I tend to disagree, if you speak about his content being searchable in absolutes.
No matter if you convinced that he has read many hundreds of studies for a deep dive he worked on for two weeks (as he had claimed in the past), those deep dives are extremely comprehensive, when compared to any other content creator on YT, and one can (or could) take away a lot from them.
Sadly, I am almost certain that he keenly aware of this, they of very little value, for anyone trying to read up in depth about a certain drug. His rhythm of speech and intonation became very youtubey, which makes it very hard for me to listen to his deep-dive.
There is a reason a Uni professor doesn't speak in such a way.
He could publish the scripts for those videos, and post them as articles on his website, and as far as I understand he did so in the past, but we know that this would hurt his income for various reasons, and why he therefore stopped doing so (if he actually did?!).
The automatic transcripts of YT videos are pretty shit - to say the least.
Which is not to say, that there are many morons in his streams, but his condescending way of constantly insulting his audience, and his increasing arrogance since he went from having 2k subscribers (or so), when I had discovered his videos, is becoming extremely annoying.
Compare that to Scott Stevenson for example.