What do you mean, "do not always apply"?
You will have to be specific on this one but I'll go ahead and answer for you.
All the meds apply.
Regeneron is the same as hydroxychloroquine, it works so they need to cover it up. Remember what the lancet put out? It will kill you even though we have been prescribing it for 50 or so years?
Can you explain the lancet report?
Regeneron in Florida was given out doses as drive up/threw just like they were doing with the vaccines. It was working so the biden administration said it wasn't and stopped it from being distributed.
Florida has some of the lowest numbers for a reason. No lockdowns, mask mandates or vaccine pushing. The highest numbers are reported from the heaviest lockdown / mask wearing places.
BTW, Regeneron was what Trump used to knock out covid in a few days. Just like he suggested HCQ, that works by the way.
On this you are 100% absolutely wrong about them not working. There are many studies here and from around the world that show they do.
This is where your misinformation can be dangerous to people. Here are more than 400 studies on Ivermectin and HCQ-
Here is the conclusion from 82 Ivermectin studies-
Conclusion
Ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19. Treatment is more effective when used early. Meta analysis using the most serious outcome shows 63% [53‑72%] and 83% [74‑89%] improvement for
early treatment and prophylaxis, with similar results after
exclusion based sensitivity analysis, for
primary outcomes, for
peer-reviewed studies, and for
RCTs. Statistically significant improvements are seen for
mortality,
ventilation,
ICU admission,
hospitalization,
recovery,
cases, and
viral clearance. All remain significant after
exclusions. 53 studies from 48 independent teams in 22 different countries show statistically significant improvements in isolation (39 for primary outcomes, and 36 for the most serious outcome). Results are very robust — in worst case exclusion sensitivity analysis 54 of 82 studies must be excluded to avoid finding statistically significant efficacy.
Here is the conclusion from 339 HCQ studies-
Conclusion
HCQ is an effective treatment for COVID-19. Treatment is more effective when used early. Meta analysis using the most serious outcome reported shows 63% [53‑70%] improvement for the 38
early treatment studies. Results are similar after exclusion based sensitivity analysis and after restriction to peer-reviewed studies. Restricting to the 11
RCTs shows 39% [8‑59%] improvement, and restricting to the 15
mortality results shows 72% [57‑81%] lower mortality. Very late stage treatment is not effective and may be harmful, especially when using excessive dosages.
The HCQ studies are tainted from all the fake USA reporting at the beginning when they tried to take medical licenses away from anyone that would speak of it.
•There is evidence of
bias towards publishing negative results. 76% of prospective studies report positive effects, compared to 71% of retrospective studies.
Studies from North America are 2.7 times more likely to report negative results than studies from the rest of the world combined,
p = 0.0000000055.
Countries reporting positive results, the US and Canada sit at the bottom of this list for a reason-
Asia- 85.7%
Europe- 82%
Africa- 78.6%
Middle East- 71%
South America- 68.8%
North America- 46.2%
That's like saying Before you inject test spit in the sink. It will make you grow. And you will continue doing so because you found a connection. Ignore the fact that the steroids would have made you grow regardless.
That's an example that some people can survive.
No, it's not like saying that, you just have to know the facts.
The current monoclonals btw are bad ass but you can only give it to so many people. Even then some of the ones on trial lost effectiveness to ba2. Nobody made money off of the old treatment cause it was a trial.
Sotrvcimab was effective against ba1. To
Evusheld is effective as prophylactic for ba1 and ba2.
We were using this for patients where the vaccine doesn't develop antibodies.
Here is a link to the new monoclonal sites in Florida now, it also lists who can get it and who can't-
You always have a kook out of all the doctors. There are some who say stupid shit and want attention. I have a doctor who likes to make money off of people and another one who doesn't charge or require enough visits because he is too nice.
Super easy to write people off as crazy if they don't share the same point of view. It's a big leftist tactic even though you claim conservative. You know absolutely nothing about either one of those women.
I love the people who I take care of. If they did work, trust me atleast the people who I work with would do so.
But everyone is entitled to what they believe. Everyone wants to be their own doctor nowadays regardless of their providers knowledge. This is why I hate universal healthcare. People should either take the doctors advice and listen or be on their own.
Somehow healthcare became a right and they can sue us if things don't work out properly
So if all 98%+ of the doctors say doctors like this are quacks. why would you believe the other 2%?
That's funny, it's like saying 97% of all scientists agree on global warming. Do you have facts to back this up or educated guess?
The honest answer is if you are one of the 98%, I'll go with the quacks because you are totally misinformed on what really works.
I dont mean to sound like a douchebag but she is an ER doctors who works for Indian health services and probably underfunded. its not like she is actively doing research or first line treatment with the up to date medication that is available such as the monoclonals that are available now. She doesnt work at a research hospital. If she is not allowed to prescribe the medication why would she know the effectiveness even from an anectodal standpoint
Bro did you even watch the video?
Here you are berating and trying to cancel these ladies because they put holes in your beliefs and you have nothing real in defense of this.
The hospital is not reporting adverse affects from the vaccine. Period.
What does research for treatment and monoclonals have to do with adverse affects not being reported?
Nothing.
What about the nurse that was pushed into the vaccine? She refused it then finally caved to be part of the team there at that hospital then died a few days later???
You conveniently skipped over that.
Here is a lady that is first line, tell me how crazy she is on this one, she is an expert.
BTW, this is a short clip of about 4 hours of doctors and nurses all saying the same shit-
View: https://youtu.be/5SVO0lc_1_o
Thats like getting lifting advice from the smallest guy in the gym.
Not really dude.
I dont keep up with political groups or people who post videos but it appears that this is a strong right wing organization that pushed out this video which reinforces that politicans blue or red shouldnt be using this as a way to gain voters, have people choose sides, etc. They should be listening to their doctors.
It's unfortunate you don't keep up with politics because this is pure politics fella.
I remember hearing old healthcare providers tell patients if they dont like the way things are. go to the hospital down the street. we are all about patient satisfaction where people do not listen to their providers anymore.
===============
Man I hope you will continue on with this conversation. I have more info than I can probably find.
Between social media and the bodybuilding community, I've had this discussion with 3 doctors, 2 nurses and a handful of "in the medical field" and they all stop replying when the info comes out.
You would think one of them would have answers but they simply don't.
I'll bet you are writing me off as far right looney right about now
I'll ask once again...
Why are hospitals letting patients die without giving them the medicine that works?
In the past we always called it murder, what has changed?