Will you get the covid vaccine ?

I’ve only known one person to have bad reaction and it was to the Johnson and Johnson one and it was serious, person was in hospital for days. Also of all the people who got vaccine that I know, most got covid afterwards at some point.

Are they really dangerous, I am leaning towards no. Do they really do anything, also leaning towards no. Do most people even care, again leaning towards no. Most I know who got the shots also don’t feel the need to get booster, but would if it was necessary to make the govt take a step back on restrictions.

Maybe I live in a bubble though and this is not the reality that many people have.
J&J is classic vax tech and the worst for blood/heart serious complications. I think they had to tune it down to get it back out in the UK...

Vax or Virus argument is what they want. Time to pass and everyone vax'd so there's no way to know.

Mask are good for keeping nasty bugger eat'n folks to stop sneezing chucks all over shit.

Do I Regret not getting vax'd at 50? No because I lived thru Covid with the full gamut of effects in late 2019, why the fuck would I get a vax after that? So there was no vaccine nor test back then I HAD NO CHOICE IN THE MATTER. Nothing about the vax impressed me after having Alpha Covid and still kinda suffering 6-9 months later...

What befuddles me is how 1 year olds and under can catch Covid and be fine real soon with the same treatment you would present had they caught a cold. There is something curious to be said and studied there. Kids that age don't even have an immune yet which tells me Covid is a genetic thing.. THATS CREEPY..
 
Most studies these days.....are rigged. In this study, it's a biased hit job designed to fail in every way. Did they dispense the ivermectin with fat, so the drug can be absorbed properly? No.
I USED TO notoriously love to review studies for bias and intentional flaw. I would suggest one of the biggest tools they would use to rig a Covid Drug study for non vax related reviews, would be to not administer the particular drug while the virus is still active and doing its damage. For example, in the IVM related trials on heavily lung affected folks, how many had active virus or simply ensuing damage.
(1)An even bigger tell on this rig-up is that they probably have never once presented documentation as to how much active virus was present thru the stages of lung failure.
(2) And if remaining active spikes then was the virus still proliferating, or just mounted to intended target but already immune checked.?!?
- BUT IVM therapy before the virus can proliferate, and viral load dependent, would make all the difference in the world...

Got 20 bux and I dont even have a dog in the hunt.. The list goes on if you just put you thinking hat on for 5 mins..

And I have said it before but by the time the vaccines were available, folks were pretty damn proficient at staying home, keeping their damn hands to themselves, and sterilizing everything they got near... So its hard to tell.

I think there is a lot of luck in the vaccine batch and well they pinned ya as well. And who knows, but if you want to go conspiracy, you could extrapolate that the folks that got a perfect pin depot lodged in the shoulder will actually last the longest before neg effects set in..

I just pray for everyone. And that THEY don't decide to make more effort to kill us again any time soon...
 

They aren't approved. Just lawyer trickery and gaslighting. And if they were approved, they shouldn't be.

You're a shill obviously. Don't talk to me again
No he's not necc a schill to speak of, more so a ROYAL JACKASS... :rolleyes: @Dr JIM

Yea I think he's right on the approval, but they waited a good while before final approval on those to make sure people were not going to just start dropping dead immediately... I'm sure considering the white paper that Pfizer is starting to release they probably held the FDA hostage at some point refusing to produce any more vaccine without at least one more head to chop if the shit went south.. ANd I believe the approvals were with the caveat that they could pull em at any time of their choosing.

And to think they probably had the virus and vaccine completed 5-10 years ago. NO they do NOT come up with vaccines in a year.. Hell lets just cure the cold if thats the case..

And believe you, not Pfizer OR the FDA wants that data on the streets.

I mean we are going to see soon. I know 75 year old slow cancer patients and if it don't take them out then either its innocuous and all the damage is really just COVID cause the vax just don't work, or it has a genetic guidance system built in to it. The later of which I fear the case cause if they took out one group, its only a matter of time before they go for more...

Consider they are going to great extremes to document DNA in folks. That's creepy...
 
