sp5der - QUALITY US DOMESTIC

Excuse the stupid inquiry, but in terms of the raws purity. Is the remaining percentage (which is not the APi we’re after) thought to be simply inert / degraded TNE? Or are there things that we should be testing for that these powders are being cut with?
 
Excuse the stupid inquiry, but in terms of the raws purity. Is the remaining percentage (which is not the APi we’re after) thought to be simply inert / degraded TNE? Or are there things that we should be testing for that these powders are being cut with?
Curious also @Photon when you get time bro, shed some wisdom on us please.
 
Excuse the stupid inquiry, but in terms of the raws purity. Is the remaining percentage (which is not the APi we’re after) thought to be simply inert / degraded TNE? Or are there things that we should be testing for that these powders are being cut with?
I think it would require a GCMS to identify whether it’s degraded API or something else. And even then, it’s a “best guess”, but would provide additional insights for sure.
 
Excuse the stupid inquiry, but in terms of the raws purity. Is the remaining percentage (which is not the APi we’re after) thought to be simply inert / degraded TNE? Or are there things that we should be testing for that these powders are being cut with?
I think it would require a GCMS to identify whether it’s degraded API or something else. And even then, it’s a “best guess”, but would provide additional insights for sure.

We don't know.
Theres roughly 4 independent tests of it coming back at 87% but the final results seem to tell a different story.

Despite extensive testing on low purity raws in general, GCMS etc, it hasn't really shown anything. I don't believe GCMS is the way to go for raws. We have raws that look like melted curry come back good via GCMS lol.

There's a few odd lab results lately, OEPs adrol, NEOs dbol and now the TNE, all of which have one thing in common in that they crash easily. I'm wondering if it's simply a case of having to send in a new batch for testing.
 
Glad to hear it’s normal.

I used 6% ba and 60% bb which should be enough solvent to hold it at 120mg/ml but it did end up crashing.

I think there might be something wrong with that test tbh. Crashing at 6/60 with 87mg/ml is..odd to say..

I was looking in this thread and it seems a few others crashed too.

Does anyone want to help send their vial in to test?
(maybe even to AB..)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top