Loving my first go at tesamorelin

[Ghoul]

On meso??

In the underground forum.

 

[NOCTURNALDEATH]

In the underground forum.

Thank you

 

[xeonmasters]

just run hgh or peptides, either or, your just trying to raise your igf1 which can be done with either route , i prefer hgh because well , thats a no brainer, im over 50 and like all the benefits associated with, ymmv

my doubt is about the mechanism of visceral fat loss is through GHRH or some other, to know if it is worth using with hGH and it would be 1+1=3. I will test soon on a cutting season post igf1 use

 

[serkan]

For tesamorelin I'd recommend sticking to the protocols from clinical trials which means single dose at night before you head to bed of 1-2mg with at least an hour since you last ate.

If you want to try to make your tesamorelin stores last a bit longer you can use Dr. William Seeds' recommendation which is to pair 100mcg ipamorelin with 1mg tesamorelin for synergy.

I made great progress using Dr. Seeds' protocol, but my next run of tesamorelin will be a full 6-month cycle using 2mg every night.

Your mileage may vary.

May I ask where you order Tesamorelin?

 

[nixu]

Encourage her to stick with it long enough to see the results.

This is something you need to commit to for months for the intended benefits. . 6 months to reach a really noticeable outcome.

You ran for a year straight with daily injections, correct?

I've come across of protocol for doing 6 months daily injection of Tesamorelin and then taking couple of months off to have system reset. Is this shilled for cost savings like for example "5 days, 2 days off" protocols? What is your opinion on needing receptor reset for GHRH after 6 months?

 

[bubba618]

You ran for a year straight with daily injections, correct?

I've come across of protocol of doing 6 months daily injection of Tesamorelin and then taking couple of months off to have system reset. Is this shilled for cost savings like for example "5 days, 2 days off" protocols? What is your opinion on needing receptor reset for GHRH after 6 months?

The clinical trials did 7 days a week dosing for the entirety of the clinical trials.

 

[Ghoul]

You ran for a year straight with daily injections, correct?

I've come across of protocol for doing 6 months daily injection of Tesamorelin and then taking couple of months off to have system reset. Is this shilled for cost savings like for example "5 days, 2 days off" protocols? What is your opinion on needing receptor reset for GHRH after 6 months?

There is zero evidence of tolerance. Most of its effect hits by 6 months of the pharma protocol, 2mg/day. Improvements continue for another 6 months or so, and then it tapers off, and staying on maintains the improvement. If tolerance developed, people would “lose ground”, which the studies and long term observation shows doesn’t happen. Tesa is essentially a lifetime medication for the HIV patients who use daily it for lipodystrophy, with no drop off in effectiveness. So you’re probably right. An economizing tactic dressed up as having a clinical basis.

This is unlike rHGH, which you can develop some “resistance” to as GH receptors downregulate in response to continuous exposure at high doses.

In fact, switching off rHGH for a while, and using Tesa to “maintain” the improvements (which reverse once you stop rHGH), while allowing GH receptors to regain full sensitivity seems like a good strategy. It’s even theorized that Tesa’s stronger than natural “pulses” speed up restoration of natural production and make GH receptors regain sensitivity faster than if you just stop rHGH and go natty for a while.

On another note, I just read a medical journal article about the fact “abdominal obesity”, 25% percent of “normal BMI” people have is a major under recognized cardiovascular and all cause mortality risk factor. More men than women have it, and general weight loss isn’t really effective, even with a GLP, because in many cases you’d become underweight everywhere else before the abdomen (and it’s stubborn visceral fat, “dad gut” common as GH levels drop with age) gets to a healthy size.

They mentioned Tesamorelin as a possible way to treat this, since it’s so effective at blasting visceral fat and shrinking the gut, even without weight loss, by redistributing that fat elsewhere, like subQ where it’s essentially harmless. Restoring a “youthful” body composition type and away from middle age “spread”.

 

[nixu]

There is zero evidence of tolerance. Most of its effect hits by 6 months of the pharma protocol, 2mg/day. Improvements continue for another 6 months or so, and then it tapers off, and staying on maintains the improvement. If tolerance developed, people would “lose ground”, which the studies and long term observation shows doesn’t happen. Tesa is essentially a lifetime medication for the HIV patients who use daily it for lipodystrophy, with no drop off in effectiveness. So you’re probably right. An economizing tactic dressed up as having a clinical basis.

This is unlike rHGH, which you can develop some “resistance” to as GH receptors downregulate in response to continuous exposure at high doses.

In fact, switching off rHGH for a while, and using Tesa to “maintain” the improvements (which reverse once you stop rHGH), while allowing GH receptors to regain full sensitivity seems like a good strategy. It’s even theorized that Tesa’s stronger than natural “pulses” make GH receptors regain sensitivity faster than if you just stop rHGH and go natty for a while.

On another note, I just read a medical journal article about the fact “abdominal obesity”, 25% percent of “normal BMI” people have is a major under recognized cardiovascular and all cause mortality risk factor. More men than women have it, and general weight loss isn’t really effective, even with a GLP, because in many cases you’d become underweight everywhere else before the abdomen (and it’s stubborn visceral fat, “dad gut” common as GH levels drop with age) gets to a healthy size.

They mentioned Tesamorelin as a possible way to treat this, since it’s so effective at blasting visceral fat and shrinking the gut, even without weight loss, by redistributing that fat elsewhere, like subQ where it’s essentially harmless. Restoring a “youthful” body composition type and away from middle age “spread”.

Love you man. I appreciate the time you take to give thoughtful response.

By any chance, would you have a link close by for this exact article you mentioned?

 

[Ghoul]

Love you man. I appreciate the time you take to give thoughtful response.

By any chance, would you have a link close by for this exact article you mentioned?

The article links to the underlying study if you want to see the data in more detail ( Tesa is only mentioned in the article).

Even With Normal BMI, Abdominal Obesity Raises CV Risk

Two studies demonstrate that a large proportion of the population has visceral adiposity even at BMIs below the obesity threshold, and their cardiometabolic risk is elevated.

www.medscape.com

Medscape and their excellent daily email update is the serious “reader’s digest” of medical news covering specialist areas of interest you select.

You have to create a (free) account for full access (not sure if you have to claim to be a medical professional, but it’s not like they’d check).

https://www.medscape.com/register

You’d be surprised what you learn there via osmosis, and I think most will find a few headlines a week in the daily emails interesting enough that you’ll click and read.

It’d sometimes YEARS before the same info filters down into the regular news.

It’s geared towards medical professionals, but since they expect cross specialists and admin people to read it, it’s written close enough in “plain English” to be easy for a layman to grasp. Definately easier to digest than the studies it’s often summarizing.