ghostpharma
New Member
Received the domestic half of my order in less than 5 business days from purchase. Other half (international) in transit.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic
- Thread starter Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
- Start date
Was the Test C that was measured at 225mg gold topped?
DB_636
Member
Mine are purple...I never got a response what color the 255mg tops were.
The purple is 255mg.
I’m just trying to get confirmation that Test C used to come in gold tops and those were the ones that measured out at 225mg.
DB_636
Member
Negative, my purple tops tested at 225mg.
DB_636
Member
Are you saying this batch was tested at 255mg?
Guys, old batch was very light purple where u can look through the tops (tested at 225mg/ml), new batch has very dark purple tops (255mg/ml). Don't mix them up. There's different purple color tops.
I received a pack very recently that was supposed to be Test C and they were gold tops. Are you telling me there was a mix up?
txhero
Member
this UGL sometimes has the exact same color caps for a while for each product; however, you cannot count on product identification by the Color cap or what is posted in this forum thread. Many times they are correct; however, the best way to be sure what you're getting is to email @Qingdao Sigma Chemicals and provide the numbers on each package and if there's not a number on some packages, let them know that as well. QSC will then identify with your product. this way you know what you got.
TxHero
I received Test C that had gold caps as well from an order I placed in mid to late April. I got them last weekend.
So I’m not sure what’s suppose to be the latest batch and if the cap colors even mean beyond the individual orders.
It’d be nice to know if my test c was tested at 225 or 255. I was assuming 225 before this new test was posted.
DB_636
Member
Only cost you $120 to have absolute certainty on identification and potency. Well worth it imo.
Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
Subscriber
The question is what does it change the 5% you are debating on? unless you are some women with low T levels needing to dose 10mg a week, Idk if the 25mg/ml difference will change something in your gains, sometimes most of you focus on the chemistery and mgs counting and forget you are doing this for bodybuilding to get huge, and build muscles, not to count mgs.
Hey man, we're counting pennies instead of the whole bag lol. But seriously, you have to understand most of the community is anal on such details, hence why we are attracted to this lifestyle in the first place.
Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
Subscriber
Got you man, I am a user too, but 120 USD over some 5% difference on test dosage, that's maybe 10 meals of good quality fish to add to my diet as bodybuilder.
Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
Subscriber
DHB raws expected next week, the oils will follow after that
It's not about the money at all for me because I'd be saving nothing really.
I'm planning a cycle later in the year/early next year that's going to be 3MLs of Test and 2.5 MLs of your Primo a week. 25mg of variance a ML adds up when the quantity increases.
I just wanted to see if someone knew if the gold top Test C vials I received last week were tested at 225 or 250. I'm not dying over here. I'm pleased with the stuff I received and will be back for more.
Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
Subscriber
NAD+ raw Janoshik results
Code:
https://janoshik.com/tests/29316-NAD_FXFYY9Q8M3ERAs far as I know this is the first lab test report published in Meso RX of NAD+, it's an expensive test, that required from @janoshik extra free test to indentify the impurity, and his conclusion:
"NAD is very hygroscopic (likes to attract water) so I suspected the remaining purity % is just the water it absorbed from air moisture.
The measurement confirmed what I have thought. (see comment)
Hope I helped."
So a big thanks for the extra free thanks to @janoshik who put on light the question of NAD+ storage and brewing.
I did on my end also some reading, as many members suggested NAD+ solutions, which is a very bad idea, NAD+ is very hygroscopic and should be stored desiccated. For example in an anhydrous gas such as Nitrogen, or vaccum sealed bags like what we do for isotretinoine and tretinoin storage in our warehouse, far from the light.
Aqueous solutions between pH 2 - 6, stored as single-use aliquots at -70 °C, are stable for at least 6 months.
Neutral or slightly acidic solutions are stable at 0 °C for at least 2 weeks.
Solutions are rapidly degraded upon heating and are very labile in alkaline solutions, especially in the presence of phosphate, maleate, or carbonate.
The rates of degradation of solutions at different pH and temperature conditions have been reported. Solutions are also sensitive to light.
So I guess the best idea for NAD+ use is to use it in freeze dried powder form that we plan to make, maybe targeting 100mg vials, 10 vials per kit, to avoid long use (over 2 weeks).
I think that is the best answer right there. One of you guys who had the golden tops could just send it in for testing.
On the other hand I personally dont mind if it's 225 or 255mg/ml. As you can tell by the picture I posted I use both batches. Who cares as long as it is within pharmaceutical standards (-+10% dose range).
Similar threads
