The cruise vessel
New Member
yes, I agree. The difference though is you still lose weight on reta. I mean the trials don't lie. Even with more appetite.Reta is suppressing the appetite too little, in my opinion...you eat more than when on Tirz and even more than when you're on Sema.
You eat more often, compare to the other two, but less amount of food.
the glucagon is a huge difference maker. It acts as an energy manager. Pulling sugar from the liver and burning adipose fat and releasing ketones.
Tirz and sema don't have this mechanism at all and are essentially just putting on the brakes, (stopping you from eating)
While Reta puts on the brakes a bit but super charges your fuel, so you get better gas mileage.
This is why people get fatigued with sema, reta, cagri and not reta. The glucagon is a super energy manager. Always finding energy.
This is why I will not feel totally suppressed appetite like people talk about with tirz, but I wake up everyday lighter and with smaller waist.
But I can see how having both, the appetite suppression AND the super energy manager of reta would be good


