Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

Very limited experience with this company but I had an issue a few months back with customs, I had to travel for 3 months, I couldn't wait around. I was fully refunded by Tracy and welcomed back with a new order just this week.

Maybe it's how things are handled on both sides that sets a persons attitude, come with a good attitude get a good attitude back in return.

Shit happens, I been at this over 15 years!
That's impressive if fully refunded actual money and not just reship.
 
I have no issues with injection but my wife is having a reaction at injection site. Its slightly itchy oval shaped red spot/blotch about 2 inches that appears the next day and will last for 5 to 7 days.

Someone I'm coaching started having site reactions to tirzepatide. I had them try different batches, different bac water, all to no avail. They had a history of allergic reactions and even tried a prescription antihistamine, but eventually reverted to semaglutide.

Based on anecdotal reports, it seems that site reactions are relatively common with tirzepatide. I could only find maybe one reference in the literature with no real guidance as to how to proceed.
 
I wonder how many $150,000 / year federal agents are assigned to monitor this forum for occasional pics of packing material.

Thank god they'd never spend $75 on an order to see for themselves, right, guardians of opsec?
Why assign someone to this forum when it's so easy to automatically scrape this forum along with a ton of other high probability sites, run potential text/imagery through a classifier, and then forward high probability hits to a desk at CBP?

Yeah, a single image is unlikely to really be a problem, but why take the risk, eh? All it does is potentially screw a vendor and their customers, right?

Mezo seems to have this discussion every so often and the general consensus seemed to be to err on the side of caution and not post images of what is stealth packaging. Letting another new member know this politely seemed appropriate.
 
All China packs get inspected and matched to the algorithm of source board forum pic databases didn't you know?

Why assign someone to this forum when it's so easy to automatically scrape this forum along with a ton of other high probability sites, run potential text/imagery through a classifier, and then forward high probability hits to a desk at CBP?

Yeah, a single image is unlikely to really be a problem, but why take the risk, eh? All it does is potentially screw a vendor and their customers, right?

Mezo seems to have this discussion every so often and the general consensus seemed to be to err on the side of caution and not post images of what is stealth packaging. Letting another new member know this politely seemed appropriate.

Sure, err on the side of caution but let's use some common sense here.

No one is bothering to surveil forums for packaging pics, sending out intelligence bulletins that some eagle eyed customs officer will memorize or refer to when enforcement is not done based on visual inspectors who are fooled by packaging tricks like its 1982.

A tiny percentage of packages are actually selected for inspection. They're sent through a 6 position density scanner that's not dissimilar to an MRI, The device is connected to a system that analyzes the results of the scan and can identify the contents, no matter how well concealed, down the molecular level.

In other words, if a package is selected for inspection, they'll know what it is before even opening it. Packaging is irrelevant. The reason so much gets through is because the volume of packs coming into the US is 4 million a day now, 100 times more than inspection capacity can handle. Thats why they're spending billions on massive high speed, automated, contractor run inspection facilities, the first going online at JFK in January, when I think we're in for a very unpleasant change compared to the current situation.
 
Last edited:
All China packs get inspected and matched to the algorithm of source board forum pic databases didn't you know?
Well, I think someone posted a thread in the Legal Forum about STOCK UP NOW or the like because CBP was implementing new measures to scan incoming packages to combat abuse of the de minimis rule.
 
@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
What other ingredients / filler do you use for the tirz? And is it the same filler material in all your peptides?

I bought 5mg and 10mg kits us domestic. I have no issues with injection but my wife is having a reaction at injection site. Its slightly itchy oval shaped red spot/blotch about 2 inches that appears the next day and will last for 5 to 7 days. We did 3 test shots of just bac water in different locations and no reaction. Thanks

 
A tiny percentage of packages are actually selected for inspection. They're sent through a 6 position density scanner that's not dissimilar to an MRI, The device is connected to a system that analyzes the results of the scan and can identify the contents, no matter how well concealed, down the molecular level.

Why do you keep making up this bullshit?

A six-position density scanner is precisely that. An xray scanner that measures the density of materials inside of a package from a bunch of different angles and generates a composite image. It can identify fuck-all at a molecular level. A vial of MCT oil is going to appear no different than a vial of Test C (in MCT oil).

Density is a clue to the contents, but by no means precise.
 
Here we go again
Why do you keep making up this bullshit?

A six-position density scanner is precisely that. An xray scanner that measures the density of materials inside of a package from a bunch of different angles and generates a composite image. It can identify fuck-all at a molecular level. A vial of MCT oil is going to appear no different than a vial of Test C (in MCT oil).

Density is a clue to the contents, but by no means precise.
It uses magic and AI to scan every molecule coming over the border. It then identifies the recipient, sends a drone to their address, and murders their families. I have no references but just trust me because I argue a lot on forums
 
A minority of people develop antibodies to Tirz. Doesn't impact the effectiveness, but the injection site reaction you describe is the most common effect.

Anti-histamines like Benadryl taken just before or after can help sometimes.

Sometimes it calms down on its own, even if it does, an increased dose will worsen it, at least temporarily.

Greater dilution can help lessen the reaction.

Pharma Tirz uses .5ml for all pen administered doses.

May want to try Sema if it's intolerable.

She started out at 1250mg per week, which worked great(except for the itchy red spot). First batch was 5mg 3 ml water (75 on 1ml syringe) Next batch was 5mg 2ml water (50 on 1ml syringe) Next batch 10mg 3ml water (37 on 1ml syringe) all injections different spots (stomach, love handle, thigh) all have the same site injection red itchy spot. We are going to move up to 2500mg per week and wondering if it will get worse with the larger dose. Only one way to find out...
Someone I'm coaching started having site reactions to tirzepatide. I had them try different batches, different bac water, all to no avail. They had a history of allergic reactions and even tried a prescription antihistamine, but eventually reverted to semaglutide.

Based on anecdotal reports, it seems that site reactions are relatively common with tirzepatide. I could only find maybe one reference in the literature with no real guidance as to how to proceed.
She doesn't have any or had any other allergic reactions to anything that she or I can remember. I was hoping maybe it was the filler (mannitol??) and maybe I could find another supplier that uses something different. There were a few "retail" domestic us companies that sold peptides without mannitol. But it sounds like she is having a reaction to the tirz itself.

Thanks for the responses guys.
 
Back
Top