Pharmacom Labs | TEST-E500 | 2025-04 | Janoshik

RThoads

Subscriber
10+ Year Member
PHARMA TEST E500: Testosterone Enanthate 500 from Pharmacom Labs

Analytic testing performed by Janoshik.

RESULTS:
5ZXMrYp.jpg

1. Qualitative analysis: the sample contains the active ingredient Testosterone Enanthate.
2. Quantitative analysis showed the content of active ingredient: 463.90 mg/mL.

Analysis conducted: 14 April 2025
 
It doesn’t look like you test your raws. The result is disappointing, especially since you’re charging double what other labs do for so called "premium quality".
 
not a very good result I would say
It doesn’t look like you test your raws. The result is disappointing, especially since you’re charging double what other labs do for so called "premium quality".
Thank you for taking a look. I'm just sharing the information that I have; it's up to you to decide how you feel about the result and if you like it or not.

Here is the math: 463.90/500 = 0.9278

93% of label claim is well within the +/- 10% standard acceptable range.
Therefore this result is considered a pass and a good product.

+/- 10% of label claim is the same standard the AnabolicLab project and others have used, and is widely considered an acceptable standard.

Also, the quality of a product is not only about the concentration of active agent. But to each his or her own -- everyone is free to make their own choices regarding what they may put into their body.

Nonetheless, as I have said before, regardless of opinions about pass or fail, the most important things are transparency, having real data, and honesty.

Here you clearly see that If I have access to a result, I will post it for the community regardless of how some people may feel about the result.

Testing is done to get real data and show the truth about what is in a product. It would be easy for some people to hand pick only the best samples and results to share, but that's not very helpful or good for the community; therefore, I'm committed to sharing all the results that I can, not just the best results.

I hope this level of integrity and honesty will mean something to people and be respected.
 
EO used ?
Someone who tried these without PIP ?
This sub-forum is exclusively for the discussion of analytic results.
Therefore, I will reply to your question in a more appropriate location (I will quote and tag you).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top