I want to know a status on that nurse that got vax'd early on that passed out right when they gave her the shot. I hear one side saying she is dead as nails, and another side claiming she still works at that hospital. So which is it...???
 
I’ve only known one person to have bad reaction and it was to the Johnson and Johnson one and it was serious, person was in hospital for days. Also of all the people who got vaccine that I know, most got covid afterwards at some point.

Are they really dangerous, I am leaning towards no. Do they really do anything, also leaning towards no. Do most people even care, again leaning towards no. Most I know who got the shots also don’t feel the need to get booster, but would if it was necessary to make the govt take a step back on restrictions.

Maybe I live in a bubble though and this is not the reality that many people have.
In turn, I know and communicate with people, including my family, who had side effects from the vaccine and so far it has become harder to live after the vaccine. Shortness of breath, weakness, fatigue - this is what often happens.
 
If that is a serious question rather than a joke, then you should just quit, as you have no idea what you are doing when attempting to evaluate the credibility of studies.

JAMA has been the standard since 1883. <---- That's a clue for you.
You're kidding with that right?

Did you read the study?

The average person was 62 years old with comorbidities. It's the absolute worst case scenario study out there.

It was also done in a lockdown quarantine camp, nothing deepstate about that.

They didn't even use the correct protocol. They used ivermectin and standard care. That means there is nothing to stop the virus from copying itself.

This is all a clue for you.

So you just disregard all the medicines that work?

Sure you do, it destroys the whole narrative if just one of them work.
 
A million studies ????

Post ONE evidence based study that reveals Ivermectin, a drug that IS used to treat a select class of parasitic WORM infections is more effective than placebo for COVID-19, a VIRAL infection.

And incidentally the Pfizer vaccine received FULL FDA approval on Aug 23rd 2021, while the Moderna vaccine received FULL FDA approved on Jan 31 2022.
There are studies right here in this thread.

Yes, the vaccines have been approved but the US hasn't given out anything approved.

Run searches on military winning lawsuits against the mandatory vaccines because there are no approved vaccines being used in the US.

Perhaps you can explain why they wanted to hide the vaccine data for 55 years-

FDA Asks to Delay Vaccine Data Release Until 2076: Lawsuit (westernjournal.com)

Wait what? FDA wants 55 years to process FOIA request over vaccine data | Reuters

FDA Now Wants Until 2076 To Fully Release Pfizer "Vaccine" Data - Lawsuit Ensues - The Washington Standard

FDA Asks Federal Judge to Wait Until 2076 To Fully Release Covid Vaccine Data (teamtuckercarlson.com)
 
Last edited:
Personally, after the vaccines, I began to feel worse and relatives who did it also noticed a deterioration in well-being and quality of life.
The spike proteins are toxins causing this to happen, you may get worse over time-

These are highlights of the three links posted at the bottom.

  • Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., has gained access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research, previously unseen, demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines

  • The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site. Pfizer’s data, however, show the mRNA and subsequent spike protein are widely distributed in the body within hours

  • This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. It also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries

  • Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding

  • Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency also show the company failed to follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies and that key studies did not meet good laboratory practice standards
These are the links-

Researcher: ‘We Made a Big Mistake’ on COVID-19 Vaccine – Rights and Freedoms (wordpress.com)

“VACCINE” CREATES SPIKE PROTEIN INTOXICATION IN THE BODY – El colectivo de Uno / The Collective of One (wordpress.com)

Confidential pfizer research document – Rights and Freedoms (wordpress.com)
 
How can you be so fucking stupid?

If someone is old or has preexisting conditions they should be encouraged to be vaccinated. It's because of nitwits like you spouting absolute bullshit that so many nationalist trump lovers have died ass up in an icu.

I commend you.They were too fucking stupid to vote anyway.
Bro, how can you be so fucking stupid???

WE HAVE MEDICINES THAT WORK.

No need for this bullshit to be going on.

You start shit up, people respond and you take off like a coward until you think the coast is clear. Then you come back and start shit until you get run off again.

Lets try this again, for the 4th time.

