I also agree with everything you said in your post about BP, and it bothers me when people act like a systolic BP of 130 all the time is somehow acceptable. Ideally, we can get that down to 110 as long as we don’t crush our diastolic BP number, which is optimal at 70-80 for reducing all cause mortality risk.Of course everyone's entitled to their opinion, drawn from their experience etc.
However, every set of hypertension treatment guidelines from medical organizations. which are updated based on evidence every few years, have increasingly discouraged use of beta blockers and reserve them as a last resort for treatment resistant hypertension, because of the negative consequences associated with their use(more strokes, being the primary reason).
TLDR the steps are currently in the order of:
ACE/ARB + Calcium channel blocker minimum doses.
Increase doses of one or both to maximum tolerable if bp not at target.
If still not at target, add diuretic.
Finally, if still not working add a Beta Blocker.
View attachment 313597View attachment 313601
I look at lowering systolic BP the same way I look at lowering ApoB/LDL. Why settle for an LDL of 100 when you can get it down to 50?
The only thing I’ll nitpick is that I think Nebivolol (but no other beta blocker) is a better choice than Amlodipine only if someone also wants to reduce their resting heart rate, which is usually higher on AAS. I realize it’s against the guidelines, but I think there are exceptions for bodybuilders in many cases. Can’t go wrong either way though.

