insertnamehere
New Member
I dont see your point.
My point was:
If you say HC was not at all responsible for what happened in Benghazi, due to decisions out of her control - like budget cuts through congress and/or contractors chosen - then using this same logic you use to defend HC, Bush too wasn't responsible for everything that happened on his watch. Right?
I'm just trying to reveal your bias in your previous post - HC gets a pass but Bush is responsible for everything.
They're each responsible for incidents that happened under their appointment, respectively. That's a big part of having a leadership role - responsibility and accountability.
