Photon
Member
n-no
Did i read it wrong?
29.22 Benzyl Benzoate
23.99 (E)-9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
n-no
You are clarifying the EO comes off as "ethyl oleate" on GCMS not the ethyl ester hit? Am I understanding correctly?n-no
Area % in GCMS does not equal mass or volume % in the sample.Did i read it wrong?
29.22 Benzyl Benzoate
23.99 (E)-9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester
(E)-9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester
webbook.nist.gov
Area % in GCMS does not equal mass or volume % in the sample.
(E)-9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester
webbook.nist.gov
Ethyl Oleate
webbook.nist.gov
Two different compounds.
Cheers

For EO, even if it's the same stereoisomers?
So what is this then..(E)-9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester
View attachment 344878
Elaidic acid - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Area % in GCMS does not equal mass or volume % in the sample.
(E)-9-Octadecenoic acid ethyl ester
webbook.nist.gov
Ethyl Oleate
webbook.nist.gov
Two different compounds.
Cheers
Excellent correlation though as we have shown above. Same for BA and BB.Area % in GCMS does not equal mass or volume % in the sample.
Remember trans fats, like Crisco ? (partially hydrogenated vegetable oil)
The "E" version is the trans version of ethyl oleate so technically is called ethyl elaidate (so EE not EO lol)
Ethyl oleate would be written the same but start with a Z instead of an E
There are a few similar looking molecules in this report that probably contribute similar properties to the finished oil, so maybe "EO" was never really just "EO" all along, but rather a somewhat unrefined mixture of stuff that's kinda like EO
Was I close ? xD
There are a few similar looking molecules in this report that probably contribute similar properties to the finished oil, so maybe "EO" was never really just "EO" all along, but rather a somewhat unrefined mixture of stuff that's kinda like EO
Come to think of it, it was stupid to think any oils are 100% pure or identical batch-to-batch
Of course EO isn't 100% EO just like how every batch of GSO or MCT will differ slightly in fatty acid composition
Maybe the Miglyol oils come close since they're so highly refined, but probably still not 100%
I'm just curious what oil it is now.
It looks like a mix of some sort, not entirely MCT.
So i guess that it may have always been true that..the Chinese isn't using EO.
Except all of them except Q is using pure MCT.
Eh no..this has EO..
Looks like a mix of MCT & EO
Assuming (which I think correctly) EO is not one molecule but rather a blend of structurally similar molecules (probably the same with all oils)
However I'm just puzzled why it shows up as Ethyl oleate in WWB but not in PUCA or SSA. The other components do look the same.
If we go off this, then SSA and PUCA are using MCT + some other oil and wwb is using MCT + EO + some other oil.
We also have the assumption that almost all these oils come from stromusc, a single factory.
There are a few similar looking molecules in this report that probably contribute similar properties to the finished oil
Injecting trans fat doesn't sound..any bit good.
Yes, eyeballing the data I can tell you the correlation with those is striking as well. Thank you.BA/BB was a pretty cheap add-on test at $30. Might come up with a similar correlation with enough data.
View attachment 344892View attachment 344893
Dose/poison but yeah
it was supposed to be TP 200, but tested as 110mgWow
30% BB with 25% EO for Test P 100.
it was supposed to be TP 200, but tested as 110mg
