QSC HGH 10 iu

[jdubzzz44]

Factors that Diminish GH Response (↓Δ IGF-I); The Purpose of the Serum IGF-I Test: A Revision (2.0) [Author: Type-IIx]

This writing is intended to replace and supersede The Serum IGF-I Test: Its... (version 1.0; Nov 23 2021). The Serum GH is utterly useless for any purpose we'd be interested in. The Serum IGF-I test is what's used to determine GH response (Δ IGF-I). Factors that diminish GH response (↓ Δ...

thinksteroids.com

people used to do it a long time ago to make sure HGH was real. this was before the ease of accessibility to HPLC testing.

I would say it is a dated practice that steroid buyers would do and now serves no purpose.

its a pulsatile level that can vary in response.

Tons of gh serum tests out there from this year and last year so not sure what you mean by dated. A large blous will have a steady rise and peak that’s easily predictable, no pulses.

I don’t see how a test that measures growth hormone serves no purpose when we are trying to measure growth hormone but go ahead and keep parroting what llx says

 

[BrokenOne]

I treat them as 10iu, just about to start the 24iu's and I'll be treating them as 27iu to start with. But thats mainly because I had some major water retention issues after my last increase in dose and I've only just got it under control and don't want to do another jump up in dosage again by accident when changing to the 24iu vials.

 

[Sector]

examples? not confrontative, simply curious

I believe jdubbz and dirthand (in the thread) said they were taking it, and posted less than ideal numbers with bloodwork pictures to support it, but there might be other examples in the "serum blood testing" or "analytical lab testing sections". I'm too lazy to try to piece together everyones experiences with the source

 

[hghlover]

So what, janoshik tests say 95%+ but bloodwork comes back shit?

 

[Dirthand]

So what, janoshik tests say 95%+ but bloodwork comes back shit?

There is a lot of factors as to why a o persons igf1 can be In bad response to taking gh

 

[hghlover]

There is a lot of factors as to why a o persons igf1 can be In bad response to taking gh

True

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Tons of gh serum tests out there from this year and last year so not sure what you mean by dated. A large blous will have a steady rise and peak that’s easily predictable, no pulses.

I don’t see how a test that measures growth hormone serves no purpose when we are trying to measure growth hormone but go ahead and keep parroting what llx says

When they measure response to RHGH in clinical trials, do they go off of GH serum or IGF1?

Rhetorical question

 

[UncleBuns]

There are quite a few test over the last couple years for their 10iu vials.

 

[AlexDavis43]

When they measure response to RHGH in clinical trials, do they go off of GH serum or IGF1?

Rhetorical question

My understanding is serum GH is a quick and dirty way to go about things.

And this way at least you get to use the GH instead of sending it away for testing. It should show a positive response if the GH is good.

A little better than roidtests. Not as good as sending it out for a Jano test.