MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

So........because i don't understand the mechanism behind primo lowering e2, then primo didn't lower my e2? I think you might be conflating what primo does, against AAS/Meso users' ability to explain the biological process (which we are mostly not educated to do). The two are quite orthogonal and the lack of explanation doesn't negate real exeriences.

Personally, i don't believe that my e2 suddenly dropped to zero the first time i took primo, when it had never happened before. Sure correllation doesn't imply causation, but at some point i also don't think some other magic happened that im unaware of that measurably dropped my e2.

I think the doubt might be limited to you, my friend. That's OK. You're allowed to believe what you want to believe. I stand in the camp of play careful with Primo because fucking your e2 will make you miserable.

Hope you don't think that makes me an asshole endangering people.
You're e2 dropped to 0. Am I really supposed to take you at your word?
 
How can you say that it doesn't work to help lower E2 when there's several people that say that it does ? (Through BLOODWORK no less) Primo doesn't aromatize to estrogen, but can functionally lower estrogenic activity for many users, maybe it doesn't work for you, that's not to say it doesn't work for somebody else, everybody responds differently to certain things for you to outright say that it doesn't is just stupidity at its finest, you're always on here having some kind of confrontation with somebody, I think you have a closed mind. Why don't you you STFU
Because all 10 of you might have zero ability to account for all variables that might contribute to your bloodwork being what it is.

Again, it's not that you can't describe the mechanism. You yourself won't even state that it lowers e2 reliably in most people (using X dose of drugs 1, 2, and 3 and who knows what else, for t length of time, none the less). Your own confidence in your assertion is flimsy and any suggestion that this happens from you should probably be followed up with something like "but what the hell do I know?"
 
Because all 10 of you might have zero ability to account for all variables that might contribute to your bloodwork being what it is.

Again, it's not that you can't describe the mechanism. You yourself won't even state that it lowers e2 reliably in most people (using X dose of drugs 1, 2, and 3 and who knows what else, for t length of time, none the less). Your own confidence in your assertion is flimsy and any suggestion that this happens from you should probably be followed up with something like "but what the hell do I know?"
Agreed- lots of variables. "That's why we look at patterns and data, not disclaimers".
 

Sponsors

Back
Top