MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

Everyone complaining about this. I wanna throw this out there! 2 year ago I sent in a ML of my dr prescribed 200mg/ml test C!!! Well guess u guys gonna be heart broke! Came back at 178!!! That is supposedly pharma grade! If it says 250 and I’m getting 240 I am fine!
 
Everyone complaining about this. I wanna throw this out there! 2 year ago I sent in a ML of my dr prescribed 200mg/ml test C!!! Well guess u guys gonna be heart broke! Came back at 178!!! That is supposedly pharma grade! If it says 250 and I’m getting 240 I am fine!
Was this a compounding pharmacy? Their standards and variances are worse than many UGLs.
 
Everyone complaining about this. I wanna throw this out there! 2 year ago I sent in a ML of my dr prescribed 200mg/ml test C!!! Well guess u guys gonna be heart broke! Came back at 178!!! That is supposedly pharma grade! If it says 250 and I’m getting 240 I am fine!
Encouraging a higher standard isn't complaining and something else being worse in comparison doesn't mean we should lower said standard.
 
Everyone complaining about this. I wanna throw this out there! 2 year ago I sent in a ML of my dr prescribed 200mg/ml test C!!! Well guess u guys gonna be heart broke! Came back at 178!!! That is supposedly pharma grade! If it says 250 and I’m getting 240 I am fine!
That’s not the point. You have multiple vials with different variances. I mean we have a 230 something and now a 260 something. Who’s to say there isn’t a 220 something out there. Do you want your tren or ment overdosed or from a health perspective would it be better if they are a bit more accurate? Be honest. Yeah it’s test and it’s more about the process as a whole not the 239 that supposed to be 250. It’s a bigger picture. I mean a lot of guys are just buying up to resell to gym bros anyway so maybe no biggie. But some of us arent. Just a process thing to me when these variances aren’t seen in other UGLs at this consistent of a basis.
 
That’s not the point. You have multiple vials with different variances. I mean we have a 230 something and now a 260 something. Who’s to say there isn’t a 220 something out there. Do you want your tren or ment overdosed or from a health perspective would it be better if they are a bit more accurate? Be honest. Yeah it’s test and it’s more about the process as a whole not the 239 that supposed to be 250. It’s a bigger picture. I mean a lot of guys are just buying up to resell to gym bros anyway so maybe no biggie. But some of us arent. Just a process thing to me when these variances aren’t seen in other UGLs at this consistent of a basis.
I guess only safe way is maybe do your own. Then one person to blame! Especially with raws testing off also. Tolerance on test difference and Tren and ment are 2 different things. One im not gonna take Tren. lol u can get away with it on test. Aggravating I know but whole hung even with Pharma is they all miss
 
Everyone complaining about this. I wanna throw this out there! 2 year ago I sent in a ML of my dr prescribed 200mg/ml test C!!! Well guess u guys gonna be heart broke! Came back at 178!!! That is supposedly pharma grade! If it says 250 and I’m getting 240 I am fine!
But what if you buy 250 and get 220 one time and 260 another time. Unless you test every single vial, you have no clue what your dosage is. Let’s not start trying to excuse the inconsistency here, when reasonable accuracy and consistency has been proven elsewhere.

They have said they are doing things to improve on this. @Primal_Pharma when do you think we can expect these changes to provide more consistent results.
 
I guess only safe way is maybe do your own. Then one person to blame! Especially with raws testing off also. Tolerance on test difference and Tren and ment are 2 different things. One im not gonna take Tren. lol u can get away with it on test. Aggravating I know but whole hung even with Pharma is they all miss
Well if you test raws before you brew you can calculate that out to get close. Anyway, dead horse time to move on. My bad for getting folks riled up this morning. Hope everyone has a great holiday whatever it is you celebrate and may your gains be merry and bright
 
But what if you buy 250 and get 220 one time and 260 another time. Unless you test every single vial, you have no clue what your dosage is. Let’s not start trying to excuse the inconsistency here, when it’s been reasonable accuracy and consistency has been proven elsewhere.

They have said they are doing things to improve on this. @Primal_Pharma when do you think we can expect these changes to provide more consistent results.
You’re exactly right but am I gonna test my dr prescribed every time !! Heck no! They have excuses just like rest. Point is none of us have Time or money to test every vial. I run 1ml my prescribed test and .5 of test c primal
Pretty much consistently last 6 months and my levels in last 2 blood panels was 1780 and 1730. Both done at 8:30 in morn with injection at 8 the morning before. I agree a lot with hay u guys are saying but we expecting better than a pharmacy here?
 
Well if you test raws before you brew you can calculate that out to get close. Anyway, dead horse time to move on. My bad for getting folks riled up this morning. Hope everyone has a great holiday whatever it is you celebrate and may your gains be merry and bright
Your all good brother not argue here just saying man we expecting better than pharma and primal prob sale more than pharma lol
 
That’s not the point. You have multiple vials with different variances. I mean we have a 230 something and now a 260 something. Who’s to say there isn’t a 220 something out there. Do you want your tren or ment overdosed or from a health perspective would it be better if they are a bit more accurate? Be honest. Yeah it’s test and it’s more about the process as a whole not the 239 that supposed to be 250. It’s a bigger picture. I mean a lot of guys are just buying up to resell to gym bros anyway so maybe no biggie. But some of us arent. Just a process thing to me when these variances aren’t seen in other UGLs at this consistent of a basis.
There’s other vendors that are spot on, I buy from them. It’s simple
 
. I agree a lot with hay u guys are saying but we expecting better than a pharmacy here?
2-3% variance batch to batch easily achievable. Yes, that is what we should expect. Math was shared above. Yes, that is what you get with pharma or better. USP specs are just that, spec limits. That's not what is in the vials.
 
Back
Top