Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

Any DHT esters available, DHT propionate, DHT enanthate?

Only esterless version is available

 

[Alibabaa]

@Shark88 @peptidewanter @xrayphoton13 @MadaFacor @PoizenNoVA @Alibabaa @Deadp007 @Knitram @UncleBuns @nightprowler7 @HereToTeachAndLearn @Hugh Madbrah @JeffroCat @BigDeee

top test result. keep it up

 

[trengod1992]

@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals any plans to bring the 10k iu Hcg kits to the USA warehouse?

 

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals any plans to bring the 10k iu Hcg kits to the USA warehouse?

When the bulk lines get better, we can bring more stocks to USA, now we wait.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Looks like dimerisation is some kind of degradation of rHGH.
A freshly made batch of HGH will be higher purity, low dimer to zero.
if tested later, % of dimer increases and purity decreases.

even then, that dimer seems to be pretty negligent.

 

[runway]

Only esterless version is available

Aren't you afraid QSC rivals will bring esterfied DHT and destroy the Qingdao forever?

 

[PoizenNoVA]

@Shark88 @peptidewanter @xrayphoton13 @MadaFacor @PoizenNoVA @Alibabaa @Deadp007 @Knitram @UncleBuns @nightprowler7 @HereToTeachAndLearn @Hugh Madbrah @JeffroCat @BigDeee

Thank you for the ping, Tracy. Kain shared this in Discord earlier. I wouldn't lump me in with the "haters". I still hope QSC resolves its issues and becomes a top source again.

 

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

Thank you for the ping, Tracy. Kain shared this in Discord earlier. I wouldn't lump me in with the "haters". I still hope QSC resolves its issues and becomes a top source again.

No man, I know you were just sharing that report which was an honest move.

QSC is working our best to resolve all the past issues, and we believe that things now are way much better.

 

[Spaceman Spiff]

Aren't you afraid QSC rivals will bring esterfied DHT and destroy the Qingdao forever?

I am pretty sure 99% of gear users dont care about esterified DHT

 

[Zeromercurial]

Is there gonna be a promo today?

 

[roofer22]

Is there gonna be a promo today?

I think he said Thursday.

 

[Middus]

There is a strange phenomenon in the Rx world where *sometimes* name brand drugs are better or worse for people than the generics. I don't know if it's placebo or what because if the drug and dose are the same, it shouldn't be different, but a lot of people swear it is.

Most common example of this I've seen is Synthroid vs Levothyroxine. For some reason there are a ton of people who can only take one or the other without getting negative side effects. Placebo is a helluva a drug though so it's also possible that the doctor or pharmacy telling someone "you're taking the cheaper stuff" could contribute to that.

Anecdotally, sometimes the difference in sensation/response may be due to delivery system of the drug i.e 'inert' fillers that are not exactly inert, constituents e.t.c. I know people that react differently to generic acetaminophen vs Tylenol. The latter always giving a sensation of the pill being stuck in the throat.. That slight difference is enough to tilt preference.

 

[Vinyard]

Thanks for sharing.
I guess I was right when I said that those donnors in that discord group cannot be trusted.
I know that many of them are good customers and trustworthy, but unfortunately I have so much haters there who try to sully QSC reputation by all possible means, especially in reddit comments, and it often surprise me that I find sometimes they are testing some kits with some color of tops that were never produced by QSC.
That vial definitely didn't belong to us, 93% purity, large difference on quantity, that was a clear dishonest sample donation.

This is a ridiculous response. Multiple times you have talked about "lucky" and "unlucky" vials. Maybe that discord members sample was an "unlucky" one? How would you even know how many vials of yours would come in lower? You send a single sample of gh, when every other reputable vendor, such as K4L, Opti, TP etc, sends multiple of each batch to get a good average since there is definitely a variance from vial to vial.

Each extra vial is only $100 for purity and dimer, everyone else does it but you won't. And then you discredit people who tested your stuff when it comes back bad. From what I understand, at least 4 more vials were sent from those kits for retesting to see if it was just an "unlucky" vial like you talk about.

