Photon
Member
What is you guys take on providing a new line using Miglyol 810/812? It would replace the current line I have. I currently use Organic MCT C8/C10. Just curious on preference.
812 is the gold standard.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is you guys take on providing a new line using Miglyol 810/812? It would replace the current line I have. I currently use Organic MCT C8/C10. Just curious on preference.
I’d be very interestedWhat is you guys take on providing a new line using Miglyol 810/812? It would replace the current line I have. I currently use Organic MCT C8/C10. Just curious on preference.
Honestly it’s because of the conversations you guys have had in the forums that now I’m looking for the Miglyol MCT oil and excited to try it out. I’d vote with my dollars for sure for better quality stuff.If you switch to Miglyol, imo, I’d list it in the product description. It’s worth bragging about, distinguishing your product in terms of safety and longer shelf life. More people care about the #1 by volume ingredient of what they’re injecting being, literally, true pharma grade than you might think
Ie Testosterone Cypionate 250 MIGLYOL
And many of those that don’t know the significance will look it up, probably conclude it’s a good thing, and might decide NOT using pharma grade oil is a deal breaker going forward.
Using cheaper oils to save 25¢ a vial may have made sense with $35 kits from China, but with the price increases for all gear this tiny expense is nothing.
High quality oil and some high quality stoppers make me wanna take my needle out and poke itWhat is you guys take on providing a new line using Miglyol 810/812? It would replace the current line I have. I currently use Organic MCT C8/C10. Just curious on preference.
I have some homebrewd TNE thats in Mig840 and @100 mg/ml that shit is like injecting water practically , no heat required,FWIW I’m not a brewer, but I know that while 810/812 is the long established “gold standard” FDA approved oil for injectable hormones in the pharma industry, the newer 840 formulation is water thin, and considered the smoothest oil based injection possible, while 810/812 is the classic MCT viscosity, so not quite as light as 840.
The only downside to 840 vs 812 as far as I know is that 810/812 can hold slightly higher concentrations, but have no idea what that is in real world numbers.
Yes, 840 is thinner. But I believe 810/812 is pharmaceutical equivalent. I have heard more people have negative reactions to 840. Would like to have feedback on more knowledgeable members on the topic.FWIW I’m not a brewer, but I know that while 810/812 is the long established “gold standard” FDA approved oil for injectable hormones in the pharma industry, the newer 840 formulation is water thin, and considered the smoothest oil based injection possible, while 810/812 is the classic MCT viscosity, so not quite as light as 840.
The only downside to 840 vs 812 as far as I know is that 810/812 can hold slightly higher concentrations, but have no idea what that is in real world numbers.
I have some homebrewd TNE thats in Mig840 and @100 mg/ml that shit is like injecting water practically , no heat required,
All of my vials have West Flurotec stoppers on them sir.High quality oil and some high quality stoppers make me wanna take my needle out and poke it
Yeah, 840 way is thinner by a long shot. Only bad I have heard is people getting bad reactions to it. But I do not have enough data to support this.I have some homebrewd TNE thats in Mig840 and @100 mg/ml that shit is like injecting water practically , no heat required,
It has something to do with the structure of mig840 in regards to possible irritationAll of my vials have West Flurotec stoppers on them sir.
Yeah, 840 way is thinner by a long shot. Only bad I have heard is people getting bad reactions to it. But I do not have enough data to support this.
It has something to do with the structure of mig840 in regards to possible irritation
I'd be happy to see that for sureWhat is you guys take on providing a new line using Miglyol 810/812? It would replace the current line I have. I currently use Organic MCT C8/C10. Just curious on preference.
Very interested, and following!What is you guys take on providing a new line using Miglyol 810/812? It would replace the current line I have. I currently use Organic MCT C8/C10. Just curious on preference.
All of my vials have West Flurotec stoppers on them sir.
Yeah, 840 way is thinner by a long shot. Only bad I have heard is people getting bad reactions to it. But I do not have enough data to support this.
Yes, you are right. Thanks for pointing that out. I was reading about it having better absorption840 has a higher polarity and absorbs faster than 812 , most people can tolerate it , theres always a few that just don't like the mct combos in any form idk , 812 is still good and well tolerated by most
I agree. I am probably going to go with the 810/812 route. Just because it isn’t just one person purchasing.I brew exclusively with 840.
It has better solvent properties than pure MCT which allows me to use lower bb%. It's also thinner which allows me to brew at higher concentration whilst sticking to thin needles. Shelf life, I believe, is also better.
However in terms of selling gear (which I don't), 812 is still a safer bet as you never know who's going to buy your oils and how'd they react to 840.
Thank you sir. I really appreciate that! Means a lot!Just my 2 cents, but 840 would fantastic! 810/812 is still great. Either way, I would be exclusively using yours as it’s very hard to find from trusted sources like yourself
