MESO "Specialized" Testing Group Fund

Here's how I think we should conduct the testing at least in regards to Tren

We should have a bad sample. One that darker than ideal. GSMS test it. Then we should also acquire samples that look closer to ideal. GSMS test that too

GCMS. You are referring to oil formulation here. I like this idea. Will give us qualitative view of impurities. Any degradation products of the tren will have similar ionization but different m/z profiles. If there are any significant amounts, we will see them.
These samples should contain the exact same oil, ideally. Preferably from the same brand. Same manufacturer. We have to rule out all the other variables.

Yes, just a color screen. One very light color. The other brown or whatever.

Finally, as the ultimate test,

Take a sample of tested tren ace raws. Assuming the purity is non-ideal, run it through one pass of recrystallization using dehydrated lab-grade acetone. You will cold crash this very, very, very, very slowly. I'm talking this will take a process of maybe two days. The slower the better ( we want dramatic differences so this matter) recover the crystals. Vaccume chamber them to extract any lingering solvents

Store it in a amber vial and send it to Jano. Perform a nitrogen flush inside that vial. That way during transit we have no possible way of oxygen or light degrading it in transit to Jano on an airplane.

This will show the differences we are talking about with data.

Before and after cleanup on raw. Nice. HPLC and GCMS on those two raw samples?
 
GCMS. You are referring to oil formulation here. I like this idea. Will give us qualitative view of impurities. Any degradation products of the tren will have similar ionization but different m/z profiles. If there are any significant amounts, we will see them.


Yes, just a color screen. One very light color. The other brown or whatever.



Before and after cleanup on raw. Nice. HPLC and GCMS on those two raw samples?
Absolutely, I mean that would give you data on the process even though we know it works on paper and it's performed routinely in the field. It's not rocket science, and it's definitely not black magic.

They do this during synthesis itself.

All we're doing, at least, ideally, is fixing up the bad stuff that's getting around.

At least that's how I see it, and yeah, I would like to see an HPLC test plus GCMS on both.
 
It's not rocket science, and it's definitely not black magic.
This is correct. Basic organic chemistry method (crystallization) used to clean up synthesis products.

Adding these references for folks. I had posted at SST but my job is never done, lol.


 
Your analysis and spectrum is spot on the first color. It would indeed be the ideal color. But as you can see, it's still light canary.


The issue with achieving the first one is you would have to have these raws and or oil produced in an oxygen-free environment.

As soon as Tren is exposed to oxygen, oxidation happens. How fast depends on another few factors including heat, moisture in the air, how much light, what type of light

The best way to store oil for tren would be in an amber vial.

This would be very, very, very, very similar to all trans-retinoic acid.

AKA Tretinoin which is also extremely sensitive to oxygen and light and darkens depending on the exposure.

But the second one is actually achievable.

I've achieved this one myself.

This is tren ace in mct oil.
View attachment 340121
i have never seen the first color myself, but ive seen very clear almost 0% opaque tren with very light yellow color to it.

i agree with you here i just put the standard from x to z and above we will not accept
 
This is correct. It is basic organic chemistry methods used to clean up synthesis products.

Adding these references for folks. I had posted at SST but my job is never done, lol.


Yep, every single one of my data points was derived from patents.

Then I came up with the idea, why won't we just do it ourselves? Take matters into our own hands. Be the change we wanna see yeah? Sure we take drugs but have standards no? I sure do. I wont be injecting anything not passed through my hands or someone who cares about what they make first.
 
Clearly we aren't the same person, lmao.
I've got fat ass thumbs. Trust me. I'm a better typer on my keyboard, but I'm often not at my computer. I'm on my phone. Doing work lol. I prefer phone for form posting so voice to text saves me from being frustrated that I can't type some keys out because my thumbs are like spades.
 
Yep, every single one of my data points was derived from patents.

Then I came up with the idea, why won't we just do it ourselves? Take matters into our own hands. Be the change we wanna see yeah? Sure we take drugs but have standards no? I sure do. I wont be injecting anything not passed through my hands or someone who cares about what they make first.

Edit: pic removed.

Was very telling once I had it in my hands. Realized no way am I sending that.
 
Last edited:
Here's how I think we should conduct the testing at least in regards to Tren

We should have a bad sample. One that darker than ideal. GSMS test it. Then we should also acquire samples that look closer to ideal. GSMS test that too

These samples should contain the exact same oil, ideally. Preferably from the same brand. Same manufacturer. We have to rule out all the other variables.

