MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

[Athleticfreak]

Why lmao what happened? did something big happen I missed??

Go read back 50 pages, quite a bit actually happened or search Photons posts about primal. You’ll find it.

 

[Tore22]

Go read back 50 pages, quite a bit actually happened or search Photons posts about primal. You’ll find it.

Great thank you will do I may reach out to them also thanks again have a blessed day!

 

[dcfreak]

Maybe you dont tolerate EO and you got the CN re-labeled primo that has it in it?

 

[Tore22]

I got it with the MCT carrier oil is that what you are referring too? I can post a pic if needed thank you for your help

 

[justanoob]

JK APES!

25% off today and tomorrow for Groundhog Day. Celebrate the new testing and new website look! Support has been amazing, thank you guys for everything. If you need anything else, just holler.

Please don’t sell out a product before I get home tonight!! lol

 

[CastleSF]

I placed with primal for the first time at the end of December ETA great, packaging great, gear looks good. However I ordered test cyp and primo 100. I did 4 injections. The worse PIP i ever had, injection site staying hard and a huge painful lump for weeks. Now I have one on my left thigh idk for sure it’s from their product but I have to have surgery on Monday to get it drained so it doesn’t go septic in my bloodstream and we’ll yeh once septic that about it. Anyone have any issues lately? Any advice on what the best most professional way to handle this? Thank you everyone for your input it really is a drag incant even pin my trt right now bc of all the lumps in my injection sites.

I pinned some legit peptides on my thighs back in Dec and had some unpleasant PIPs that lasted for a few days. These days I only inject oil on my glutes with a 27G 1ML syringe (the 3ML plunger is just too hard to press). I have pinned both Primal's test c, EQ, and NPP and WWB's Primo (Primo has been out of stock on Primal) multiple times with no pain and I attribute it to the small 27G needles.

 

[dcfreak]

I got it with the MCT carrier oil is that what you are referring too? I can post a pic if needed thank you for your help

I am not sure but if you search this thread for primo and china I bet you can get an idea if your primo is the resold stuff he briefly had.

I am just taking a guess, man. But yes it is MCT but china oils have EO and other veg oils in them as well. Some people cant do EO while some have no issues.

 

[Tore22]

I pinned some legit peptides back in Dec and had some unpleasant PIPs that lasted for a few days. These days I only inject oil on my glutes with a 27G 1ML syringe (the 3ML plunger is just too hard to press). I have pinned both Primal's test c, EQ, and NPP and WWB's Primo (Primo has been out of stock on Primal) multiple times with no pain and I attribute it to the small 27G needles.

Interesting it was primo 100 was in stock when I ordered on December around December 23rd

 

[datFr3akinRican]

I pinned some legit peptides back in Dec and had some unpleasant PIPs that lasted for a few days. These days I only inject oil on my glutes with a 27G 1ML syringe (the 3ML plunger is just too hard to press). I have pinned both Primal's test c, EQ, and NPP and WWB's Primo (Primo has been out of stock on Primal) multiple times with no pain and I attribute it to the small 27G needles.

Only pip I've ever had with primal gear is his Test P but to my knowledge it's common. I've used his test c, mast, tren with no issues.

 

[Tore22]

I am not sure but if you search this thread for primo and china I bet you can get an idea if your primo is the resold stuff he briefly had.

I am just taking a guess, man. But yes it is MCT but china oils have EO and other veg oils in them as well. Some people cant do EO while some have no issues.

What would you think is best to do reach out to them and see what they say?

 

[Tore22]

Only pip I've ever had with primal gear is his Test P but to my knowledge it's common. I've used his test c, mast, tren with no issues.

Thank you for your input blessing

 

[Whistles77]

Interesting it was primo 100 was in stock when I ordered on December around December 23rd

Dec 23rd was the MCT based domestic stuff that had GCMS a few pages back.

Vendor test: Janoshik Analytical
Raw: Janoshik Analytical
Customer GCMS: Janoshik Analytical

I haven’t pinned mine yet, but really don’t anticipate any issues.

 

[trynagains]

I’ll say this again. Never in the history of MESO has any burden of proof been on the member when posting concerns. The only time something like that would happen is if they were seeking a refund and the source wanted to verify the issue on their end as to not be scammed. That conversation would be private and only between the source and their customer, no mod and certainly not Millard have ever been involved in verification of claims in furtherance of protecting a source’s reputation. This board does not protect sources its purpose is harm reduction. Members here are not to be badgered and harassed about evidence to protect sources. That makes members less likely to post legitimate issues that would be useful information for the board. Every source claims this bullshit about competitor sabotage, you guys are just the first to believe it.

There’s a lot of knowledgeable guys here, but information about which needles you use and if primo lowers e, definitely don’t belong in a source thread. If you’re worried your source is going to be made to look bad by the red boxes maybe try reading the forum rules and posting things where they belong and the red boxes wouldn’t be necessary. Potential issues should ALWAYS be posted, it’s up to you to use your own judgement and discern what is of value and what should be ignored.

I understand that this board is used to promote harm reduction. It’s why I’m here. I have also contributed by writing several OPSEC articles as I’m an expert in the field. Also to learn from y’all as I’m pretty new to the forum. I have an honest question for you: What if a false claim against a source producing decent gear convinced members to go buy elsewhere from a shadier source? I agree members should be able to post what they want and especially their concerns. But what is wrong with other members asking clarifying questions so we can discern what is real or not about a source? Isn’t that the end goal? Is that also not harm reduction? Perhaps it doesn’t belong in the source thread? I’m honestly curious and want to learn.

