I hope the main thing that comes out of this is a restriction on govt ability to place restrictions. This is foolish, these people do not know better than me what is good for me and my family nor so they share my risk tolerance. This virus varies in degree too widely to allow for these blanket bans. So should we take it as a win that at least we are alive but homeless? How do these governors know that we would die from the virus or have it really bad? They don’t. And while I agree with some restrictions to allow for hospitals to be able to run, shut downs should be against the law. The governors should have no right to tell a legal business operating within the law that they are no longer allowed to run. The fact that they can is a problem that needs to be dealt with and not with violence and protests but by the law. Wear your stupid masks, social distance in public, limit max capacity while still allowing for places to operate at a profit. But beyond that, government should stay out and allow for individuals to exercise their freedom based on their risk acceptance. Especially in this case. Now if a virus killed 90% of people and it was really dangerous to go outside sure. But don’t tell me i am in grave danger if I share air with someone not in my house. Yes, I may be in that small percentage that catches it and dies or has a very hard time, that really does happen, but percentage wise it is kind of small. So to tell the general population they are in grave danger is kind of a lie. More danger than two years ago?, of course, absolutely agree. Grave danger?, that is pushing it.