hgh.
There is more to the country than cosmetic surgeries, kebabs, and rugs
There is more to the country than cosmetic surgeries, kebabs, and rugs
dinfar1337
New Member
yes
seems like fridge vs no fridge has become more the experiment than vacuum vs no vacuum when you look at it overall. but no fridge has just made the degradation faster and shown the difference.
what it shows; you probably shouldnt care too much under 5 years with no fridge and shouldn't care for it under 20+ years as long as you have +95% hgh + fridge with that stastical difference. thats atleast how im reading it
AlexDavis43
Member
I'm reading it as: they're all the same
Less than one percentage point difference is well within the margin of error
C & D are replicates and the difference between C & D is bigger than any other comparison in these data
dinfar1337
New Member
i hope my lines can make it more obvious. 3.64 is the only irregular and is to be ignored.
everything was pretty much the same besides no vacuum no fridge
Attachments
AlexDavis43
Member
The difference between fridge + vacuum and no fridge + no vacuum is 0.92
The difference between C and D is 0.96
In a lab setting this would put 0.96 as the baseline (like when you press tare on a scale); anything smaller than 0.96 is effectively zero
Last edited:
Purity:
No sig difference between groups.
Dimer+:
One or more groups are sig different but not in the trend you would expect.
Seems more like an analysis of Jano's method precision with this particular measurement. Makes no sense for other groups to have lower "dimer+" than control.
Caveat: n=2 for each group. No obvious outliers to throw out.
dinfar1337
New Member
seems like detection issues but no worries in those amounts.
thanks for your analysis.
i was just comparing higher mg amount >= lower purity vs lower mg amount >= higher purity but we end up getting pretty much the same. so i was thinking lobster manufacturing proccess at c and d making it a irregurlar and adding a dick to it
Yep, just stating the obvious statistical results. Significance vs practical importance.
dinfar1337
New Member
maybe you can make same model for
baseline >=3.41mg
no vacuum no fridge =<3.31mg
purity fridge & no fridge + vacuum = avg +- variance (-) no vacuum no fridge = avg +- variance
avg +- variance in = baseline mg - no vacuum no fridge (+) purity baseline - purity no vacuum no fridge.
and * with 10 or 20 to get 5 or 10 years ahead from 6 months difference.
Good point on the mg amount for sample C. That might qualify for outlier Q test but too lazy to do it. Good eye and very perceptive. I just ran the purity and dimer+ columns.
I'm good.
dinfar1337
New Member
its just simple catch.I'm good.
the purity scaling lower in % + less mg content im uncertain if will be non linear or linear.
im also too lazy so i will drop it haha.
at the top of my head it will be around 1iu drop every 3 years no vacuum no fridge.
We are just talking to each other. Nice chatting.
The dimer+ results have me scratching my head so not much point (in my mind) in throwing more work at it with such lower rep numbers.
Good idea and would be fun to superpose trend over literature data.
dinfar1337
New Member
it seems like i will pass the ball onto @Ghoul
he can do that and strengthen his position on no vaccum difference.
probably have to find stronger differantion methods than the one i freestyled
TallandSmall
Member
A&B being the only one with much dimmer is a real head scratcher for us bubbles boys. Feels like a crap shoot trying to get it right. Always nice to find out that it probably doesn’t matter in any kind of practical way. Do I take my Hgh out of the fridge to make room for more food?
Spaceman Spiff
Subscriber
I like how the dipshit is so silent about these test results. He hasn't said anything, just like his NMR testing.
He brought 2 arguments on in this forum but he has gone silent when things are underway.
He should be looked as someone that isn't a credible source of information and newbies should learn
He brought 2 arguments on in this forum but he has gone silent when things are underway.
He should be looked as someone that isn't a credible source of information and newbies should learn
AlexDavis43
Member
hahaha oh shit
"These data suggest best practice for maximum purity and minimum dimer of your GH, is to release the vacuum and store in the fridge"
Spaceman Spiff
Subscriber
Since you are so knowledgeable via chat gpt are you going to make any comments on these results? Or are you going to talk shit about @janoshik and retreat back to NMR structure evaluation which you failed to assist with?
Anything that requires more thinking than a search engine you seem to go silent.
I look forward to your response
