BBA warning

HammerBarn

New Member
Concerns Mount Over BBA Operations Following SSA Admin's Sudden Transition
(This message has been tidied up with assistance from chatgpt.)

In a move that has raised eyebrows within the community, AkumaRift — a former administrator of the SSA Telegram group — abruptly locked down the SSA chat and began directing members toward a new group affiliated with a company called BBA. The sudden transition occurred without clear explanation, prompting widespread skepticism among SSA members, many of whom reacted negatively to the announcement. These reactions reportedly led AkumaRift to delete and repost the message multiple times in an attempt to manage the backlash.


Since the formation of the BBA Telegram group, members have reported numerous red flags suggesting inconsistencies and potential misconduct:


  • Inconsistent Information: Multiple conflicting price lists were circulated within the group, and initial claims stated that all products shipped exclusively from China. However, after a user claimed a U.S. package arrival within three days, the narrative shifted to include the existence of a U.S.-based warehouse.
  • Admin Activity and Silence from Reps: AkumaRift’s unusually hands-on involvement in the day-to-day operations of BBA stood in contrast to his previously passive role as SSA admin. He, along with two other early members, were observed answering nearly all user questions while designated company representatives remained largely inactive.
  • Bot Activity and Product Labeling Issues: Multiple users have raised concerns about suspiciously bot-like accounts claiming successful deliveries. In addition, inconsistencies have been observed in the labeling of peptides — with the same products arriving with different packaging for different individuals.
  • Moderation Practices: Allegations of censorship have surfaced, with users claiming that posts highlighting inconsistencies or raising critical questions are promptly deleted. Accusations have also been made that AkumaRift deflects scrutiny and gaslights users when challenged.
  • Lab Report Irregularities: Perhaps most notably, one user identified that six Certificates of Analysis (COAs) shared by BBA — purportedly verifying peptide quality — match exactly, in dosage and purity, to reports previously released by another company, OU Peptides. The reports appear identical aside from altered headers, leading to speculation that BBA may have repurposed OU’s lab results to falsely represent its own products. Both sets of COAs were obtained via the respective companies' Telegram channels and are available for independent comparison.

Despite attempts to discuss these findings within the BBA Telegram group, users report that such messages are swiftly removed.


While it remains unclear whether BBA is engaging in deliberate fraud or is simply operating with poor transparency, the mounting evidence has led many in the community to suspect either selective scamming — fulfilling some orders to maintain credibility — or a full-scale exit scam in progress.


Readers are encouraged to review the evidence themselves and exercise caution. Those with additional information or firsthand experiences are urged to come forward and share further details.
 

Attachments

  • BBA  Reta.webp
    BBA Reta.webp
    42.1 KB · Views: 450
  • BBA BPc.webp
    BBA BPc.webp
    42.9 KB · Views: 396
  • BBA TESA.webp
    BBA TESA.webp
    42.1 KB · Views: 269
  • BBA SEMAX.webp
    BBA SEMAX.webp
    41.7 KB · Views: 255
  • BBA TIRZE.webp
    BBA TIRZE.webp
    42.1 KB · Views: 244
  • BBA MOTS.webp
    BBA MOTS.webp
    41.9 KB · Views: 327
Additional Janoshik results to compare to
 

Attachments

  • OU TIRZE.webp
    OU TIRZE.webp
    45.4 KB · Views: 280
  • OU Tesa.webp
    OU Tesa.webp
    45.6 KB · Views: 284
  • OU BPC.webp
    OU BPC.webp
    46.3 KB · Views: 208
  • OU Reta.webp
    OU Reta.webp
    45.2 KB · Views: 199
  • OU MOTS.webp
    OU MOTS.webp
    45.2 KB · Views: 186
  • OU SEMAX.webp
    OU SEMAX.webp
    45.1 KB · Views: 270
The only way BBA would of gotten the COA’s headers changed is if OU asked for it themself. This happens when smaller resellers use a bigger supplier and janoshik sells this service.
 
I don't know if these guys are legit or not but a couple days ago I decided to not place a test order with them. The TB-500 was too expensive. I'd like to see them turn out to be another good alternative. Time will tell.
 
1. Alleged Inconsistent Information: Shipping & Warehousing

Claim: Conflicting price lists and misleading information about shipping origin — initially said all products came from China, later claimed a U.S. warehouse existed.

Response:
That’s false. A U.S.-based warehouse has existed from the start — it just wasn’t promoted heavily in the first few days due to limited inventory. There was no “change in narrative,” just a staggered rollout of info based on available stock. Anyone who asked directly was told the truth.

2. Admin Activity & My Involvement

Claim: AkumaRift was unusually active in BBA while being passive in SSA. Most answers came from early supporters, not official reps.

