Venom Lab Boutique - AAS - HGH and Peptides - EU Domestic

Sorry that was me being an idiot, I didn't notice the info. at the beginning of the address!

I was previously looking at cernos depot 1000mg test u and now this has me wondering how they manage to get 1000mg to work without crashing? Would they have to add some other solvents in that case?

thats probably nebido...
4ml shot of 250mg/ml of test u in castor, intended to be used every 12-16 weeks in one single bolus.
 
So few updates:

I was trying to source 360/400IU kit and well it didn't go too well.

I'll be selling this for a crazy stupid low price. Because I just want to get rid of it and recoup if possible part of the money I spent not a dime of profit will be made, more of a controlled loss.

I will not probably offer any other HGH then the lobster one as it is the most consistent in quality I have found around and trust me lately I have spent close to 3k just in HGH labtest and I have thrown in the toilet 3x that amount testing out few different sources buy HGH from them.

If I ever find a high HGH supplier of high concentration kits that can consistently offer it I'll see.

There are 30kits of this 330IU low purity HGH. I'll accept offers for anyone that want to scoop all of them or a good chunk of it.

I'll make it worth it of course.
 

Attachments

  • 1731.webp
    1731.webp
    93.6 KB · Views: 155
Last edited:
i bought recently qsc hgh promo 120 usd for 400iu kits. testing group it tested well and overall his history he has great product.
I'll look into it.
I have one more batch of 360IU that has to be tested another batch of 120IU and another one of 280IU all three still have to land and sent for testing so we will see.
 
I'll look into it.
I have one more batch of 360IU that has to be tested another batch of 120IU and another one of 280IU all three still have to land and sent for testing so we will see.
no worries, i wouldnt waste your time if i didnt think it was worth it. theres ofc the biggest risk that he will exit scam again but thats upto u. he has best quallity on market always. if u catch another promo when it comes thats the best deal i think u can get
 
no worries, i wouldnt waste your time if i didnt think it was worth it. theres ofc the biggest risk that he will exit scam again but thats upto u. he has best quallity on market always. if u catch another promo when it comes thats the best deal i think u can get
He doesn't have the best quality, he never did, he had good consistency and average quality, something that was appreciated for sure but the best quality is far fetched :)
 
He is talking about test D and the difference is 72% vs 66%

So 2ml of test E 400 are less potent than 2ml of test D 500.

Plus test D 500 is pipless for the majority of people, test E 400 is hit and miss.

Test D 500 is a lot smoother in the delivery too and the more you increase the volume of injection the more the difference in total mg of testosterone vs volume of oil become big.

3ml of test E 400 are 864mg of testosterone

3ml of test D 500 are 990
Quite the difference

2ml of test E 400 576mg
2ml of test D 500 660mg

So even 1ml of test D 500 is stronger than 1ml of test E 400.

:)

Your math is not mathing.
Assuming stable levels are reached on both ester.
Why are you comparing test E 400 to test D 500? Of course the D would be stronger per ML it's got a higher concentration of testosterone per ML.

I was comparing like for like, 1ml of test e 400 to 1ml of test D 400 the test E would be stronger as it's a shorter ester and has more testosterone per ML by weight.

Also I do not believe 500mgs of test D will hit harder than 400mgs of test E due to the extended half life. Youd need probably 550-600mgs of D to be equal to E in the short term, perhaps after several months blood levels of testosterone might be higher for one than the other but it's probably an individuals response type thing at that point.

Test D has been around decades there's a reason why it's never been popular.
 
Why are you comparing test E 400 to test D 500? Of course the D would be stronger per ML it's got a higher concentration of testosterone per ML.

I was comparing like for like, 1ml of test e 400 to 1ml of test D 400 the test E would be stronger as it's a shorter ester and has more testosterone per ML by weight.

Also I do not believe 500mgs of test D will hit harder than 400mgs of test E due to the extended half life. Youd need probably 550-600mgs of D to be equal to E in the short term, perhaps after several months blood levels of testosterone might be higher for one than the other but it's probably an individuals response type thing at that point.

Test D has been around decades there's a reason why it's never been popular.
It takes 6 weeks vs 4 weeks to reach peak levels (test D vs test E) so no it hits the same.

