Dont do that. It will go bad once reconstituted and left in the fridge for 2 months. Up to 7 days is fine in the fridge. If you reconstitute it and leave it in the fridge for 2 months, it will likely degrade and lose a lot of potency.
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic
- Thread starter Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
- Start date
haha
New Member
will you guys ever increase the concentration of l-carnitine like something like 500mg/mL?
verbatim83
New Member
Anyone here have experience with Bold Cyp and or specifically QSC Bold Cyp?
D
Deleted member 134759
Guest
Try downloading the price list like everyone else you lazy fuck
AnyoneUS domestic injectable oils price list
check how beautiful
Is test pp better than test p if I’m injecting eod? Or does it really matter ?US domestic injectable oils price list
check how beautiful
D
Deleted member 134759
Guest
Can I pre order the bold c
Qingdao Sigma Chemicals
Subscriber
Yes you can
Wha
What do you want for this money? To be crystal clear
They dont print batch numbers inside anymore. And my hgh was fine when I reconstituted it with bac water.
oh okay, i didnt know that
anyone has experience if you can just take the NAD+ powder sublingually?
i would assume so since there are no fillers etc used, correct?
i assume taking NAD+ is superior to taking its precursor NMN?
thanks for your opinion guys!
@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals : is there any internal lab test done for purity of those two? (esp NAD+)
thanks!
I don't think NAD+ is superior to sublingual NMN. I think NAD+ is the choice if you are going to make an intravenous solution for injection etc. For the price, NMN is probably the better choice.
These substances are hard to produce and hard to store properly. Testing is a must.
Will happily post my generic GH supported physique. Not QSCs, but generic none the less. Then what?
why do you think so?
NMN is the precursor to NAD+
using NAD+ directly should be superior if sublingual works with raw powder
or what am i missing?
bloke
Member
If I remember correctly NAD+ is too large to penetrate the cell walls. The precursors NMN or NR can penetrate the cell walls and will be converted to NAD+. Finding good info on this subject is too much although I would try a NAD+ or NADH injectable if one was produced. Tested raws would greatly inspire confidence and probably push sales even higher. If this is produced as an injectable version, tests would go a long way and drive sales higher. Even better if it's possible to do subq since a lot of people get spooked at the size of IM needles.why do you think so?
NMN is the precursor to NAD+
using NAD+ directly should be superior if sublingual works with raw powder
or what am i missing?
I forget the exact mechanism this second, but it is a situation where taking the precursor to the substance you want, can be more effective than taking the substance itself.why do you think so?
NMN is the precursor to NAD+
using NAD+ directly should be superior if sublingual works with raw powder
or what am i missing?
It's kind of like when you take glutathione orally. Your body doesn't use oral glutathione as glutathione, it's absorption isn't great, it does little to raise glutathione levels. But if you take a precursor to glutathione like NAC, the precursor is then superior, because the body uses it to directly produce glutathione, with nothing lost in the process.
So there is a line of thinking that NMN as a precursor is more effective than the NAD+ itself.
But no one is sure about any of this. And I can't remember the exact mechanism. I'll look later.
Similar threads
