Here's how I think we should conduct the testing at least in regards to Tren
We should have a bad sample. One that darker than ideal. GSMS test it. Then we should also acquire samples that look closer to ideal. GSMS test that too
GCMS. You are referring to oil formulation here. I like this idea. Will give us qualitative view of impurities. Any degradation products of the tren will have similar ionization but different m/z profiles. If there are any significant amounts, we will see them.
These samples should contain the exact same oil, ideally. Preferably from the same brand. Same manufacturer. We have to rule out all the other variables.
Yes, just a color screen. One very light color. The other brown or whatever.
Finally, as the ultimate test,
Take a sample of tested tren ace raws. Assuming the purity is non-ideal, run it through one pass of recrystallization using dehydrated lab-grade acetone. You will cold crash this very, very, very, very slowly. I'm talking this will take a process of maybe two days. The slower the better ( we want dramatic differences so this matter) recover the crystals. Vaccume chamber them to extract any lingering solvents
Store it in a amber vial and send it to Jano. Perform a nitrogen flush inside that vial. That way during transit we have no possible way of oxygen or light degrading it in transit to Jano on an airplane.
This will show the differences we are talking about with data.
Before and after cleanup on raw. Nice. HPLC and GCMS on those two raw samples?
