Sigma Audley Inc. - Your source for peptides, ancillaries, AAS, and more!

My only issue with the covid vaccine is that is a pretty poor vaccine overall in terms of how well it works. This is common with cold and flu type vaccines where the virus mutates frequently. I never had a major concern with terrible sides. Maybe I am a bit hardened with the vast amounts of compounds I have tried over the years with all the possible sides.
 
I didn't take the clot shots and never intended to.

I've never had the sweet and sour sicken, I worked around thousands of people during the entire time.
 
My only issue with the covid vaccine is that is a pretty poor vaccine overall in terms of how well it works. This is common with cold and flu type vaccines where the virus mutates frequently. I never had a major concern with terrible sides. Maybe I am a bit hardened with the vast amounts of compounds I have tried over the years with all the possible sides.
Fair criticism, but my understanding is that the vaccines still provide fairly robust protection against it being high-severity cases even when there's infection from a mutated variation.

Not THAT much better than if you've previously been infected, so I could see an argument about them having less utility if you've already gotten it, but hybrid immunity is the most robust of all.
 
A variety of vaccines can cause myocarditis, and the risk is much higher of getting it from covid itself. Hell, the regular ol' flu can cause myocarditis, too. The severity between them also varies significantly - vaccine induced myocarditis is usually quite mild in comparison to getting it from covid or the flu.
I’m not an antivaxxer, n=1 (me) but I had a much worse rxn with the vaccine itself versus my bouts with covid. Many others share similar sentiments.
 
I’m not an antivaxxer, n=1 (me) but I had a much worse rxn with the vaccine itself versus my bouts with covid. Many others share similar sentiments.
I certainly believe individuals can have varied responses and that some did not react well to the vaccine.

But they were also some of the most widely deployed vaccines in human history and statistically we know that people with significant adverse reactions were a tiny minority. But when ~70% of the world's population gets vaccinated, that tiny minority is a lot of people in absolute numbers.

a stra ze neca, reality will hit hard once you realize spike shots had no intent of helping you my goy.
sure thing buddy
 
Jst EO in the superdrol i believe, mine is the same!

They dont use EO either.
Believe what you will :rolleyes:

I'm curious about the TNE and TRE tho.


 
Last edited:
My only issue with the covid vaccine is that is a pretty poor vaccine overall in terms of how well it works. This is common with cold and flu type vaccines where the virus mutates frequently. I never had a major concern with terrible sides. Maybe I am a bit hardened with the vast amounts of compounds I have tried over the years with all the possible sides.
My thoughts exactly. It just felt like they rushed a vaccine ASAP and skipped most of the safety and trial protocols simply because they were shitting themselves. Everything about COVID just felt like panic reaction after panic reaction
 
My thoughts exactly. It just felt like they rushed a vaccine ASAP and skipped most of the safety and trial protocols simply because they were shitting themselves. Everything about COVID just felt like panic reaction after panic reaction
This isn't actually true, though, at least for Moderna and Pfizer. All the Phase 1/2 trials ran for normal lengths of time from the medication followup period side of things, Phase 3 got split into two, one for emergency use, one for full approval (this followed standard followup timelines), GCP oversight was in place, etc.

What really allowed them to rush to market was the timing of other things around the trials. Normally there is time in between the trial phases, but for the covid vaccines, as soon as the data was compiled, the next phase started. This cut quite a lot of time off the process.

The other thing that cut major time off the process was starting mass production during phase 3 trials. With world governments footing the bill, the companies didn't have to risk the financial loss of throwing it all out if things went wrong in the p3 trials. So as soon as the p3 trials were concluded and the data was in, the FDA could use it for emergency use authorization and there was a supply ready to go.

Trial length was compressed as well, but largely not in the way most people think - the follow up time period for phase 1 and phase 2 after vaccines were administered were the same as you would see in any vaccine trial, but the increased speed on all of the administrative tasks cut down trial length. Phase 3 was initially shorter - 2 month follow up time - for the emergency use authorization, but full approval was still received after the standard 6 month followup. Counterbalancing some of the rush for the EUA, they did enroll a fuckton more people in the trials than standard vaccine trials. Like 70k between the two for phase 3 vs. what normally would have been 10-15k between 'em. But they passed the follow up at 6 months, too.
 
This isn't actually true, though, at least for Moderna and Pfizer. All the Phase 1/2 trials ran for normal lengths of time from the medication followup period side of things, Phase 3 got split into two, one for emergency use, one for full approval (this followed standard followup timelines), GCP oversight was in place, etc.

What really allowed them to rush to market was the timing of other things around the trials. Normally there is time in between the trial phases, but for the covid vaccines, as soon as the data was compiled, the next phase started. This cut quite a lot of time off the process.

The other thing that cut major time off the process was starting mass production during phase 3 trials. With world governments footing the bill, the companies didn't have to risk the financial loss of throwing it all out if things went wrong in the p3 trials. So as soon as the p3 trials were concluded and the data was in, the FDA could use it for emergency use authorization and there was a supply ready to go.

Trial length was compressed as well, but largely not in the way most people think - the follow up time period for phase 1 and phase 2 after vaccines were administered were the same as you would see in any vaccine trial, but the increased speed on all of the administrative tasks cut down trial length. Phase 3 was initially shorter - 2 month follow up time - for the emergency use authorization, but full approval was still received after the standard 6 month followup. Counterbalancing some of the rush for the EUA, they did enroll a fuckton more people in the trials than standard vaccine trials. Like 70k between the two for phase 3 vs. what normally would have been 10-15k between 'em. But they passed the follow up at 6 months, to
This isn't a vaccine forum. I certainly don't want this garbage on the feed.

This isn't a vaccine forum
 
They dont use EO either.
Believe what you will :rolleyes:

I'm curious about the TNE and TRE tho.




Just to add on to this, I opened my only vial of OXO50 (inj adrol) and do not smell guaiacol. It may or may not have it, but It does not crash at room temperature nor in the freezer. I do not plan to test or use it (got raws coming). Interpret it as you will.

Depending on who, when, or which rep you ask, you will get different replies on what they use in oils. It's like playing gatcha!

 
No.

Tirzepatide will last in your fridge for years no problem, other peptides will have no issue lasting more than 6+ months easily a year in a fridge.
you can freeze tirz too and you can thaw it and freeze it again and it will not degrade. This is about Tirzepatide, other peptides are different and there are less data about it.

Most of all the peptides can normally be frozen in a standard freezer better if it's a chest freezer.

HGH leave it in the fridge only.
Lyophylized peptide will last a long time in a fridge anyway.
If someone had placed lyophilized HGH in the freezer, would it ruin it? Asking for a friend.
 
Just to add on to this, I opened my only vial of OXO50 (inj adrol) and do not smell guaiacol. It may or may not have it, but It does not crash at room temperature nor in the freezer. I do not plan to test or use it (got raws coming). Interpret it as you will.

Depending on who, when, or which rep you ask, you will get different replies on what they use in oils. It's like playing gatcha!

thanks for this! Truthfully i think all their oils have EO, but it seems some individuals in the past have said it smelled like guiacol, but if you got yours recently and it doesn't? Could the rep actually be correct lol? now i wonder if they just changed it over to a lot of EO? Because I have seen another company make it hold with (at least they claim) just EO.
 
Back
Top