Neo Anabolics (US DOMESTIC)

For now, the 100mg/ml concentration is the lowest I have planned for the foreseeable future. I have not had anyone interested in the 50mg/ml.
It would be for females. 100mg/ml is too high a concentration for accurate dosing for women, it's too low for reasonable TRT practice. There is a reason female TRT is almost always 50mg/ml and male TRT is almost always 200mg/ml.

Not meant to be overly critical etc.
 
Do you plan on testing raws for future batches? We've seen A LOT of shitty raws results recently, even bunk shit; i.e. another vender ordered Mast E and got Test Ace, etc. I would see this as a must until the whole China situation gets figured out (who knows when that will be).
Absolutely sir, I will continue to test all of the raws before making any batch. This will be a staple procedure now and in the future, even when things get better.

From what I have understood some factories are producing particular products already. Staple products like your Test esters, etc. As for Mast E I have heard some things but cannot verify them. I sure do hope that guy got his money back. I think things are getting better, hopefully sooner than later.
 
Hello guys, I hope everyone is having a goo day thus far. Below I will share HPLC results for:

Test E 250mg/ml B2
Test Cyp 100mg/ml B1, which will be called TRT CYP 100.

I reached out to some that were waiting on these products, if I did not get to you please reach out to me. I will be adding the TRT CYP 100mg/ml to the pastebin. Sorry for the delay with the testing on the products. I hope they do not disappoint.

View attachment 326393View attachment 326394
@NeoAnabolics Please tell me what % BB is in your oils?
 
Thank you for sending this out to test and posting results! Please reach out for credit of your preference. I require for the sealed vial to be sent out. But I just realized it is not under HPLC section in the pastebin. I am sure it is in one of my post. Just for future reference.
Sure, no problem, appreciate it!
 
I am disappointed the HPLC for my sample was 297.85 mg/ml, so there is ~3.5% variance. If I am not mistaking, Jano said there is a potential for a 5% variance. This happened with the Test Cyp 250 mg/ml concentration a few months ago. We can tag him if any doubts.
 
I am disappointed the HPLC for my sample was 297.85 mg/ml, so there is ~3.5% variance. If I am not mistaking, Jano said there is a potential for a 5% variance. This happened with the Test Cyp 250 mg/ml concentration a few months ago. We can tag him if any doubts.

Not sure what he considers normal variance for oils as i don’t recall seeing a discussion about it but i have seen much greater variance than 5% in some peptides a while back, it was a crazy high number from test to test
 
I am disappointed the HPLC for my sample was 297.85 mg/ml, so there is ~3.5% variance. If I am not mistaking, Jano said there is a potential for a 5% variance. This happened with the Test Cyp 250 mg/ml concentration a few months ago. We can tag him if any doubts.
Looks like the Q primo I had tested came back about 5% lower than it did when tested before
 
I am disappointed the HPLC for my sample was 297.85 mg/ml, so there is ~3.5% variance. If I am not mistaking, Jano said there is a potential for a 5% variance. This happened with the Test Cyp 250 mg/ml concentration a few months ago. We can tag him if any doubts.
I was going to run the numbers on it after I got off work for the variance between tests.

So I take it that this is the same batch of finished product correct and not a brew using the same raws with the same recipe?
 
FDA allows a 10% variance in active and inactive ingredients in branded drugs; the same variance is acceptable in generic versions.

According to Google.

Two or so years ago I sent a sample of my Prescription Test in and a sample from KOAG and the prescription 200mg/ml stuff was 8-9% under dosed and his was almost spot on like 253 for 250 or something best I recall.

I was sold on after that LoL.

I'll dig around and I still have the vials I tested in a box somewhere. I want to say the pharmacy stuff was from the Philippines or something like that.
 
FDA allows a 10% variance in active and inactive ingredients in branded drugs; the same variance is acceptable in generic versions.

According to Google.

Two or so years ago I sent a sample of my Prescription Test in and a sample from KOAG and the prescription 200mg/ml stuff was 8-9% under dosed and his was almost spot on like 253 for 250 or something best I recall.

I was sold on after that LoL.

I'll dig around and I still have the vials I tested in a box somewhere. I want to say the pharmacy stuff was from the Philippines or something like that.
I always wondered about that with the pharma test. I may have to send some of mine next time I send a box to jano.
 
Back
Top