MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

Highlights Only (24)
a123 said:
QSC is not going to be the cheapest because they have an established userbase. They need to rely on their regulars and referrals to make a profit.

QSC has been dropping to match market but the new guys are always gonna have to come in under. But there's inherent risk and effort ordering from a new source so you gotta decide what's best for you.
Click to expand...

These guys are here to deliver the product as advertised, the bare minimum, and compete on price.

That's why I laugh at those who put so much stock in the proprietors "attitude" and "tone". None of that matters.

Deliver at the best price. Fail to do that, lose the sale.

QSC is in the enviable position of probably being the highest volume of these Chinese sellers, giving him the most clout with the same sources they're all getting their inventory from.

When the shrimps shave their profit margin as they compete for attention they're doing us a favor by prompting QSC to respond, which they can do and still maintain a higher profit margin than the others.

Without competition there'd rarely be a need for price cuts.
 
ksm2 said:
I would ask for 2 extra kits or at least a refund of the overpaid price
Click to expand...
What.. you must of misunderstood me. I am not owed anything. I just received an old price list so I went with a competitor. Had I of received the correct price list I would have ordered here again.
 
hungryalways said:
Has anyone used the QSC Tretinoin? Wondering how easy it to use "homebrew".

Adapalene costs a fortune here, especially when you have to cover your back and chest in it, so was hoping to find an alternative.

Can it simply be weighed on a precision scale and mixed with a moisturising emollient gel?
Click to expand...

With that much surface area to cover, why not Accutane?
 
hungryalways said:
Worried about sides. Particularly loss of BMD as I already have osteopenia.
Click to expand...

Most of the studies from the last decade say loss of bone density doesn't appear to happen, at least in a single course of normal, high dose accutane. The low dose protocols should be even safer.

However Vitamin D absorption is reduced, and its recommend that users take a supplement to compensate.

If I were in your shoes I'd avoid it too, even with the whiff of a possibility of worsening it.

Do you get any of the bone density improving shots? They seem to be really effective, I know a few women getting them.
 
MB101 said:
What.. you must of misunderstood me. I am not owed anything. I just received an old price list so I went with a competitor. Had I of received the correct price list I would have ordered here again.
Click to expand...
We have frequent deals every month, for example the previous GB tirz 10mg, 2 months ago was $165/kit, shipping included.

We are actually the cheapest and we provide the best deal, you just need to jump on them at the right time.

But yes sometimes you need also to try the competitors to get some slaps later when the testing come back and stick to QSC after that !
 
Ghoul said:
Most of the studies from the last decade say loss of bone density doesn't appear to happen, at least in a single course of normal, high dose accutane. The low dose protocols should be even safer.

However Vitamin D absorption is reduced, and its recommend that users take a supplement to compensate.

If I were in your shoes I'd avoid it too, even with the whiff of a possibility of worsening it.

Do you get any of the bone density improving shots? They seem to be really effective, I know a few women getting them.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the info. I may reconsider low dose (<=10mg) if I can't get it under control with topicals.

I'm 6 weeks in on differin gel and a slight improvement, but still breaking out regularly and my back looks pretty bad.

I wasn't offered any of the bone meds due to my age and T-scores not being quite bad enough, but have had some decent success with TRT, HGH and small blasts including NPP and anavar.

Over 1 year since starting I got:

* Spine T-Score: 0.0 -> 0.4
* Femoral Neck T-Score: -2.3 -> -1.7
* Total Hip T-Score: -1.8 -> -1.2

Anyone raised Bone Density with Steroids/HGH/SARMs?

I Glad to hear man. How old are you if you don't mind me asking? Also what were your T-scores before and after? I’m 24 now when I started my t-score was around -3.0 and now it’s at about -1.0 still but low but I’m continuing with it.
thinksteroids.com thinksteroids.com
 
Hello everyone,

I am somehow in a terrible situation, and I need your honest and wise advices regarding the issue.

As you know, I initiated several Group buys, tested first, then I covered the testing costs of volunteers.

For these Group Buys, I announced a +99% purity guarantee.

The first one was Tirzepatide 10mg, here is my test:


Test Report #40786 (1).png

The second one was BPC157 10mg, and here is my test:


Test Report #40785 (2).png

Now, the testing on both came back, sent by volunteers, 8 vials tested:



Test Report #43013.pngTest Report #43014.png

So the BPC157 10mg tests confirmed the results, but the tirz 10mg shows a significant degradation.

When I spoke with Janoshik about the results, he is 70% sure it's just tirzepatide 10mg degraded. Which makes me in a terrible situation between:

Refunding/Reshipping new batch of the Group buy tirz 10mg orders, accepting the loss, but this will imply that either I will have to cancel all the future ones, because it's clearly a gambling game, especially that we have plenty coming and many customers like you are expecting to take advantage of these deals.

Or lowering the standards, assuming that the +99% is something hard to guarantee, since there is no control on the parameters, nor storage conditions, how far and how low can we get down? 97% ? 95% ? lower? and I am sure with the coming summer and heat, won't make things better.. a real paradox..

