Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't make it past your first one, because I realized when I read it that you do not understand what you are reading.JAMA internal medicine? Who are they?
Here are some studies from people we all know-
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines - PMC
Repurposed medicines may have a role against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The antiparasitic ivermectin, with antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties, has now been tested in numerous clinical trials. We assessed the efficacy of ivermectin treatment in ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Vaccines experts are, yes. Much like my mechanic is more knowledgeable than most people about how to fix a car.Trust the government. They are smarter than you.
So, wait . . . Your problem with the study about use of ivermectin in severe covid cases is that the study subjects were the very folks who are most likely to have a severe case?
That's your issue?
Wow. I suspect you just don't like the outcome, because it doesn't fit your preconceived conclusion.
Were they supposed to study 16 year old asian females with low BMI to evaluate the effectiveness of ivermectin in severe cases of covid? How would that be a useful study?
Let's see, there is a study called:
Ivermectin Treatment Efficacy in Covid-19 High Risk Patients (I-TECH)
and somebody here (won't say who) is crying about them actually using high risk patients to find out if it is useful in treating high risk patients.
LOL!
I didn't make it past your first one, because I realized when I read it that you do not understand what you are reading.
Sorry, HDH, but there is not much use debating this with you. You don't even know what JAMA is, and the first review of available data does not support your claim.
I could waste hours going through the remainder of the links you provided, but I suspect you gave them the same superficial review without understanding what you are reading, so I just don't see the payoff for investing that kind of time when you obviously are not.
"The guy who invented the new vaccine . . ."
Now there is a load of bullshit wrapped up in a short phrase.
Thanks for the links, I'll take a lookThe spike proteins are toxins causing this to happen, you may get worse over time-
These are highlights of the three links posted at the bottom.
- Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., has gained access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research, previously unseen, demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines
- The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site. Pfizer’s data, however, show the mRNA and subsequent spike protein are widely distributed in the body within hours
- This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. It also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries
- Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding
These are the links-
- Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency also show the company failed to follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies and that key studies did not meet good laboratory practice standards
Researcher: ‘We Made a Big Mistake’ on COVID-19 Vaccine – Rights and Freedoms (wordpress.com)
“VACCINE” CREATES SPIKE PROTEIN INTOXICATION IN THE BODY – El colectivo de Uno / The Collective of One (wordpress.com)
Confidential pfizer research document – Rights and Freedoms (wordpress.com)
Where did you go bro?Hack and post opinion pieces are not scientific evidence.
Cite ONE from “millions of studies” that show Ivermectin (a worm drug) is better than placebo in mitigating the effects of COVID, a virus.
I'll tell you what healthcare workers say. They said fuk no I am not taking that NEW vaccine because I am not CRAZY - but they were forced to and went ahead with it trusting the establishment. I know enough people in the medical field to know they are the LAST ONES to take a new vaccine. They usually dont want to touch em for at least 3-4 years. I know PLENTY of medical folks that still have not taken the vax.But what do a majority of the healthcare workers say? Idk man. This always gets whack. citing websites vs studies. Conspiracy theories. Shit makes me sad but we are overpopulated anyway
No - people getting sick and some living and some dying would be NATURAL SELECTION. Hint the word is "Natural"... Now, What it MAY create is an entire multi-generational evolution of fukked up people and not a single living person remaining with normal DNA.. Maybe.. Maybe not. And IT COULD BE that the folks that don't have a bad reaction to the vaccine are folks who the vaccine dose does not work on due to application error, temp unk general conditions, or even conditions specific to a particular individual. But then again, that would mean that the vaccine was never required in those cases anyway right... At least not as for the sold purpose of Covid mitigation. I digress..This means that the vaccine will create natural selection according to Darwin. We will be much smaller.
Based upon CDC data 75% of HCP are fully vaccinated. Those that are not work in low risk clinics rather than hospitals bc the latter require vaccination w few exceptions.I'll tell you what healthcare workers say. They said fuk no I am not taking that NEW vaccine because I am not CRAZY - but they were forced to and went ahead with it trusting the establishment. I know enough people in the medical field to know they are the LAST ONES to take a new vaccine. They usually dont want to touch em for at least 3-4 years. I know PLENTY of medical folks that still have not taken the vax.
I will agree it was an interesting torque this situation created and was a first in terms of early vaccine acceptance in the medical field. This was because of the MSM fed 24/7 FIRE SHOW, and in combination of fear of loosing ones job. Shit it might even have had to do with some folks actually caring about helping people in the field they chose. And lets not forget the ones that WANTED to get vaccinated for the sake and lure of avoiding Covid Infection. Overall I would say more like HOPEFULNESS. So let's HOPE that the vax is not harming. I certainly do.Based upon CDC data 75% of HCP are fully vaccinated. Those that are not work in low risk clinics rather than hospitals bc the latter require vaccination w few exceptions.
And IME the majority of hospital based HCP taking care of COVID patients were anything but reluctant to be vaccinated prior to FDA approval.
I am a healthcare worker and friends in all states have taken the vaccine and are pro vaccine. Both in Red and blue states.I'll tell you what healthcare workers say. They said fuk no I am not taking that NEW vaccine because I am not CRAZY - but they were forced to and went ahead with it trusting the establishment. I know enough people in the medical field to know they are the LAST ONES to take a new vaccine. They usually dont want to touch em for at least 3-4 years. I know PLENTY of medical folks that still have not taken the vax.
Based upon CDC data 75% of HCP are fully vaccinated. Those that are not work in low risk clinics rather than hospitals bc the latter require vaccination w few exceptions.
And IME the majority of hospital based HCP taking care of COVID patients were anything but reluctant to be vaccinated prior to FDA approval.
Whether healthcare workers are cautious or not does not have to do with their political affiliation and hair color so much as their age and family experience. A lot of times in the past folks chose careers because their parents did that, and less as a means of making money for a job. This usually makes a difference. The biggest difference is the AGE of the peer group I suspect But again some younger folks (back when nuclear families existed) operate on parental professional advisement. So what I would speculate is that you are simply not aware of these PAST REASONs as they may pre-date you or your peers experientially. SO I would suggest that cautious professionals have either seen the past folly, or have second hand information. Apparently some shit went down before. But PEOPLE tend to have short memories as a general body. Hell it was not only a decade or less ago that the information about certain years of smallpox vaccine (I think it was) being based on some type of cancer got publicized. It was actually documented to some degree that anyone who received those vaccines got cancer genes which are also suspected to pass down to their offspring.I am a healthcare worker and friends in all states have taken the vaccine and are pro vaccine. Both in Red and blue states.
And no. I am not liberal etc/only hang out with liberals. I follow off of studies.
A lot if, I agree. There are more and more opinions that the covid vaccine was not needed, this is just business. The other side defends the vaccine.No - people getting sick and some living and some dying would be NATURAL SELECTION. Hint the word is "Natural"... Now, What it MAY create is an entire multi-generational evolution of fukked up people and not a single living person remaining with normal DNA.. Maybe.. Maybe not. And IT COULD BE that the folks that don't have a bad reaction to the vaccine are folks who the vaccine dose does not work on due to application error, temp unk general conditions, or even conditions specific to a particular individual. But then again, that would mean that the vaccine was never required in those cases anyway right... At least not as for the sold purpose of Covid mitigation. I digress..