Response:
If you think I was passive in SSA, then you clearly weren’t active there yourself. I was promoted to admin for a reason and consistently engaged. I also received 50% off all my peptides as recognition for my role. Maybe you didn’t notice because I’m EU-based and you’re in the U.S., but my activity is documented. I’ve continued helping by promoting BBA as an option — including sharing links to Meso, GLPForum, and StairwayToGrey — all of which were removed due to the hate I received, not because I had anything to hide.

3. Bot Accusations & Labeling Concerns

Claim: Suspicious “bot-like” accounts posted about deliveries, and product packaging varied between users.

Response:
Let’s be real — the only person who made this bot accusation was “Harold.” No one else raised it. If everyone who had a successful order is a bot, then I guess SSA was full of bots too, because many of the same people ordered from both. As for packaging differences — that’s normal in this space, depending on fulfillment source and batch. It’s not some grand conspiracy.

4. Censorship & Gaslighting Allegations

Claim: Critical posts are deleted, and AkumaRift deflects or gaslights users when questioned.

Response:
False again. I’ve answered every question ever directed at me — and I stand by that. If someone has actual proof of censorship or questions being ignored, they’re welcome to share it. But throwing around buzzwords like “gaslighting” without receipts is just noise.

5. Lab Report Concerns

Claim: BBA’s COAs are identical to those from OU Peptides, except for swapped headers — implying possible repurposing.

Response:
And? Who cares if they are or aren’t from OU Peptides? In this space, it’s not unusual. Innotech represents Qing Li. SSA and Synthetek were both drop shippers. This isn’t a scandal — it’s how the grey market works. What matters is the product quality and consistency, not who edited the header on a lab report. If anything, matching results should be seen as a good sign, not a red flag.

6. More Claims of Censorship

Claim: Messages raising valid concerns are quickly deleted from the BBA Telegram group.

Response:
Another lie. Messages aren’t deleted unless they break the rules (spam, trolling, harassment). Constructive criticism and questions are allowed — and answered. Accusing us of censorship without any proof is lazy.

7. Accusations of Fraud or Exit Scamming

Claim: Based on the above points, BBA might be scamming selectively or preparing for an exit.

Response:
Let’s not pretend the grey market is some squeaky-clean operation. Most companies here operate through proxies or shell fronts. BBA is no different. There’s no fraud — orders are being fulfilled, and people are getting what they paid for. If you think this kind of operation is unique to BBA, then you’re either new or willfully ignoring how the whole scene works. I’ve always promoted caution, not blind trust — whether it's BBA, SSA, or any other vendor.

Final Thoughts

This entire narrative being pushed is built on half-truths, exaggerations, and personal bias. If you truly believe your claims, bring receipts — not speculation. Until then, this looks more like an attempt to stir drama than protect consumers.

And as for your “bot account” theory — cute. I’d love to see actual proof of that too.

I have attached Photos of who was banned and the reason behind it also, if you require more proof simply ask me.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2025-10-10 121916.webp
    Screenshot 2025-10-10 121916.webp
    23.9 KB · Views: 252
  • Screenshot 2025-10-10 121930.webp
    Screenshot 2025-10-10 121930.webp
    23.6 KB · Views: 234
  • Screenshot 2025-10-10 121948.webp
    Screenshot 2025-10-10 121948.webp
    24.6 KB · Views: 181
  • Screenshot 2025-10-10 122000.webp
    Screenshot 2025-10-10 122000.webp
    23.1 KB · Views: 382
It's always good to be skeptical, now Chinese holiday is over more peoples orders will land very soon and then you can decide :), also janoshick got the order for some products yesterday and it has been sent so this will also be a good thing :).
 
I spot checked the first BBA report# and code (mots-c) and it matches the image. No altered headers.

So … what’s the problem with these Jano reports exactly?

TTA
 
1. Alleged Inconsistent Information: Shipping & Warehousing

Claim: Conflicting price lists and misleading information about shipping origin — initially said all products came from China, later claimed a U.S. warehouse existed.

Response:
That’s false. A U.S.-based warehouse has existed from the start — it just wasn’t promoted heavily in the first few days due to limited inventory. There was no “change in narrative,” just a staggered rollout of info based on available stock. Anyone who asked directly was told the truth.

2. Admin Activity & My Involvement

Claim: AkumaRift was unusually active in BBA while being passive in SSA. Most answers came from early supporters, not official reps.

Response:
If you think I was passive in SSA, then you clearly weren’t active there yourself. I was promoted to admin for a reason and consistently engaged. I also received 50% off all my peptides as recognition for my role. Maybe you didn’t notice because I’m EU-based and you’re in the U.S., but my activity is documented. I’ve continued helping by promoting BBA as an option — including sharing links to Meso, GLPForum, and StairwayToGrey — all of which were removed due to the hate I received, not because I had anything to hide.

3. Bot Accusations & Labeling Concerns

Claim: Suspicious “bot-like” accounts posted about deliveries, and product packaging varied between users.

