How did the myth start that Primobolan was an AI?

The TRT clinic I use does this in house. They do not use Quest or Labcorp. I would have to get it from them.

At this point however, I'm willing to listen to other arguments. To me, estradiol is in range. Perhaps this was the wrong way to look at it. I put my blood work out there in its entirety not to invite mockery, but to foster discussion, legitimate criticism and offers of assistance.
Thanks for sharing. Got a plot I will share. Let me find it.
 


What folks are trying to share. Your E2 and fE2 are quite low given your fT based on clinical trial data.

We would still need control expt for you to confirm effect of Primo on you.

Edit: notice some things never change around here. Pardon dickheads appearance in the link.
 
This hasn't been the topic for a single second since this conversation started. Not for a single second.

why the fuck am I here again? fml
That's what it says in the labs I posted. Surely, you can understand why I would be at least somewhat confused.

1757344301459.webp
 
Increase your calm. We are almost there.
insert angry-laugh-wow-hearteyes emoji

I don't think I've been this pissed in years other than the 200mcg Trumpers company incident. I'm genuinely here to try and improve shit and help people do this shit with less risks, then there's these guys... I have a hard time believing he doesn't realize all the symptoms, his bloodwork is shit enough to the point he shouldn't really get an erection without help, you'd think that's a tell for a man. Let's not talk about the rest of it, just the sex hormones is enough.

Some people are destined to die in their 30s-40s and live in joint pain, imflammation, ED and either paranoia or psychosis and there's nothing I can do about it. Time to accept I guess. The actually fun part was over like 15 pages ago.

I honestly admire your patience man, hats off.

That's what it says in the labs I posted. Surely, you can understand why I would be at least somewhat confused.

View attachment 346234
I'm starting to question whether you even speak english at this point.
 
It was about 2014 that Primo became commonly available. I've probably run 15 cycles of it since that time with 200mg of testosterone. Never found it affected estrogen levels significantly.

Schering never pursued a breast cancer indication - and aromatase inhibitors weren't really available until around 1990. There was a market demand. Even Masteron itself is not particularly strong at reducing estrogen and the breast cancer doses for women was actually rather high - 400mg or so.

It's odd to me, especially as this info is available on all the chatbot services to some degree. One would think this age of AI would reduce bioscience, but it doesn't appear that is the case.

One reads other forums, and complete loons are whining about how 100mg of primo "crashes" their estrogen. Very strange to me.
Just because it doesn’t work for YOU that doesn’t make it a myth. It absolutely is for many including me. The world doesn’t revolve around YOU.
 
my man is arguing about how awful statins are in one thread while sitting here with sky high triglycerides
I did not argue that, and I am taking statins. Which mostly lower LDL, the reason I am taking them.
 
That's what it says in the labs I posted. Surely, you can understand why I would be at least somewhat confused.

View attachment 346234

20-50 pg/ml per URMC. You're at the bottom of that. That wouldn't be great in general, but then we have to add on the fact that you're injecting a relatively large amount of exogenous test, have a crushed SHBG, and a huge amount of free test. Your E2 should not be that low!

We don't have a control here to compare against, but that level of E2 in those conditions without some form of AI would be an extreme outlier. Not saying it's impossible, but the conclusions we can reach here are that you are on a very extreme portion of the bell curve, or... primo works as an AI for you.
 
I'm starting to question whether you even speak english at this point.
Like, what is the point of saying that?

Am I blind? Cannot I not read?

Is that not the number 23? Does it not say the reference range is less than or equal to 29? Is the number 23 not less than or equal to the number 29?

Why not simply explain your point of view? What do you gain by writing post after post that is basically saying "Fuck you, retard".
 
have a crushed SHBG, and a huge amount of free test. Your E2 should not be that low!
As I said above, there are more sources than I can count on PubMed that detail how DHT lowers SHBG.

This is a reason people use DHT drugs - it raises free testosterone. Is there any way to increase free testosterone to the levels I have WITHOUT using a DHT drug?
 
Just because it doesn’t work for YOU that doesn’t make it a myth. It absolutely is for many including me. The world doesn’t revolve around YOU.
Wow.

The world doesn't revolve around ME. Gee thanks for taking the time out of your day to share that piece of wisdom.
 
I did not argue that, and I am taking statins. Which mostly lower LDL, the reason I am taking them.
I apologize if that was not your intent with the argument. That was one of my takeaways from it all based on your posts.

With that out of the way: Statins do make significant impact on trigs so a 200+ reading is still pretty nuts. I don't have a particularly good diet and my last trigs were 79, largely due to my ancillary use.

Effect of rosuvastatin 5-20mg on triglycerides and other lipid parameters in Japanese patients with hypertriglyceridemia - PubMed - 20mg of rosuvastatin resulted in a ~1/3rd reduction of triglycerides.
 
Like, what is the point of saying that?

Am I blind? Cannot I not read?

Is that not the number 23? Does it not say the reference range is less than or equal to 29? Is the number 23 not less than or equal to the number 29?

Why not simply explain your point of view? What do you gain by writing post after post that is basically saying "Fuck you, retard".
You still don't even try to comprehend what you're reading and arguing with.

Your only argument for why primo doesn't effect E2 is because your E2 is borderline crashed while taking primo. You completely dismiss the whole "effect" part, which happens to be the entire argument you're working against. DO you understand that? Like seriously, do you?

Your saying it isn't effected at all, cause it's in range.

Ever tried cruising at 230-350 test levels? Genuine question.

If you have, you have experience with the fact that the reference range is a warning for serious medical issues, and they don't mean "within this range there's no difference". A 10 point difference in E2 is literally can't get it up to fucking 5 times a day. The real medical reference range for more accurate testing methods is 20-50 in almost all countries. That is a ridiculously large range. Going from 50 to 20, which primo almost certainly did to you is enough of a hormonal jump to literally leave you a delusional, emotionless, numbs piece of meat with no rhyme or reason. I imagine it's getting pretty rough to wake up in the morning, thus the need for the antipsychotics.

Anyways, I'll just have fun talking to the rest of the community in this thread and try to learn and contribute, I'm starting to get over you stubbornly screwing with both your physical and mental health.

You are probably a grown up unless you registered as an infant, you have free will and you are the only one responsible for your health. If your will is ED, apathy and an early death in at most your mid-40s, go get it tiger.
 
Too much going on here. No, lowering SHBG doesnt free up more T. Not how it works.

Also remember lowering SHBG will also lower E2. Not just TT that is affected.

I will come back later. Unfocused discussion.
 
As I said above, there are more sources than I can count on PubMed that detail how DHT lowers SHBG.

This is a reason people use DHT drugs - it raises free testosterone. Is there any way to increase free testosterone to the levels I have WITHOUT using a DHT drug?
Dude, you are the worst about just saying random shit and pretending it is somehow some sort of argument in your favor.

Am I arguing with you about why your SHBG is low? Am I saying DHT doesn't lower SHBG? I know why your SHBG is low, and DHTs do lower SHBG.
 
Back
Top