Poseidon said:
Well Pheezer....have you done first cycles with over a gram a week, probably not.
Well, considering that's it only possible to do ONE first cycle (I'm not Desi) My first cycle was not at 1gram+ a week, but I've done enough cycles over a gram a week to learn that More is not necessarily better. And considering the fact that on your first cycle (Which no matter what, will always be your best cycle) You'll grow just driving by the gym, it's completely unnecessary to use that high of an amount..side effects be damned, it's simply a waist of money, and will not give you any more benefit than 500mg Weekly would.
Poseidon said:
From first hand experience the more you use, the better your results given the caloric intake is also greater.
See, this kind of thinking is what's wrong with alot of the boards today...The Bazooka theory is not correct, and more often than not will cause a user signifigant problems down the road. - The more you use WILL NOT result in MORE gains (even if you are eating and training properly). If your way of thinking is correct then perhaps a first timer should use 2 grams a week, or maybe even three...then He'll gain a hundred lbs in one cycle and be ready for the mr. O after just one cycle....lol....There comes a point of diminishing returns, and on a first cycle that threshold is crossed rather quickly, I.E> will the pro's outweigh the cons by increasing dosage...?
Poseidon said:
That is old school...the whole receptor downregulation shit. While 1 gram will not yield twice as many gains as 500mg, the gains will be significantly more.
Well, no one but you mentioned receptor downregulation...and it's a first CYCLE..so why would starting off with 500mg weekly over 1000mg have anything to do with receptor downregulation??? This whole comment doesn't seem to fit into this discussion at all....And thanks for acknowleding the fact that 1 gram will not yield twice as many gains as 500mg....but I'm afraid the gains will not be significantly more....very minor gains to tell the truth....
Poseidon said:
Maybe you should give it a shot and then thank me. As far as sides.....how about none, most side effect shit, liver toxicity and what not is far exaggerated. I remember when everyone used to recommend dbol/deca cycles, tapering, etc.
Well, I've done many 1gram + cycles in my youth and learned that more is not always better....I certainly don't feel the need to thank you for anything. You did waste my time, by forcing me to reply to these ridiculous statements that you keep making, and I don't believe I'll be thanking you for that anytime in the near future...
Now to address the sides comments...."As far as sides.....how about none, most side effect shit, liver toxicity and what not is far exaggerated." ......Do you have any studies to back up this statement? Or did you recieve this knowledge while sitting in the dessert eating mushrooms? So what if you remember the classic Dbol Deca cycle...and tapering etc...What does that prove...Because tapering was foolish Idea..all information (before you came here to enlighten us) is incorrect?
Poseidon said:
My first cycle 1250mg sus wk, 50mg naps ED, Fina 100mg ED....gained 40 kept 32. No fat gains. No insomnia, nights sweats, or heart palps.
WOW...Chad Nichaels had better watch out. You gained 40 lbs off of your first cycle? If this is true...(which I have my doubts, but this is the internet afterall, so that means we've all got 12" dicks and fucked eachothers mothers) Then you were so far below your genetic potentiol when you started your first cycle that you had no business even starting a cycle in the first place...which would suggest that you had no idea how to diet and train in the first place, which would lead me to believe that you couldn't gain 40lbs in one cycle even if you were 100% ontop of your game...It reeks of lies..but hey..once again..this is the internet, and if you wanna claim those numbers..who am I to dispute you..
And to keep 32lbs off of a first cycle is astounding! Which leads me back to the whole you were so far under genetic potential you shouldn't have been cycling in the first place..which leads down a whole road of bullshit that I've alllready addressed.
Poseidon said:
A nice little link:
http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=199362
Personaly, I could give two shits less what your link says. I've been in this game long enough, and I've certainly done enough cycles to know what I'm talking about when it comes to side effects, and I've helped enough guys with their first cycles to learn that just by dumping more test in your body you will not get more gains....