iris
New Member
Did I read a post by the owner here, recently, in response to "disgruntled ex members"?
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Readalots Enhanced Testing
- Thread starter Dirthand
- Start date
bigMoJo
Member
That's your response bro? That? You linked THAT for me to read?
CURVEBALL ASKED YOU WHY YOU DON'T DEFEND MILLARD AT SST?
WHAT IS YOUR RESPONSE?
curveball2025
Member
Once again, it is about YOU.....
curveball2025
Member
My question was simply why he won't defend Millard. That is it. Simple.
Evident you didn't read the post. It wasn't about me.
curveball2025
Member
@readalot I truly enjoy my conversations with you, but unfortunately my wife asked me to stop playing and go have lunch. I am sure we will talk later.
Peace!
Peace!
I am not involved with the financial transactions or sponsors here at Millard's forum. Without that information how could I possibly form an educated opinion about the critiques leveled against him? And why would I share an opinion on something I am not educated on.
Full disclosure: I did reach out to him via DM and he took the time to write back to me with information that in my mind convinces me he walks the talk.
Why are you asking me why I don't defend Millard on another forum? Very surprising.
I am a member here and derive zero financial gain from any of this. I have spoken out on numerous occasions that Meso (and so far SST) are the only forums I could do something like I've done to increase testing scope. Millard's actions to date speak volumes to whether he believes the words he wrote on the wall.
Last edited:
iris
New Member
The owner does not need defending, he is extremely capable of doing so himself.
Readalot is there as a member not as a Meso spokesperson; is he not?
And if he were to defend him, after what I read in the screenshot you provided, he would get slaughtered.
He is not the only Meso member, there, right?
Has anyone spoken up in defence?
You are going to say that he should because of the level of support he has been receiving from the top, right?
But then his whole project gets tied to a specific place and individual when, from what I understand, this is just a platform for it.
If he does not want it to be "a Meso thing", some neutrality should be maintained.
I might be wrong, so please say.
I understand why you are asking that question, seeing as there have been direct interventions on this and other threads about the testing ideas.
But if harm reduction is the ethos of this forum, it is not surprising the owner felt compelled to address the matter, especially when things started getting heated.
Was trying to edit previous post but timed out. So reproducing here so I can type it all.
MSG Quote:
"This guy gets it."
@T-Bagger, there it is. I know you were curious.
@Liter O' Test fyi.
Reproduced below for convenience. Reading through the QSC thread this issue appears to be largely why MSG left (IMO) from my reading. Very difficult to combat without administrative action.
So there you go. Keep going down the rabbit hole. Trying to improve testing scope and frequency just uncovers and daylights much bigger issues.
MSG Quote:
"This guy gets it."
@T-Bagger, there it is. I know you were curious.
@Liter O' Test fyi.
Reproduced below for convenience. Reading through the QSC thread this issue appears to be largely why MSG left (IMO) from my reading. Very difficult to combat without administrative action.
So there you go. Keep going down the rabbit hole. Trying to improve testing scope and frequency just uncovers and daylights much bigger issues.
Last edited:
Why do you think I'd be called out to defend the owner of this site given the prior posting history of that member? What is his motivation for that?
Genuinely curious your thoughts. You think he is trying to debate and dialogue with me in earnest?.
Would any of this be allowed on another AAS board? Serious. There's been a lot of hinting I'm a puppet as well. Plus see Narta's previous posts.
If all these posts stay up I guess everyone will have their answer.
curveball2025
Member
My point in all of this, and there is a point, was to show that hijacking any thread and being a belligerent prick (regardless of alleged intent), does not accomplish anything other than pissing people off and makes the thread unbearable. You took it upon yourself to do this in multiple threads and it got you nowhere. It made you enemies, who could have been allies if your approach was different.
I believe additional harm reduction is a legitimate concern. I believe Meso is a place where a difference can be made.
I just hope that a different, lasting approach will be taken moving forward so that reading through threads does not become a burden for all.
Did I make my point? I hope so. You can have your thread back.
I believe additional harm reduction is a legitimate concern. I believe Meso is a place where a difference can be made.
I just hope that a different, lasting approach will be taken moving forward so that reading through threads does not become a burden for all.
Did I make my point? I hope so. You can have your thread back.
Liter O' Test
Member
which of your threads did he ruin?
yeah reading comments is such a burden you had to spend hours of your own time being an emotional shill in this thread to "prove a point", seems much more personal to you.
"haha i was just pretending to be a retarded shill alt account stirring shit up to make a point, jokes on you"
Last edited:
RandallFlagg
Member
Along with "don't feed the trolls..."
Let's try to reduce the "trolling each other."
Its too easy to get riled up on a keyboard. I almost posted some bitch little reply about the snarky messages and then realized that would just make me a bitch. We can all be better to each other.
But glad we're all trying to work through history and make the conversation more productive.
Let's try to reduce the "trolling each other."
Its too easy to get riled up on a keyboard. I almost posted some bitch little reply about the snarky messages and then realized that would just make me a bitch. We can all be better to each other.
But glad we're all trying to work through history and make the conversation more productive.
AlexDavis43
Member
People at SST are already getting annoyed with him, and defending Millard (or Meso) will worsen this.
It's like a team sport for some - "you're either with me or against me" - "Meso or SST" - pick a side.
Zebedee
Member
Aye.
That said, personally I’m not interested in reading on Meso about what’s being said on SST about ET, readalot, QSC, Millard etc. If I want to know what’s happening & being said & by whom on SST, I’ll go look at SST.
Nothing to do with tribalism / “teams” for me, just to add - can’t be arsed with that childish bollocks.
AlexDavis43
Member
I'm trying to follow along and links to SST are constantly being posted. If you don't click the links and make a comment that may have missed some essential context in one of the links, then you may be called out for not caring enough to click the links.
If you're proposing to keep this conversation either on Meso or SST and not cross-pollinating, that's something different.
UncleBuns
Member
Ah yes, the solution to something you find obnoxious is to do the exact same thing and become an obnoxious eyesore. You know you can ignore specific users and you won't see there posts? Whether or not you agree with or like Readalot or agree with his tactics he is actually moving forward the level of testing and safety in the UGL world. You on the other hand have added a mass shit posts into the forum and done nothing of value.
You are very self righteous for an adult man masquerading as a 16 year old internet troll. Shut up and do something productive.
Also, this is technically Dirthand's thread.
Spaceman Spiff
Subscriber
I kind of ignored everything else going for a minute,
just say you are a piece of shit.
Zebedee
Member
That’s the one mate.