Finally, as the ultimate test,

Take a sample of tested tren ace raws. Assuming the purity is non-ideal, run it through one pass of recrystallization using dehydrated lab-grade acetone. You will cold crash this very, very, very, very slowly. I'm talking this will take a process of maybe two days. The slower the better ( we want dramatic differences so this matter) recover the crystals. Vaccume chamber them to extract any lingering solvents

Store it in a amber vial and send it to Jano. Perform a nitrogen flush inside that vial. That way during transit we have no possible way of oxygen or light degrading it in transit to Jano on an airplane.

This will show the differences we are talking about with data.

Actually, if we really want to be anal about it, we should use analytical grade acetone, which is prohibitively expensive, but if we're wanting the best data possible, perhaps that would be the path forward.
for the raws. i think you're onto a good idea but we should be within reason. lets compare bad raws 70-80% purity tren to 90-99% tren.

i also had the idea which dosent fit here since we wont be cooking at high heats for this experiment. but sources defiently wont so i thought it would be cool to compare different carrier oils and see if vials of tren with oils that use a higher heating point is more resistant to oxidizing through brewing.
 
for the raws. i think you're onto a good idea but we should be within reason. lets compare bad raws 70-80% purity tren to 90-99% tren.

i also had the idea which dosent fit here since we wont be cooking at high heats for this experiment. but sources defiently wont so i thought it would be cool to compare different carrier oils and see if vials of tren with oils that use a higher heating point is more resistant to oxidizing through brewing.
What I shared above was MCT. About as good as you are gonna do. Saturated.
 
for the raws. i think you're onto a good idea but we should be within reason. lets compare bad raws 70-80% purity tren to 90-99% tren.

i also had the idea which dosent fit here since we wont be cooking at high heats for this experiment. but sources defiently wont so i thought it would be cool to compare different oils and see if vials of tren with oils that use a higher heating point is more resistant to oxidizing through brewing.
Oh yeah, for sure, heat definitely has a factor. You can see it yourself. The difference between 40c and 60 c and beyond is is extremely dramatic, but you can slow it down by literally brewing in the dark. You can literally brew your tren with no lights in your room. I know that's really hard to do. And you will notice it won't darken as much as if you had the lights on with the heat. Light is our enemy too.
 
Yep, every single one of my data points was derived from patents.

Then I came up with the idea, why won't we just do it ourselves? Take matters into our own hands. Be the change we wanna see yeah? Sure we take drugs but have standards no? I sure do. I wont be injecting anything not passed through my hands or someone who cares about what they make first.
(1)

(2)
Now on to testing.
Get someone trustworthy to
(1) Buy 2 vials of Tren from a trustable dom supplier, same batch. (which tren?)
(2) Apply heat for a few hours hours to one vial (how high?)
(3) Send both for HPLC+GCMS -- the GCMS here is mainly qualitative, remember this.
That will allow us to see what happens.

I have a pretty amber darkish looking Tren E im staring at right now from GA. It is in a 100ml vial. Transferring it to a 10ml and its light amber.

(3) As for the raws testing, I'd say we get some feedback from Jano first. My understanding that acetone will not turn up on GCMS due to high volatility, same as b.a. A different test might be needed.
 
Oh yeah, for sure, heat definitely has a factor. You can see it yourself. The difference between 40c and 60 c and beyond is is extremely dramatic, but you can slow it down by literally brewing in the dark. You can literally brew your tren with no lights in your room. I know that's really hard to do. And you will notice it won't darken as much as if you had the lights on with the heat. Light is our enemy too.

100% don't expose your tren to the sun light or room window light for any significant time.
 
What I shared above was MCT. About as good as you are gonna do. Saturated.
and mct has one of the lowest heating points. no wonder it has this color.

i actually suspected mct would be one of the worse ones and included it as the worst in my list to test for

mct(160c heating point)

gso(216c ish heating point)

avocado oil(270c ish heating point)

all oils are strong against oxidization. though avocado oil is experimental
 
(1)

(2)
Now on to testing.
Get someone trustworthy to
(1) Buy 2 vials of Tren from a trustable dom supplier, same batch. (which tren?)
(2) Apply heat for a few hours hours to one vial (how high?)
(3) Send both for HPLC+GCMS -- the GCMS here is mainly qualitative, remember this.
That will allow us to see what happens.

I have a pretty amber darkish looking Tren E im staring at right now from GA. It is in a 100ml vial. Transferring it to a 10ml and its light amber.

(3) As for the raws testing, I'd say we get some feedback from Jano first. My understanding that acetone will not turn up on GCMS due to high volatility, same as b.a. A different test might be needed.
It won't show up because it evaporates so readily, especially under vacuum.

Acetone doesn't just stay somewhere, it has to go somewhere. It's boiling point is quite low. And if you pull it under vacuum, like I've done, it won't be there at all. Other solvents are quite different, but acetone specifically is extremely easy to remove. 99.97% pure acetone is pure enough for this purpose.
 
Back
Top