Why would you compare test E 400 to test D 400? Lol makes no sense. Test D can be brewed pipless with ease at 500mg why one would brew it at 400mg it defeats the purposes completely.

Can't say the same for test E can you? Even 400mg can be crippling.

You need to compare apple to apple not apple to orange.

Test D hasn't been used because ppl are ignorants and brewers have no clues, 90% of the brewers are still doing test C 200/250mg because that was what they have learned doing. Same for deca that can be easily brewed at 400mg pipless Ans you still see 250mg on average same for EQ 500/600 and many still offer EQ 300 lol

Wanna talk about masteron? When raws where available without any issues they were all still brewing it at 200mg/ml... One of the most retarded things ever seen when it can be brewed at 400mg without any issue.

What about NPP? Yeah 100mg only because at 200 it crash... Yeah nice joke.

Let's agree to disagree, I feel like you come from another era, I don't even touch test E and I offer it only because ppl request it, easy to give pip, raws are problematic and it has no advantages whatsoever over C or D.
 
Hello!

I saw that the idea of a 50/50 MCT / castor oil blend came up. What’s your opinion about Test P in this case if it were prepared this way?
More and more of my friends are reporting that in the summer, when they use Test P instead of Test E (let’s put aside the “short ester = drier look” topic), in some cases they experience much better libido, mood, and stronger erections with short esters.
As we know, Test P is a short ester and it tends to be quite “unstable” even with daily injections, for example when it’s in MCT oil, despite its theoretically ~24-hour half-life. At least, this is what I’ve observed in blood work.
Do you think that if someone uses the propionate ester during TRT or a cruise, in this 50/50 oil ratio, hormone levels would be more stable?
This is just curiosity, and feel free to correct me if I wrote something incorrectly — I like to learn.
 
Hello!

I saw that the idea of a 50/50 MCT / castor oil blend came up. What’s your opinion about Test P in this case if it were prepared this way?
More and more of my friends are reporting that in the summer, when they use Test P instead of Test E (let’s put aside the “short ester = drier look” topic), in some cases they experience much better libido, mood, and stronger erections with short esters.
As we know, Test P is a short ester and it tends to be quite “unstable” even with daily injections, for example when it’s in MCT oil, despite its theoretically ~24-hour half-life. At least, this is what I’ve observed in blood work.
Do you think that if someone uses the propionate ester during TRT or a cruise, in this 50/50 oil ratio, hormone levels would be more stable?
This is just curiosity, and feel free to correct me if I wrote something incorrectly — I like to learn.

So I'm not an expert but from my experience there are two wrong assumptions that you are making.

First one: the belief that carrier oil influence the metabolization of a substance so much to make a big difference. It doesn't. A substance in full castor oil may have a delayed absorption of maybe few hours.
A mix of castor and MCT will have a even less meaningful impact.

The reason for mixing carrier oils is not to extend half-life or delay onset is for the properties of some carrier oils have, like decreasing inflammation, a slightly painkiller effect, antimicrobial etc. Changing the viscosity of the oil as well.

I have found that thinning the oil too much make it yes easier to inject with slinpin but it's very easy for leaking subq and those become nasty very quick.

Second wrong assumption: thinking that the more stable the levels of an hormone the better you will feel. This is a paradox but if you do limit the side with stable levels you at the same time limit all those "positive sides" like raging libido.

If you have cycled for a while you will notice that usually you have an increased libido at the Start of a cycle and then it plateau around mid cycle and continue to slowly decrease or stay stay the same the longer you go.

This is because the body adapts to the level of hormones and it becomes the new baseline for that time.

Prop gives you stronger libido erection etc exactly because you have continuous peak and valleys. If you try to extend the half-life making it more stable you will defeat exactly that precise effect it gives you.

Of course with more pronounced peak and valley there can be more sides but Because chemically speaking sides are not just the "bad" one, sides is to whole plethora of effects a substance gives you some are considers positive and some negative.

These are my 2cents and not the universal truth
 
@Venom Lab

It’s great to see you take time to answer questions from your perspective!

I was looking at your Reta in the list. Was it tested by you or any client? I’m thinking about adding Reta to my TRT routine, been on Tirze (official) but it totally my appetite
 
Back
Top