Republicans 2016

Hoboken blackmail charge worse than Bridgegate: Moran
Hoboken blackmail charge is worse than Bridgegate: Moran | NJ.com

This one is beyond ugly. Because in the end, Zimmer did get shorted. Hoboken got $342,000, a pittance for a town that was 80 percent under water after the October 2012 storm. She had requested $127 million.

This is a credible charge. Zimmer is describing the same kind of thuggish behavior from the Christie administration that we saw during Bridgegate.

But this one cuts deeper. Leaving people stranded in horrid traffic for four days is bad enough. But denying aid to victims of Sandy as a means of leverage against an elected official is simply revolting. And surely illegal.

Time for U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman to jump on this. And the Legislature should ramp up an investigation as well.
 
Hoboken mayor discussed Chris Christie, Sandy aid allegations with U.S. Attorney, she says
Hoboken mayor discussed Chris Christie, Sandy aid allegations with U.S. Attorney, she says | NJ.com

Hoboken Mayor Dawn Zimmer said she met with federal prosecutors today, a day after she alleged members of Gov. Chris Christie’s administration threatened to withhold Hurricane Sandy aid from her city if she did not approve a real estate project.


U.S. Attorney Said to Meet With Hoboken Mayor
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/20/n...html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=tw-nytimes&_r=0

“They came and they made a direct threat,” Ms. Zimmer said, referring to Ms. Guadagno and another state official. She said she believed that Hoboken would have received much more of the post-storm aid state officials handed out if she had done as told and switched to supporting the development project.

The United States attorney for New Jersey, Paul J. Fishman, had already begun a review of allegations that associates of Mr. Christie sought to punish the mayor of Fort Lee in September by ordering the closing of lanes of traffic leading from his borough to the George Washington Bridge. Rebekah Carmichael, a spokeswoman for Mr. Fishman, declined to comment on Ms. Zimmer’s assertions.
 
President Chris Christie
https://medium.com/the-nib/33fdab6a9ef3

12754
 

Attachments

  • 1-mf7mWKVV9_g3gIP5YSBv7A.jpeg
    1-mf7mWKVV9_g3gIP5YSBv7A.jpeg
    312.7 KB · Views: 19
Hoboken Mayor Is Said to Have Told of Threat
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/23/n...o-have-told-of-threat.html?smid=tw-share&_r=2

Federal authorities in New Jersey have interviewed several witnesses who said the mayor of Hoboken told them in May about a state official’s threat to withhold hurricane recovery funds if the mayor did not support a development project favored by the governor, people briefed on the matter said on Wednesday.

The statements by the witnesses, two of whom are aides to the mayor, Dawn Zimmer, support the account she gave to federal prosecutors on Sunday, and the interviews suggest that prosecutors and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have moved swiftly to investigate her accusations.

The aides said she had told them about the threat by Lt. Gov. Kim Guadagno, shortly after it occurred, according to two people briefed on the matter.

A Hoboken city councilman, David Mello, said in an interview that Ms. Zimmer had also told him about the threat by Ms. Guadagno, a Republican. Mr. Mello, a Democrat, said he had been upset to hear about what he called “this quid pro quo ultimatum by the lieutenant governor.”

The allegation first surfaced on Saturday when Ms. Zimmer, in an interview on MSNBC, said that the threat was made by Ms. Guadagno in a parking lot in May. Ms. Zimmer said Ms. Guadagno told her that federal Hurricane Sandy recovery funds and money for fortifying her city against another storm would depend on her support for the development project. The mayor said Ms. Guadagno said that Gov. Chris Christie had sent her to deliver that message because the project was so important to him.

Late on Sunday, Ms. Zimmer said in a statement that she had been interviewed about her accusations earlier in the day by prosecutors in the office of the New Jersey United States attorney, Paul J. Fishman, and provided them with documents, including a diary in which she had memorialized her encounter with Ms. Guadagno.

Mr. Fishman’s office was already conducting a preliminary review of allegations that several of Mr. Christie’s aides and appointees, including his deputy chief of staff, had ordered the closing of two approach lanes to the George Washington Bridge in what was apparently an act of political retribution. A spokeswoman for Mr. Fishman’s office, Rebekah Carmichael, would neither confirm nor deny that Ms. Zimmer had been interviewed and declined to comment on her assertions.

On Monday, Ms. Guadagno disputed Ms. Zimmer’s account of their meeting, and denied she had made any threat in connection with the large commercial development project, which was to be on property owned by the Rockefeller Group, which is represented by the law firm of one of Mr. Christie’s closest associates, David Samson.

“Mayor Zimmer’s version of our conversation in May of 2013 is not only false, but is illogical and does not withstand scrutiny when all of the facts are examined,” Ms. Guadagno said at an event to commemorate the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday. “Any suggestion that Sandy funds were tied to the approval of any project in New Jersey is completely false.”