 

[Tore22]

I understand that this board is used to promote harm reduction. It’s why I’m here. I have also contributed by writing several OPSEC articles as I’m an expert in the field. Also to learn from y’all as I’m pretty new to the forum. I have an honest question for you: What if a false claim against a source producing decent gear convinced members to go buy elsewhere from a shadier source? I agree members should be able to post what they want and especially their concerns. But what is wrong with other members asking clarifying questions so we can discern what is real or not about a source? Isn’t that the end goal? Is that also not harm reduction? Perhaps it doesn’t belong in the source thread? I’m honestly curious and want to learn.

I see your point and agree to an extent I’m not dogging on primal everything else was great it was the gear I got I can post picks of what I’m having removed but who wants to see those and the vials

 

[Magenzus]

Interesting it was primo 100 was in stock when I ordered on December around December 23rd

I bought Primo 100 on that date too and uploaded the Jano results. You can look back on the posts and see. As far as that Test from what the guys have been uploading the testing was inconsistent? Correct me if I’m wrong.

 

[Tore22]

I bought Primo 100 on that date too and uploaded the Jano results. You can look back on the posts and see. As far as that Test from what the guys have been uploading the testing was inconsistent? Correct me if I’m wrong.

Interesting thank you for that I will look into it now blessings

 

[Whistles77]

I see your point and agree to an extent I’m not dogging on primal everything else was great it was the gear I got I can post picks of what I’m having removed but who wants to see those and the vials

I’d say everybody does, along with all the details of dosing, injection sites, frequency, injection protocol.

Edit: I’d suggest most people don’t leave alcohol on their skin long enough to sterilize effectively, so I wouldn’t make assumptions that it’s the gear without ruling out human factors first.

 

[Photon]

Nothing ever gets addressed in this thread.
Each time bad results are posted, another unrelated argument magically unfolds itself and everything gets buried.

The more 3rd party results are done, the worse it gets.

Test E - China oil.

MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Primal Pharma - US Domestic'

Thursday at 12:42 PM

Jano Test E250 “Unknown Batch”

Waiting on other test, also requested Jano to fix report to say Primal and batch “P10” as the label says.

Did we ever find out why we never got the Test E raw results?

Test E250 Sept Batch GCMS

I apologize but was the Test E GCMS ever addressed?


Leaving this China Primo200 as a sample..

Janoshik Analytical

And a pure MCT sample

Janoshik Analytical

@SwolieGuacamole
@MisterT

• Photon

Primo 200 - P11 - China oil.

MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Primal Pharma - US Domestic'

Dec 14, 2025

Was the recent primo underdosed?

There seem to be a great number of people commenting here lately that haven't bothered to get caught up on the series of events that lead to the mistrust many have right now with Primal. Here's a brief breakdown of the events

Primal lied about this Primo's origins not once, but twice. First, it was made from raws they got in that they paid a lot for, and they were "too excited to get it (the raws) tested" and brewed it immediately. Then, days later, they "came clean" and said it was left over primo raws they found while looking through their...

• AllGoodThings

• 

Primo 100 - P12 - China oil.

MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Primal Pharma - US Domestic'

Today at 2:40 PM

Interesting it was primo 100 was in stock when I ordered on December around December 23rd

Dec 23rd was the MCT based domestic stuff that had GCMS a few pages back.

Vendor test: Janoshik Analytical
Raw: Janoshik Analytical
Customer GCMS: Janoshik Analytical

I haven’t pinned mine yet, but really don’t anticipate any issues.

• Whistles77

• 

MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Primal Pharma - US Domestic'

Jan 12, 2026

I'm going to stop visiting this thread, except to repost this daily.
Please direct any new joiners to this post.
Please re-post as necessary as well.

Beware, vendor (1) constantly lies, (2) sells contaminated, (3) under-dosed products which doesn't match vendor's own testing. If purchasing, please do BOTH HPLC and GCMS on products before usage.

(1) Test U 250 - > 3rd party tested as contaminated 200mg/ml. Used same batch numbers, for 2 different brews with different mg/ml...

• Photon

• 
• 
• 

 

[desertwarrior]

The framework of this board doesn’t allow for it. That’s all it really comes down to brother. Millard and the mods here aren’t involved in those activities. Who would be in charge of verifying claims? Who would appoint these people? How could we make sure these individuals were unbiased? There isn’t a system in place that would satisfy the masses and implementing one would be difficult and arduous to say the least.

As I stated previously, demanding proof of members has never been the norm here. It creates a pro source environment where members are less inclined to share concerns. Which is the sole purpose of the underground forum.

I understand that this board is used to promote harm reduction. It’s why I’m here. I have also contributed by writing several OPSEC articles as I’m an expert in the field. Also to learn from y’all as I’m pretty new to the forum. I have an honest question for you: What if a false claim against a source producing decent gear convinced members to go buy elsewhere from a shadier source? I agree members should be able to post what they want and especially their concerns. But what is wrong with other members asking clarifying questions so we can discern what is real or not about a source? Isn’t that the end goal? Is that also not harm reduction? Perhaps it doesn’t belong in the source thread? I’m honestly curious and want to learn.

 

[BigDadd7]

The framework of this board doesn’t allow for it. That’s all it really comes down to brother. Millard and the mods here aren’t involved in those activities. Who would be in charge of verifying claims? Who would appoint these people? How could we make sure these individuals were unbiased? There isn’t a system in place that would satisfy the masses and implementing one would be difficult and arduous to say the least.

As I stated previously, demanding proof of members has never been the norm here. It creates a pro source environment where members are less inclined to share concerns. Which is the sole purpose of the underground forum.

I mostly agree with you, but providing pics of rubber bits floating in oil and melted caps would be reasonable.