WHY ARE THE HOSPITALS LETTING PEOPLE DIE WITH PROVEN MEDICINES THAT COULD HAVE ENDED THIS SHIT 2 YEARS AGO????

Now go run and hide instead of answering this. Your so concerned with ukrainians while our own citizens are being murdered right here.
@Big_paul

I see you have avoided this again.

For the 5th time-

WE HAVE MEDICINES THAT WORK.

WHY ARE THE HOSPITALS LETTING PEOPLE DIE WITH PROVEN MEDICINES THAT COULD HAVE ENDED THIS SHIT 2 YEARS AGO????

You are worried about other countries while our own people here are being murdered.

REGENERON- (they had drive up places administering this in florida)




IVERMECTIN-







BUDESONIDE-

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33844996/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8354567/

https://www.news-medical.net/.../Budesonidee28099s...


HYDROXYCHLORIQUINE-

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32205204/



 
The spike proteins are toxins causing this to happen, you may get worse over time-

These are highlights of the three links posted at the bottom.

  • Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., has gained access to Pfizer’s biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency. The research, previously unseen, demonstrates a huge problem with all COVID-19 vaccines

  • The assumption that vaccine developers have been working with is that the mRNA in the vaccines would primarily remain in and around the vaccination site. Pfizer’s data, however, show the mRNA and subsequent spike protein are widely distributed in the body within hours

  • This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. It also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries

  • Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding

  • Pfizer documents submitted to the European Medicines Agency also show the company failed to follow industry-standard quality management practices during preclinical toxicology studies and that key studies did not meet good laboratory practice standards
These are the links-

Researcher: ‘We Made a Big Mistake’ on COVID-19 Vaccine – Rights and Freedoms (wordpress.com)

“VACCINE” CREATES SPIKE PROTEIN INTOXICATION IN THE BODY – El colectivo de Uno / The Collective of One (wordpress.com)

Confidential pfizer research document – Rights and Freedoms (wordpress.com)
Hack and post opinion pieces are not scientific evidence.

Cite ONE from “millions of studies” that show Ivermectin (a worm drug) is better than placebo in mitigating the effects of COVID, a virus.
 
Are there any long term studies that show these first of their kind brand new vaccines are safe?
Because NO drug or vaccine is wo adverse effects, it’s important to define safe and your risk of COVID related disease, hospitalization and/or death.

To answer your question, bc mRNA vaccines have not be used in humans prior to this pandemic, safety (and efficacy) studies are limited to roughly TWO years.
 
Last edited:
Hack and post opinion pieces are not scientific evidence.

Cite ONE from “millions of studies” that show Ivermectin (a worm drug) is better than placebo in mitigating the effects of COVID, a virus.
What do the spike proteins have to do with ivermectin?

I don't recall millions of studies.

Do you know who your quoting and who your speaking with?

Lets start over...
 
You're kidding with that right?

Did you read the study?

The average person was 62 years old with comorbidities. It's the absolute worst case scenario study out there.
So, wait . . . Your problem with the study about use of ivermectin in severe covid cases is that the study subjects were the very folks who are most likely to have a severe case?

That's your issue?

Wow. I suspect you just don't like the outcome, because it doesn't fit your preconceived conclusion.

Were they supposed to study 16 year old asian females with low BMI to evaluate the effectiveness of ivermectin in severe cases of covid? How would that be a useful study?
 
Let's see, there is a study called:

Ivermectin Treatment Efficacy in Covid-19 High Risk Patients (I-TECH)​


and somebody here (won't say who) is crying about them actually using high risk patients to find out if it is useful in treating high risk patients.

LOL!
 
So, wait . . . Your problem with the study about use of ivermectin in severe covid cases is that the study subjects were the very folks who are most likely to have a severe case?

That's your issue?

Wow. I suspect you just don't like the outcome, because it doesn't fit your preconceived conclusion.

Were they supposed to study 16 year old asian females with low BMI to evaluate the effectiveness of ivermectin in severe cases of covid? How would that be a useful study?
That's why I will only buy the $800 a pill pfizermectin. Save that other stuff for the dog.
 
Back
Top