Ms. Zimmer’s spokesman, Juan Melli, would not discuss whether her aides had been interviewed, saying, “The U.S. attorney’s office has asked that we not conduct additional media interviews and we are respecting their request.”
 
For Christie, Politics Team Kept a Focus on Two Races
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/29/n...olitics-team-kept-a-focus-on-two-bids.html?hp

His campaign called them “the Top 100,” the swing towns that Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey wanted to win as he prepared for a re-election campaign. Capturing these towns, sometimes referred to as mini-Ohios or mini-Floridas, would validate the governor’s argument that he would be the most broadly appealing Republican choice for president in 2016.

Staff members in the governor’s office created tabbed and color-coded dossiers on the mayors of each town — who their friends and enemies were, the policies and projects that were dear to them — that were bound in notebooks for the governor to review in his S.U.V. between events.

Long after most of the State House had been shuttered for the night, Mr. Christie’s aides worked on spreadsheets, documenting calls and meetings with key players in the towns — one Republican called it “political Moneyball” — as the governor tried to win endorsements and friends.

Officially known as “intergovernmental affairs,” the operation was a key element of the permanent campaign that allowed Mr. Christie to win twice in a largely Democratic state. It was led by Bill Stepien, his two-time campaign manager and deputy chief of staff, and then by Bridget Anne Kelly, who succeeded him in his role in the governor’s office.

They were part of what one high-ranking Republican called “the crew” around Mr. Christie: friends who strategized at Mr. Christie’s kitchen table in Mendham and socialized with him in the governor’s box at MetLife Stadium.

Now this operation is at the heart of the growing scandal over the closing of lanes at the George Washington Bridge in an act of political retribution against the mayor of Fort Lee, N.J.

Mr. Christie has said that he had not been aware of his office’s involvement in the maneuver, and nothing has directly tied to him to it. But a close look at his operation and how intimately he was involved in it, described in interviews with dozens of people — Republican and Democrat, including current and former Christie administration officials, elected leaders and legislative aides — gives credence to the puzzlement expressed by some Republicans and many Democrats in the state, who question how a detail-obsessed governor could have been unaware of the closings or the effort over months to cover up the political motive.
 
How Pressure Mounted for Development in Hoboken
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/30/n...s-pushed-a-project-in-new-jersey.html?hp&_r=0

HOBOKEN, N.J. — Last May 8, a severe rainstorm left the streets of this city flooded once again, causing the mayor, Dawn Zimmer, to recall the inundation from Hurricane Sandy.

So she dashed off a letter to Gov. Chris Christie, imploring him to help with Hoboken’s “ongoing flooding emergency,” and attached photos of cars in water up to their hoods. She was due to meet the next day with officials of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, when she hoped to talk about protecting Hoboken from the next catastrophic deluge to come.

But according to newly obtained emails sent among the participants, the first topic of discussion on the agenda was “review of concepts for flood control measures at Rockefeller property,” a reference to a billion-dollar office complex proposed at the north end of town. The developer, the Rockefeller Group, which had long been trying to gain approval from local officials, sent two executives, two lobbyists and an engineer to the meeting.
 
Perkinsnacht
Liberal vituperation makes our letter writer's point.
Perkinsnacht - WSJ.com

Five days on, the commentariat continues to drop anvils on Tom Perkins, who may have written the most-read letter to the editor in the history of The Wall Street Journal. The irony is that the vituperation is making our friend's point about liberal intolerance—maybe better than he did.

"I perceive a rising tide of hatred of the successful one percent," wrote the legendary venture capitalist and a founder of Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers. Mr. Perkins called it "a very dangerous drift in our American thinking. Kristallnacht was unthinkable in 1930; is its descendant 'progressive' radicalism unthinkable now?"

That comparison was unfortunate, albeit provocative. It's not always easy to be subtle in 186 words, as Mr. Perkins learned, though a useful rule of thumb is not to liken anything to Nazi Germany unless it happens to be the Stalinist Soviet Union. Amid the ongoing media furor and an ungallant rebuke from Kleiner Perkins, Mr. Perkins has apologized for the comparison, without repudiating his larger argument.

While claiming to be outraged at the Nazi reference, the critics seem more incensed that Mr. Perkins dared to question the politics of economic class warfare. The boys at Bloomberg View—we read them since no one else does—devoted an entire editorial to inequality and Mr. Perkins's "unhinged Nazi rant." Others denounced him for defending his former wife Danielle Steel, and even for owning too many Rolex watches.

Maybe the critics are afraid that Mr. Perkins is onto something about the left's political method. Consider the recent record of liberals in power. They're the ones obsessed with the Koch brothers and other billionaires contributing to conservative causes, siccing journalists to trash them and federal agencies to shut them down.

President Obama's IRS targeted conservative political groups for scrutiny in an election year and has now formalized that scrutiny in new regulatory "guidance" for this election year. Democratic prosecutors in Wisconsin unleashed a special prosecutor to target conservative groups allied with Governor Scott Walker. A judge threw out the subpoenas as baseless but only after months of legal harassment and dawn police raids.