Anyways, my CNY gh came in and I had a special case made just for it....

 

[runway]

I am pretty sure 99% of gear users dont care about esterified DHT

Because no one offered it ever

 

[Lukeyybrown]

Will HGH be on promo?

 

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

This is a ridiculous response. Multiple times you have talked about "lucky" and "unlucky" vials. Maybe that discord members sample was an "unlucky" one? How would you even know how many vials of yours would come in lower? You send a single sample of gh, when every other reputable vendor, such as K4L, Opti, TP etc, sends multiple of each batch to get a good average since there is definitely a variance from vial to vial.

Each extra vial is only $100 for purity and dimer, everyone else does it but you won't. And then you discredit people who tested your stuff when it comes back bad. From what I understand, at least 4 more vials were sent from those kits for retesting to see if it was just an "unlucky" vial like you talk about.

Anyways, my CNY gh came in and I had a special case made just for it....

When we talked about lucky and unlucky vials, it was a discussion about HGH ranging between 96% and 99% and yes purity can be different from a vial to another, it affects the quantity very slightly.

The proof is that variance between those recently tested vials is very minimum. VS the lady vial that tested with an unusual purity value of HGH that was never seen for more than a year and for a quantity that is far away from the other vials tested. If it doesn't raise questions for you especially after this recent testing and you believe my answer is ridiculous, then believe what do you want.

Instead of being grateful to what you got at very cheap price and tested and being fair to the supplier who did his homework by testing, and his testing was confirmed by blind testing, you prefer to trust an anonymous shady lady, in a group full of haters and redditors.

We used to do variance testing in the first batchs we sent of HGH, not worth it, results are often very close.

 

[UncleBuns]

Still planning for 5k IU HCG? What mg per vial will the TB/BPC mix vials be?

 

[Ex0shear]

When we talked about lucky and unlucky vials, it was a discussion about HGH ranging between 96% and 99% and yes purity can be different from a vial to another, it affects the quantity very slightly.

The proof is that variance between those recently tested vials is very minimum. VS the lady vial that tested with an unusual purity value of HGH that was never seen for more than a year and for a quantity that is far away from the other vials tested. If it doesn't raise questions for you especially after this recent testing and you believe my answer is ridiculous, then believe what do you want.

Instead of being fair to the supplier who did his homework by testing, and his testing was confirmed by blind testing, you prefer to trust an anonymous lady, in a group full of haters.

We used to do variance testing in the first batchs we sent of HGH, not worth it, results are often very close.

I can't believe how you completely ignored the vial case. Thoughts?

 

[Qingdao Sigma Chemicals]

I can't believe how you completely ignored the vial case. Thoughts?

What do you mean by ignored? what am I supposed to do?

 

[Vinyard]

When we talked about lucky and unlucky vials, it was a discussion about HGH ranging between 96% and 99% and yes purity can be different from a vial to another, it affects the quantity very slightly.

The proof is that variance between those recently tested vials is very minimum. VS the lady vial that tested with an unusual purity value of HGH that was never seen for more than a year and for a quantity that is far away from the other vials tested. If it doesn't raise questions for you especially after this recent testing and you believe my answer is ridiculous, then believe what do you want.

Instead of being grateful to what you got at very cheap price and tested and being fair to the supplier who did his homework by testing, and his testing was confirmed by blind testing, you prefer to trust an anonymous shady lady, in a group full of haters and redditors.

We used to do variance testing in the first batchs we sent of HGH, not worth it, results are often very close.

If there's any tests I question it's vendors tests. If yours were perfect I wouldn't have thrown out over 30 kits of multiple peptides that either tested as being contaminated with sema or something completely different than I ordered. The tests you had posted on your price list at the time definitely didn't show that. But I do appreciate that you are honest and up front about bad tests now. That is a massive improvement over the way things were done in October and November.