Is pharma HGH that much better?

[johnjay06]

its 200% counterfeit product the amount of hgh they sell in the indian market are more fakes rather go for the one coming around 7-8$ per vial if someone is genuinely selling it for cipla it can go around for upto $20 a vial

You’ve seen fakes of the cipla and headon? I definitely won’t risk it if there are fakes out there

 

[lilhawk]

If it sounds to go to be true...It usually is.

 

[opt_safer]

You’ve seen fakes of the cipla and headon? I definitely won’t risk it if there are fakes out there

lot more fakes than real ones its not dirt cheap even 10 distributors buying around 10000 packs wouldnt be able to get those prices . Pharma works under regaltory governmental bodies its a standard to make a deifinte price 1-2$ marginal prices difference can be done but selling a vial at $5 with export shipping cost is insane .

 

[johnjay06]

lot more fakes than real ones its not dirt cheap even 10 distributors buying around 10000 packs wouldnt be able to get those prices . Pharma works under regaltory governmental bodies its a standard to make a deifinte price 1-2$ marginal prices difference can be done but selling a vial at $5 with export shipping cost is insane .

Man I appreciate your input. You probably saved me some headache for sure. It's nice to have someone tied into the scene coming in to comment. That makes sense why all the reputable places quoted me around 10 bucks a vial and wouldn't budge.
You have any opinion on the headon hgh? Or is Cipla the better one?

 

[muscledudee]

try from egypt they are more reliable, they have somatropin 4iu

 

[Ghoul]

ive been working in indian pharma market atleast a decade never found it so cheap since a decade.

So how cheap have you seen it?

 

[SnowyMiami]

I can't find anywhere to buy these brands, and the ones I do are just as expensive as my genos and seros I get. I fail at the internet

I have a source in India I use for fertility meds and he is quoting $20 per 4IU box. I'll stick with serostim.

Not the 4iu single doses. Pharma removes any concern about sterility / contaminants, a pharma formulation is explicitly designed to prevent aggregation, and since it’s reconstituted with sterile water for injection (not BAC) and used immediately, the risk of degradation / aggregation from time/temp exposure is absolutely minimal.

I would for multi-dose vials though, not for safety, like with UGL, but because results from removing the “acceptable” level of aggregation pharma / FDA allows (which is established during the approval process) over the period multi dose vials are permitted to sit in reconstituted form is still better off being removed. It’s completely optional though, and just my preference knowing what I’ve learned about the practice of “bedside filtration” of pharma proteins being advocated by some experts and used in some hospitals.

Is there any harm in using BAC instead of the sterile water in the glass amps that come with the 4IU kits? I don't want to waste a filter needle if I don't have to.

 

[SlamSumTest]

no way this is a 6 page debate...

ofc pharma gh is that much better than ugl gh. people literally complain about cloudly gh and floaters in their vials lol...