MESO-Rx Sponsor AASraw: GMP-Certified Steroid and Peptide API Manufacturer

[The-Squat]

@Diesel77

Graduated cylinders are your best friend!

 

[Motojager]

My top 3 are based off 100% not 91%

I would just add 10% to 91% to get it to be close to 100% then add more to the desire needed, I like 3% added.

91 + 10% = 100.1
91 + 13% = 102.83

250 / 100 = 2.5

2.5 x 100.1 = 250.25
2.5 x 102.83 = 257.075

I was just showing the simple math. Target mg, divided by percent of compound, times what ever % extra you want to add.= amount needed
Basically the same as you did above in a simple form.

 

[The-Squat]

I was just showing the simple math. Target mg, divided by percent of compound, times what ever % extra you want to add.= amount needed
Basically the same as you did above in a simple form.

That's what I thought, wasn't calling you on it. I wasn't sure if I came across clear in the original post.

Been a long day in the lab and will be another tomorrow lol.

 

[Diesel77]

@Diesel77

I'm going to believe the measuring method you mentioned is the biggest part of your problem, syringes and beakers are not accurate, the bigger they are the more they are off and the cheaper they are the more they are off.

As @Sampei says both can be off but you will not be accurate this way either.

What do you suggest as the most accurate method ? I thought weighing a known volume of oil was a better solution than beakers . And I figured syringes were also accurate . Open to suggestions

 

[Diesel77]

Time to find a women, hate spending Valentine's with you fucks lol!

I'm trying to contribute here and spend time with my lady at the same time. I'm failing on both fronts lol

 

[The-Squat]

Graduated cylinders

What do you suggest as the most accurate method ? I thought weighing a known volume of oil was a better solution than beakers . And I figured syringes were also accurate . Open to suggestions

Graduated cylinders

 

[amicedrot]

What do you suggest as the most accurate method ? I thought weighing a known volume of oil was a better solution than beakers . And I figured syringes were also accurate . Open to suggestions

 

[The-Squat]

So my batch that tested 99% with AB that we can consider 98+, I'm going with 96% on the caution side. Still not use to seeing 99%, which is most likely 98+. It's not a big issue to me.

Even though the look is different a tad and a brighter tint than usual, it's very clean, it is pumping through the filters as usual.

This must be the cleaned up batch or post no melt batch or the no melt batch was something else, since nobody will test it we will never know.

 

[Motojager]

So my batch that tested 99% with AB that we can consider 98+, I'm going with 96% on the caution side. Still not use to seeing 99%, which is most likely 98+. It's not a big issue to me.

Even though the look is different a tad and a brighter tint than usual, it's very clean, it is pumping through the filters as usual.

This must be the cleaned up batch or post no melt batch or the no melt batch was something else, since nobody will test it we will never know.

What are you considering no melt batch?

 

[The-Squat]

What are you considering no melt batch?

I think it was the 1st batches made and shipped with the pre orders, I waited for pro order to end.

It's hard to tell about the test c no melt without any tests done on the raws.

Could have been the wrong items shipped as it was crunch time.