What dose of EQ to test do you useEQ best AI control ever in my personal experience. PIPless, cheap, highly effective for me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What dose of EQ to test do you useEQ best AI control ever in my personal experience. PIPless, cheap, highly effective for me
Depends... 1:1 crash my E2 so I use HCG to bring it up.What dose of EQ to test do you use
Is this cycle doses or just trt doesDepends... 1:1 crash my E2 so I use HCG to bring it up.
Cycle doses, still have to try TRT with EQIs this cycle doses or just trt does
Would a mast/primo/test mix be worth considering?
Test for the base, primo for the AI, mast for the androgenicity. I’m thinking something like 100mg test, 100mg primo, 200mg mast. Check my e2, assess my feels, and titrate from there.
I am wondering if the reason why my e2 has such a wide variability is because of a high variability of oral bioavailability of the AIs. Perhaps due to my lifestyle or genetics. I can’t see any other reason for why my e2 fluctuates so much.
I’ve always been thrown by the anabolic:androgenic ratio. It does seem that primo should be more androgenic, but based on the anecdotes I’ve read, mast improves hypoandrogenic symptoms more than primo. Maybe people just take more mast than primo.
- Masteron: Anabolic/Androgenic: 62/25
- Primobolan: Anabolic/Androgenic: 88/44-57
Ratios source: ratio of the growth of a rats anus muscle to a rats prostatePrimo is more anabolic and androgenic than Mast. Mast left me feeling flat and dry. But my mood was great. Primo at 400mg made me feel and look fuller. I was able to put on some lean muscle mass with very minimal sides. I didn’t really see those benefits with Primo until I was pinning 400mg a week though. Less than that and I mostly just got ripped and more vascular.
- Masteron: Anabolic/Androgenic: 62/25
- Primobolan: Anabolic/Androgenic: 88/44-57
I read your thread when you were trying to figure this out.On 45mg TE EoD and 200iu HCG EoD I needed 25mg of exemestane a day to get my e2 just barely in range.
I’ve never seen anyone be as resistant to AIs as me.
Uh. Yea? lolRatios source: ratio of the growth of a rats anus muscle to a rats prostate
Uh. Yea? lol
Did you mean to write Anavar and Anadrol?go through the anabolic:androgenic ratios. it cant be right something like anavar is considered as strong as anavar? that list is bullocksBuy polypharm.solutions – Premium Expired .solutions Domain on GoDaddy | ExpiredDomains.com
Buy polypharm.solutions for 195 on GoDaddy via ExpiredDomains.com. This premium expired .solutions domain is ideal for establishing a strong online identity.www.polypharm.solutions
yeah. i might be wrong but i think they came from someone writing a book and put them in there. cant remember what its called.Did you mean to write Anavar and Anadrol?
That tool is interesting. I wonder if AI was used to calculate those ratios and what sources did it use. It seems everywhere you look on line the ratings are a little different.
I did two blood tests 7 weeks apart. Both were 90mg TE per week and 2.5mg anastrozole per week. One didn’t have 150iu of HCG per day, and one did.I wondered if you tried removing the hcg at any point and get a baseline idea of how much you aromatise normally vs on hcg?
Oh okay thanks, that’s interesting to know. Those results are a real head scratcher!I did two blood tests 7 weeks apart. Both were 90mg TE per week and 2.5mg anastrozole per week. One didn’t have 150iu of HCG per day, and one did.
The one that didn’t have 150iu of HCG per day had an e2 40% higher.
So while I’m sure HCG contributes to my e2, it doesn’t do so enough to make a noticeable difference in the presence of such a wide range of e2 variability.
Oops. I meant 90mg TE EoD. So 315mg per week.Both were 90mg TE per week
Are you doing the sensitive E2 test? The expensive one, like $150 or so.I did two blood tests 7 weeks apart. Both were 90mg TE per week and 2.5mg anastrozole per week. One didn’t have 150iu of HCG per day, and one did.
The one that didn’t have 150iu of HCG per day had an e2 40% higher.
So while I’m sure HCG contributes to my e2, it doesn’t do so enough to make a noticeable difference in the presence of such a wide range of e2 variability.
Nah. Does it make any difference? I was under the impression that the sensitive one was merely more accurate to within a smaller margin. Meaning its purpose is primarily for diagnosing low and not high estradiol.Are you doing the sensitive E2 test? The expensive one, like $150 or so.
Male range is low to begin with and it is common for the normal test to vary. Honestly I don't know exactly how much it varies but a quick google search gives threads where people say their sensitive test was tens of points lower than their regular test. The regular test also can't differ between some drugs and estradiol too.Nah. Does it make any difference? I was under the impression that the sensitive one was merely more accurate to within a smaller margin. Meaning its purpose is primarily for diagnosing low and not high estradiol.