Response:
Let’s be real — the only person who made this bot accusation was “Harold.” No one else raised it. If everyone who had a successful order is a bot, then I guess SSA was full of bots too, because many of the same people ordered from both. As for packaging differences — that’s normal in this space, depending on fulfillment source and batch. It’s not some grand conspiracy.

4. Censorship & Gaslighting Allegations

Claim: Critical posts are deleted, and AkumaRift deflects or gaslights users when questioned.

Response:
False again. I’ve answered every question ever directed at me — and I stand by that. If someone has actual proof of censorship or questions being ignored, they’re welcome to share it. But throwing around buzzwords like “gaslighting” without receipts is just noise.

5. Lab Report Concerns

Claim: BBA’s COAs are identical to those from OU Peptides, except for swapped headers — implying possible repurposing.

Response:
And? Who cares if they are or aren’t from OU Peptides? In this space, it’s not unusual. Innotech represents Qing Li. SSA and Synthetek were both drop shippers. This isn’t a scandal — it’s how the grey market works. What matters is the product quality and consistency, not who edited the header on a lab report. If anything, matching results should be seen as a good sign, not a red flag.

6. More Claims of Censorship

Claim: Messages raising valid concerns are quickly deleted from the BBA Telegram group.

Response:
Another lie. Messages aren’t deleted unless they break the rules (spam, trolling, harassment). Constructive criticism and questions are allowed — and answered. Accusing us of censorship without any proof is lazy.

7. Accusations of Fraud or Exit Scamming

Claim: Based on the above points, BBA might be scamming selectively or preparing for an exit.

Response:
Let’s not pretend the grey market is some squeaky-clean operation. Most companies here operate through proxies or shell fronts. BBA is no different. There’s no fraud — orders are being fulfilled, and people are getting what they paid for. If you think this kind of operation is unique to BBA, then you’re either new or willfully ignoring how the whole scene works. I’ve always promoted caution, not blind trust — whether it's BBA, SSA, or any other vendor.

Final Thoughts

This entire narrative being pushed is built on half-truths, exaggerations, and personal bias. If you truly believe your claims, bring receipts — not speculation. Until then, this looks more like an attempt to stir drama than protect consumers.

And as for your “bot account” theory — cute. I’d love to see actual proof of that too.

I have attached Photos of who was banned and the reason behind it also, if you require more proof simply ask me.

"Claim", "Response", "Final thoughts" nice AI reply bro.
 
Good to see the accusations being addressed. He didn't have to come in here and defend it.

I know I was concerned when @AkumaRift started redirected people to BBA. Seemed like a legit shady way of using SSA's customers and redirecting them to an unknown source. I brought it up multiple times.

If BBA is legit and people are getting quality products, then it was for the greater good but everyone has a right to be skeptical, if not cynical, about the way it was done.
 
By the way, does SSA know you've locked the comments, and started recommending BBA? What did you get from BBA in return?

"Emoji away", lol try to read the room maybe.

10-10-2025-07-18.webp
 
Good to see the accusations being addressed. He didn't have to come in here and defend it.

I know I was concerned when @AkumaRift started redirected people to BBA. Seemed like a legit shady way of using SSA's customers and redirecting them to an unknown source. I brought it up multiple times.

If BBA is legit and people are getting quality products, then it was for the greater good but everyone has a right to be skeptical, if not cynical, about the way it was done.
I agree with you but honestly it was the only way I could keep my dm's quite, when ssa went dark I had over 1200 messages in 2 days, even had like 7 miscalls at 3am in the morning and it woke my wife up and she's heavily pregnant, people think I had "deceiving" people but if you was in SSA you would have seen I gave links for people to find their own vendors, hell my dox is public why the hell would I want to be scamming people, my wife even had death threats to our unborn child by a user called (black man) so.

I regret I didn't just vanish but by the time I decided maybe it would have been better people had already purchased from BBA including me so what sort of picture would that have painted?

so I have just stuck with it, yes I am drawing more people into BBA because I am still getting about 50 messages a day asking where should they order, and I don't direct them to BBA I tell them to do their own research, and I don't mind confirming if their ordering from real or fake HYB or WWB reps, as my dm's are full of people asking me to confirm if real or not.
 
By the way, does SSA know you've locked the comments, and started recommending BBA? What did you get from BBA in return?

"Emoji away", lol try to read the room maybe.

View attachment 353839
Obviously they don't because they vanished.
why is it locked? well did you see the mess in their when I unlocked it? racism, dead people in gifs, people being blown up and sniped, would you prefer I left it open?

nothing absolutely nothing (yet), will I get free peptides when I go to order again? maybe who knows , but right now I gain 0.

"lol read the room", what room? 60 people emoting most of whom are in BBA and ordering also if you check the emojis you will see I started them for a joke ;), you can hate all you want, just don't come bullshitting either come with facts or leave it be.
 
Back
Top