Understanding Finnrick Testing

[47Ronin]

Question?

If I send for example Reta 30 mg for testing l and it comes back 3.5 out of 4 on purity, 2.5 out of 4 on quantity and 0 out of 0 on identifier does that mean it tested somewhere around 22 mg?

And if the identifier shows 0 does that mean it’s fake?

How could it test over %75 on purity if the actual drug can not be found?

Can somebody explain?

 

[IndividualMan]

this testing site is incredibly shit. just go off jano tests.
Finrick is missing the point. at soem point they gave points for packaging i believe.

 

[SonnataS]

The identifier is the batch/lot identifier, not substance identity. Most peptide kits come with a batch identifier label on the kit container or the vials themselves. Finnrick asks for this batch identifier when your submit your sample application. If your kit doesn't come with one or you forget to submit this, Finnrick will penalize the identity score.

The scoring isn't a ratio of a 100% scale. So 3.5/4 isn't 88%. Instead it's their own slotted criteria. For example a purity scoring between 3.3/4 and 4/4 ranges 99.5% and 99.9%

Purity 3.5/4 means your probably sitting around 99.7% purity identified as Reta.

Quantity of 2.5/4 is roughly a deviation of around 10% of your stated quantity, so you're probably either overfilled or underfilled by %10.

TLDR - You're good bro. You have Reta sitting at around 99.7% purity, within 10% of the stated 30mg amount.

 

[johnjay06]

Finnrick is shit. Don’t trust their garbage testing

 

[Photon]

Testing and Rating Methodology - Finnrick Analytics

Finnrick tests peptide samples, scores those tests, and rates vendors with independent lab results. Our transparent evaluation system drives change towards better product quality and safety.

www.finnrick.com

 

[ParquetPatquet]

Lab G is BT Labs, BTW. I cannot vouch for them since I've never used them.