Or making it simply a group call, the same way it was a group buy, maybe via a poll, making everyone decide weither to decide if they want us to honor the guarantee, compensate them over a batch that tested lower than the guarantee, and stopping the business model, because it's simply not sustainable, nor profitable this way, or accepting the results, lowering the standards, reviewing the community standards, that are clearly to be questionned. Testing from different suppliers shows that the line between the 99% and 98%, even in the same batchs is very thin.

I don't know how to deal with it to be honest..
 
Last edited:
Qingdao Sigma Chemicals said:
Hello everyone,

I am somehow in a terrible situation, and I need your honest and wise advices regarding the issue.

As you know, I initiated several Group buys, tested first, then I covered the testing costs of volunteers.

For these Group Buys, I announced a +99% purity guarantee.

The first one was Tirzepatide 10mg, here is my test:


View attachment 285071

The second one was BPC157 10mg, and here is my test:


View attachment 285072

Now, the testing on both came back, sent by volunteers, 8 vials tested:



View attachment 285074View attachment 285073

So the BPC157 10mg tests confirmed the results, but the tirz 10mg shows a significant degradation.

When I spoke with Janoshik about the results, he suspected at 70% it's just tirzepatide 10mg degraded. Which makes me in a terrible situation between:

Refunding/Reshipping new batch of the Group buy tirz 10mg orders, accepting the loss, but this will imply that either I will have to cancel all the future ones, because it's clearly a gambling game, especially that we have plenty coming and many customers like you are expecting to take advantage of these deals.

Or lowering the standards, assuming that the +99% is something hard to guarantee, since there is no control on the parameters, nor storage conditions, how far and how low can we get down? 97% ? 95% ? lower? and I am sure with the coming summer and heat, won't make things better.. a real paradox..

Or making it simply a group call, the same way it was a group buy, maybe via a poll, making everyone decide weither to decide if they want us to honor the guarantee, compensate them over a batch that tested lower than the guarantee, and stopping the business model, because it's simply not sustainable, nor profitable this way, or accepting the results, lowering the standards, reviewing the community standards, that are clearly to be questionned. Testing from different suppliers shows that the line between the 99% and 98%, even in the same batchs is very thin.

I don't know how to deal with it to be honest..
Click to expand...
Anyone who’s not okay with those results is fucked. I know for a fact there’s gonna be people who are not okay with it and want the replacement which is crazy to me. I would lower purity guarantee and if it doesn’t meet their expectations they can keep it moving.
 
Qingdao Sigma Chemicals said:
Hello everyone,

I am somehow in a terrible situation, and I need your honest and wise advices regarding the issue.

As you know, I initiated several Group buys, tested first, then I covered the testing costs of volunteers.

For these Group Buys, I announced a +99% purity guarantee.

The first one was Tirzepatide 10mg, here is my test:


View attachment 285071

The second one was BPC157 10mg, and here is my test:


View attachment 285072

Now, the testing on both came back, sent by volunteers, 8 vials tested:



View attachment 285074View attachment 285073

So the BPC157 10mg tests confirmed the results, but the tirz 10mg shows a significant degradation.

When I spoke with Janoshik about the results, he suspected at 70% it's just tirzepatide 10mg degraded. Which makes me in a terrible situation between:

Refunding/Reshipping new batch of the Group buy tirz 10mg orders, accepting the loss, but this will imply that either I will have to cancel all the future ones, because it's clearly a gambling game, especially that we have plenty coming and many customers like you are expecting to take advantage of these deals.

Or lowering the standards, assuming that the +99% is something hard to guarantee, since there is no control on the parameters, nor storage conditions, how far and how low can we get down? 97% ? 95% ? lower? and I am sure with the coming summer and heat, won't make things better.. a real paradox..

Or making it simply a group call, the same way it was a group buy, maybe via a poll, making everyone decide weither to decide if they want us to honor the guarantee, compensate them over a batch that tested lower than the guarantee, and stopping the business model, because it's simply not sustainable, nor profitable this way, or accepting the results, lowering the standards, reviewing the community standards, that are clearly to be questionned. Testing from different suppliers shows that the line between the 99% and 98%, even in the same batchs is very thin.

I don't know how to deal with it to be honest..
Click to expand...
He suspected at 70%? What do you mean? 70% of the orders degraded or?
Are we really nit picking 2%? Its overfilled, 97% of 11mg still puts the active above the 10mg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ROİDLY
BexitPharmaceuticals International Peptides
Replies
15
Views
852
ROİDLY
ROİDLY
CreateHGH
CreateHGH - EU domestic HGH, peptides, capsules
Replies
15
Views
2K
dinfar1337
dinfar1337
PrimusAnabolics
PrimusAnabolics EU Domestic
13 14 15
Replies
287
Views
20K
PrimusAnabolics
PrimusAnabolics
Mandy Biotechnology
Mandy Biotechnology - Best services, international, HGH (97%+)
2 3
Replies
55
Views
8K
Jojo.dolo
Jojo.dolo
laikangbiology
Laikang Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Best product services, international transportation)
13 14 15
Replies
290
Views
31K
HVACTitan
H

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top