heavydutygorilla
New Member
Tren is on point! Rounding out week 2 with it and smooth, pip free and quality!
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
sp5der - QUALITY US DOMESTIC
- Thread starter sp5der
- Start date
Use this to ensure accurate mg/ml assuming you have accurate purity on raw API...
Get the raw data from Jano. Calculate the purity from the raw data. You understand the concept of confidence intervals.
Dial in your product concentrations within 1% error. Another opportunity for you to lead instead of being happy with status quo.
There are links to high quality volumetric flasks (various sizes) in another thread if you search it up.
Let's see who can nail their finished product concentration.
Happy Holidays.
Last edited:
Coffezilla
Member
Yea waiting until I can place my large order already have a ton of guys giving me great feedback
Coffezilla
Member
When are you going to start brewing for us brother
Ateam2023
Member
I was a little caught off guard with the comment how he is more careful with girls dosing than with Mens doses(i understand the need for women) , I just don't quite understand that, has it become the "norm" to just overshoot rather than be under mg wise When it comes to men's doses? heaven's forbid that it's actually spot on or close as you can get. I realize a "spot on" is never gonna happen because even with Pharma it's not spot on. Am I missing something or?
As someone who has a wife running test and anavar I appreciate this. The consequences are far worse for women.
sp5der
Subscriber
I to be as accurate as possible but it’s not that simple. Unless you make one single vial at a time you can’t get 250mg/ml every time. Janoshik has variances on his raw purity testing and also finished product testing. With products for guys it’s easier to account for jano purity to be lower than represented and hit a little higher on your finished product. For women products I’d rather come in a little lower than higher so the purity adjustment made isn’t the same.
There’s room for improvements with volumetric flasks, which will help, and I’ll look into implementing that I haven’t shopped for any yet but it will be done.
Last edited:
sp5der
Subscriber
And yes you can get close and be consistent. But even with a $7000 scale you can’t be perfect. There’s 200mg/ml pharma test out there that test at 181mg/ml.
Scale only gets you accurate API weight. Vol flask gets you accurate final volume. You need both to achieve spot on mg/ml.
Displacement calculators not needed if you want to do high accuracy work.
Last edited:
Compounding pharmacy.
104%
He can do better than them if interested. Only sharing this stuff with the vendors who may be interested in leveraging the info.
Good questions.
Last edited:
If you want to learn something fun (if you haven't already) ask @janoshik about two terms:
1. Method precision
2. Instrument precision
He has shared some of this info previously here on this forum.
Take a hypothetical example of a Test Cyp raw and Test Cyp finished oil product.
Relative St. Dev. (RSD) for 1 and 2 for both a raw product test and finished oil test? Then propagate the errors. So if you were perfect every time on your weights and volumes what would be the confidence interval on a finished product based on Jano's reported method precisions?
How much credit would the analytical testing confidence intervals give you for being say <= +/- 0.1% error or better on API mass and finished product volume?
Last edited:
Similar threads
