Is everybody who is skeptical about the C19 shots an “anti-vaxxer” in your mind? Just curious, how many covid jabs did you get?
Skeptical of what, precisely? Individual benefit? Collective benefit? Side effects? What are you skeptical of? In answer to your question, is that I would likely presume that anyone "skeptical" of a vaccine might be an anti-vaxxer.
Ultimately, the vaccines for Covid and all others have to be considered from a public health perspective. If there is any risk at all associated with being vaccinated and herd immunity is sufficiently high, then the only rational choice is to not get vaccinated. It's a typical prisoner's dilemma.
As such, any outrage over the fact that some few individuals may experience issues have to be balanced with the consideration of what public health benefit may arise from having the vaccine. In the case of C19, the vaccine slowed the pace of the pandemic sufficient to allow the health care system to address the needs of those most at risk.
Just saying, but someone skeptical of C19 vaccines may still support other vaccines, such as those for measles or polio, but have concerns about the COVID shots due to factors like their rapid development, novel mRNA technology, or potential side effects.
Support? This ain't a football team. Your decision to have a vaccine is a personal one based on your own assessment of risk and tolerance for risk. Unfortunately, most folks aren't well equipped to understand probability well and tend to overstate risks because of typical human emotional bias. I encourage people to make that personal decision while also considering the impact to herd immunity. I also encourage people to keep quiet about it. The issue is not so much the idea of making a rational choice that diverges from the common belief, but loudly expressing one's feelings on the topic. Thus the vegan reference earlier. How do you know someone is a vegan? Don't worry, they'll tell you.
It's fair for anyone to do a reasoned analysis of risk when being asked to undergo vaccination. You are correct in that the technology is novel, the approval was rapid and there are potential side effects. Is this of particular concern? Given the number of people that were vaccinated, and the number of reports of harm, I think not.
My wife and I are currently trying to determine which vaccines to allow the hospital to give our newborn. We’re going as deep as specific brands / manufacturers to limit what we perceive is risk to our baby.
I support you in that endeavor. The vaccination schedule for newborns is needlessly aggressive. If you have the opportunity to keep your infant isolated for some time, then it may be a healthier alternative to proceed at a slower pace. Unfortunately, there's recently been a measles death in Texas, which suggests that the herd immunity is weakening somewhat.
What vaccines would you disallow initially in the hospital for a newborn, if any?
For my kid, I waited until I felt there was a distinct need, i.e. the chances of exposure for the particular ailment being vaccinated for became more likely.
When people hear you decided against the jab they automatically assume you’re an anti vaxxer , conspiracy theorist, and they get angry at you and may even try to refer to you as a vegan.
maybe they regret the jab themselves ?
Generally, people that refer to it as "the jab" quickly establish that they are both anti-vax and have a poor understanding of statistics. I am not angry, but I do have a desire to prevent fools from spreading misinformation.
As for regret, I'm lost. Why would I have any regret?