Well as a former cyclist I can honestly say Testosterone would suck. I was a NORBA Sport and a Cat 5 on the road. As a former sprinter (track athlete), running back, and wrestler it's quite incontrovertible that I would have benefited from Test. If I was a NORBA downhiller, Test may have been useful. But what separates big dogs from posers in competitive cycling (road) is lung capacity, heart contractility, and O2 carrying capacity in the blood.scrappy said:GH, EPO and steroids are all used. Eq can help with RBCs but with it and any roid you need to watch the total dose/week. I know athletes, not bodybuilders, who use aas at 300-600mg/week total and do great at strength/endurance sports. I would guess 300-400mg/week would do most endurance athletes well. Mast, anavar and halo are all good for gaining strength but not weight and Test and EQ could be useful at lower doses. talk to cyclists who use.
The notion that low dose Test +/- EQ will benefit a trained cyclist is certainly conceivable. The notion that it would be comparable or even complementary to the benefits from EPO, hGH, or stimulants is just plain ignorance.
Thoroughbreds run on EQ . . . but they don't run very far. EQ at doses sufficient to significantly increase RBC production will probably suppress the HPG (gonadal for the sake of the women) axis. Therefore, you would have to take sufficient Test to match the loss of endogenous Test. Regardless, you WILL require PCT after a cycle. During PCT, you will lose the hematopoeitic benefit. So what was the point? Now the typical RBC does have a lifespan of 120 days so it is reasonable to believe gear might help but there's a myriad of reasons we used variations of EPO instead of AAS to boost hematocrit in the healthy and the sick.
EPO, hGH, (and to a limited extent stimulants) are not only highly efficacious but they can be used year round from training to competition.
Now an interesting element comes from research implying endurance training lowers test levels. If a person has low Test levels then supplemental test may be beneficial. Furthermore, this replacement therapy for the endurance athlete would not require PCT and could be given year round. But that's a far cry from talking about 400 or even 300mg of gear a week.
So let's be clear what's going on:
There's no doubt that AAS can augment muscle and strength development. But only an idiot would use AAS in lieu of EPO or hGH if they were looking for endurance. While the fool that would stack EPO and AAS and then hop on a bicycle for a stage ride will expeditiously be culled from the gene pool.
Last edited:
