Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

[Clover 0080]

My bad, then I don't want to take away anything from the new lady.

Is not the first time I call a she a he in this forum.

Last time I called a lady "brother" (in my defence she had a clover as an avi)

Technically I still am a brother even with a gyna

 

[IronJohnDoe]

Technically I still am a brother even with a gyna

It was you! Lol

Why couldn't you be a sister?

Now I can't mistake you with your updated avi, looking great by the way Sister!

 

[Clover 0080]

I remember when I was a lurker not able to post. And then one day some drunk lunatic came on here randomly picking my name and saying I was his wife and a rep for tracy. Got me banned by Tracy and I couldnt even defend myself. Im assuming he just looked at all the users currently online and picked my name but I was sitting here fuming not able to even say a word lol. Luckily I was able to get myself unbanned the next day

 

[chmuse]

My bad, then I don't want to take away anything from the new lady.

Is not the first time I call a she a he in this forum.

Last time I called a lady "brother" (in my defence she had a clover as an avi)

No offense taken. I did choose a fish as my avatar.

 

[RandallFlagg]

I remember when I was a lurker not able to post. And then one day some drunk lunatic came on here randomly picking my name and saying I was his wife and a rep for tracy. Got me banned by Tracy and I couldnt even defend myself. Im assuming he just looked at all the users currently online and picked my name but I was sitting here fuming not able to even say a word lol. Luckily I was able to get myself unbanned the next day

That was definitely a unique, unforgettable introduction. Glad it was resolved quickly (I totally didn't believe you were a separate person for about 15 minutes after your explanation...just sobered up from the meth...lol)

 

[JuiceStick]

In your example it fails at self knowledge, not math. Here’s a description of the capability and how it is distinct from the 4o model:

https://openai.com/index/learning-to-reason-with-llms/

In my experience it works quite well. Like any of these tools, it doesn’t absolve one from reasoning and verification, but it certainly accelerates certain activities.

It is quite good at statistics and I am not. In that sense I find it to be beneficial.

We may have a different understanding of a term 'reasoning'. If you read the article you just quoted (or make chat summarize it), you'll find that it has nothing to do with mathematical computations. It's all about chain of thought and validating it's conclusions. I still stand by my original statement - LLMs can't count. They may call plugins or guess the result, but they cannot count.

 

[egruberman]

you'll find that it has nothing to do with mathematical computations. It's all about chain of thought and validating it's conclusions

Nothing? It describes how it has improved performance over 4o in a math benchmark. It wasn’t intended to prove anything other than the distinction between it and previous models. I’ve read elsewhere that some of the RL done was specifically intended to increase performance in mathematics.

It's all about chain of thought and validating it's conclusions. I still stand by my original statement - LLMs can't count. They may call plugins or guess the result, but they cannot count.

It seems you want to stand on semantics. My original assertion was that 4o1 is good at math. Your counter-argument to that was that it can’t count, which is true in a sense, but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s still really good at math.

 

[readalot]

You are missing quite a lot because you are wrong about everything here.

Good to know. Please educate me when you get a chance. Thanks.

 

[xxBIGDAWGxx]

Joined Wed. 8 posts. Lemme guess? You paid the upgrade fee?

Well yeah… it cost me 5 vials of tren

 

[Grey Spartan]

Kinda funny you mention that ... for me personally I think i am more of an asshole/ smart ass off tren than when on tren.. When on tren to be way to serious and extremely focused.
Not saying i though you were being a smart ass or an asshole btw

Same. The focus is AMAZING (for someone with ADHD)

I tell ya, I’m liking this ChatGPT fella. He’s the opposite of my wife. She doesn’t compliment my IQ, at all.

I think we have the same wife. lol

Probability and Statistics is no joke, some of the dullest reading I have encountered.

I had to drop it on my first attempt.

Read The Drunkard's Walk by Leonard Mlodinow

 

[LGOP528]

Same. The focus is AMAZING (for someone with ADHD)

I think we have the same wife. lol

Read The Drunkard's Walk by Leonard Mlodinow

Would you call me a nerd if I said that actually sounds interesting? They have it as a book on tape too!

 

[Clover 0080]

How do you guys cook lobster

 

[IronJohnDoe]

That is kind of crazy it is open to the public with no account registration.

 

[Heatheopia]

I got different oils from QSC and from everything i had different batches. Sometimes the color was slightly different between batches. All was legit.

Thanks

 

[AlexDavis43]

How do you guys cook lobster

Split it in half lengthwise and on the grill. Or if you're less adventurous, boiled whole.

Rock paper scissors for who gets the tomalley.

 

[Clover 0080]

Split it in half lengthwise and on the grill. Or if you're less adventurous, boiled whole.

Rock paper scissors for who gets the tomalley.

Do you snort that part

 

[Dirthand]

Do you snort that part

No you gotta dump truck it straight to the bloodstream of the anus

 

[xxBIGDAWGxx]

No you gotta dump truck it straight to the bloodstream of the anus

Hand stand anus chugging

 

[JuiceStick]

Nothing? It describes how it has improved performance over 4o in a math benchmark. It wasn’t intended to prove anything other than the distinction between it and previous models. I’ve read elsewhere that some of the RL done was specifically intended to increase performance in mathematics.

"Performance" as in making less mistakes when guessing the answer. It still doesn't count or compute. It does its best to guess the correct answer using some learned answers. Often it is correct. But since it doesn't do real math without plugins, it's important to verify it's results. LLMs are known to hallucinate with realistic responses which may lead to false sense of security.

LLMs are very powerful productivity tools. But it's important to understand their limitations. I wouldn't trust LLM math (or even LLM answers without fact checking) with anything where the wrong result may cause risk to health or injury.

 

[AlexDavis43]

Do you snort that part

No you gotta dump truck it straight to the bloodstream of the anus

Do whatever but at least save a little to eat. It's delicious.