Or take New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who said in a recent radio interview that, "If they are extreme conservatives, they have no place in the state of New York." He said he meant people who oppose gay marriage or abortion, or favor legal assault weapons. He didn't say they were wrong. He said get out of the state.

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio then chimed in to say Mr. Cuomo was "absolutely right," throwing in a riff about "crippling inequality" for no extra charge. Like Mr. de Blasio, Mr. Obama doesn't merely want to raise taxes on the rich to finance the government. He says "millionaires and billionaires" simply make too much money and deserve to be punished. Or as they say at the New York Times, NYT -1.78% they are "the undeserving rich." By the way, does that include the third-generation rentiers in the Sulzberger family?

The liberals aren't encouraging violence, but they are promoting personal vilification and the abuse of government power to punish political opponents.
 
Christie Knew About Lane Closings, Ex-Port Authority Official Says
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/01/nyregion/christie-bridge.html?smid=fb-share

The former Port Authority official who personally oversaw the lane closings on the George Washington Bridge in the scandal now swirling around Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey said on Friday that the governor knew about the lane closings when they were happening, and that he had the evidence to prove it.

In a letter released by his lawyer, the official, David Wildstein, a high school friend of Mr. Christie’s who was appointed with the governor’s blessing at the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which controls the bridge, described the order to close the lanes as “the Christie administration’s order” and said “evidence exists as well tying Mr. Christie to having knowledge of the lane closures, during the period when the lanes were closed, contrary to what the governor stated publicly in a two-hour press conference” three weeks ago.

“Mr. Wildstein contests the accuracy of various statements that the governor made about him and he can prove the inaccuracy of some,” the letter added.

The letter marked the first signal that Mr. Christie may have been aware of the closings, something he repeatedly denied during thenews conference.

In early January, documents revealed that a deputy chief of staff to Mr. Christie, Bridget Anne Kelly, had sent an email to Mr. Wildstein saying, “Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee,” the town at the New Jersey end of the bridge, where Mr. Christie’s aides had pursued but failed to receive an endorsement from the mayor.

Mr. Christie has steadfastly denied that he knew before this month that anyone in his administration was responsible for the lane closings, and his administration has tried to portray it as the actions of a rogue staff member.

The governor fired Ms. Kelly. Mr. Wildstein, the director of interstate capital projects at the Port Authority, resigned.
 
Last edited:
12978


12979


12980


12981
 

Attachments

  • BfZQmj3CQAAOt3w.jpg
    BfZQmj3CQAAOt3w.jpg
    98 KB · Views: 18
  • BfZQeY2CEAA0fo-.jpg
    BfZQeY2CEAA0fo-.jpg
    215.2 KB · Views: 18
  • BfZQTX7CAAEngvL.jpg
    BfZQTX7CAAEngvL.jpg
    104.7 KB · Views: 18
  • BfZQD-qCEAAGan-.jpg
    BfZQD-qCEAAGan-.jpg
    139.8 KB · Views: 18

Attachments

Christie's Office Attacks Claims of Former Ally's Lawyer
Governor Challenges Allegation He Knew of Bridge Disruptions Earlier Than He Has Said
Christie's Office Attacks Claims of Former Ally Wildstein's Lawyer - WSJ.com

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's administration has attacked the motives of a former ally whose attorney claims the GOP presidential hopeful knew of highly disruptive lane closures on a New York area bridge as they were going on, contrary to the governor's previous statements.

Mr. Christie's office challenged the claims of his former associate, David Wildstein, in a public statement on Saturday. "Bottom line—David Wildstein will do and say anything to save David Wildstein," said the message, first reported by Politico and reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.
 
Well, That Escalated Quickly
Well, That Escalated Quickly

Over Chinese food at the fabulous Lao Sze Chuan in Milford, Ct. I had the pleasure of reading Chris Christie’s 700-word-long attack on David Wildstein and the New York Times. This came moments after I opened a fortune cookie that advised me to “Enjoy yourself while you can.” (!)

I am trying to summon the requisite mood to seriously ponder the implications of the email that Governor Christie apparently sent to supporters/donors/ Politico/Beltway Republicans (as if there’s any… never mind). But I can’t. I just can’t.

It is hard for me to believe that the governor of an American state could author such a piece of risible juvenilia, except it is even harder for me to believe a paid communications professional could have been behind this. The “argument” Christie (or possibly one very very close longtime advisor) is making here is that David Wildstein is a bad guy.

Why?

Because as a “a 16-year-old kid” he filed a lawsuit over a school board election and was “publicly accused by his high school social studies teacher of deceptive behavior.” Because he was, according to Christie, a “tumultuous” person (not the correct usage of that word, Governor, but whatever). Because he was “a political animal” who had “a controversial tenure” as the mayor of Livingston. Because he “made moves that were not productive.”
 
Back
Top