At some point, should this be considered spam to drown out discussion and reviews and complaints about problems with this source? Where is the line drawn? If not here, then where? 50% more? 100% more? If we agree that having 90% of the chat being filled with those comments is not something we want as a community, then what about 75%, and so on? I think it's excessive already.
More appropriately, "strength is in" consistently delivering high quality products. It appears that so far, there is neither much consistency nor much quality.
What does it cost to not attribute differently made products to the same batch? A difference in carrier oils unannounced is a big deal (allergies for example, as
@malomkarom pointed out).
Sure, you can change quality of the product and change carriers. However, INFORM US OF THIS, please! It does not tangibly cost you much.
Consider the impression you are creating by doing this. This is not something which is hard or prohibitive to do, so by not doing it, your customers may be thinking, what other common sense practices that we would expect to be done, are not being done. The set of those practices that they could be now doubting has massively increased because it now includes things that basically cost you nothing!
This likely has already eroded some consumer trust and does not help the impression of a high quality, consistent brand or distributor of brands.
Such actions can lead to large amounts of your existing customers switching. It is no longer the case that AAS are hard to obtain from a reliable source, so if you want to keep those customers give them a reason to stay, instead of more and more reasons to switch.