OEP LABS Domestic

[OEP LABS]

I remember who is good at reading these reports hopefully they don't get upset tagging them @Photon and @Sampei

 

[Sampei]

I remember who is good at reading these reports hopefully they don't get upset tagging them @Photon and @Sampei

Let me get home and on a PC and I'll have a look into it, @dinfar1337 can be of help too

 

[OEP LABS]

Let me get home and on a PC and I'll have a look into it, @dinfar1337 can be of help too

Thank you Sir

 

[Sampei]

there is nothing odd in my opinion, the ment ace especially is super clean. the TD gcms is expected to be like that with a purity of 85% (if i remember correctly)

 

[TRM4451]

I absolutely love Ment in both variations but it is easier to acquire the short ester obviously. You can check my history when I was a member to validate that statement. So guess I'm a little bias to it. Imagine if I was that way with PrimoE heck it already be on the list lol. jk!

It is true i have thing for Trestolone, I'll relax on it though, however you'd be surprised the amount folks who also love it but don't say much. Like a secret cult, we will keep it quiet though not wreck the parry All Good I got you fellas

My curiosity is gonna win this battle, I’ll report back if I love or hate it haha

 

[OEP LABS]

there is nothing odd in my opinion, the ment ace especially is super clean. the TD gcms is expected to be like that with a purity of 85% (if i remember correctly)

going to try not to confuse you

That's thing Samp about 1-2 pages back i posted a report states approx.. 64 percent or so on part on part 1/4 of this TD Batch. Now I took the sample from the melted parted of the TD thinking it be the same from overall. From my understanding it is not though. Jano had told it shouldn't melt okay the previous sample that's tested 84% i took from the hardened heart of the center. It also had several melted areas.

Prior to receiving that report, new TD material landed. So the small 1/4 size was combined with the larger TD that landed. Then Compounded using previous history reports then sent to Jano as finished oil for screening GCMS for anything harmful or that should not be there so to speak.

After viewing the GCMS reports it almost appears Batch 2 looks cleaner than Batch 1 in regards to impurities. However not an expert on those reports more why tagged you and photon for guidance.

 

[TanFishMan]

What is your calculated purity for TD 500 batch 2? Did you assume 85% and do a 5% overdose? If you used 1.2x raws and it tested at 550mg/ml, there is no way the purity is only 65%.

 

[DeltaFox]

going to try not to confuse you

That's thing Samp about 1-2 pages back i posted a report states approx.. 64 percent or so on part on part 1/4 of this TD Batch. Now I took the sample from the melted parted of the TD thinking it be the same from overall. From my understanding it is not though. Jano had told it shouldn't melt okay the previous sample that's tested 84% i took from the hardened heart of the center. It also had several melted areas.

Prior to receiving that report, new TD material landed. So the small 1/4 size was combined with the larger TD that landed. Then Compounded using previous history reports then sent to Jano as finished oil for screening GCMS for anything harmful or that should not be there so to speak.

After viewing the GCMS reports it almost appears Batch 2 looks cleaner than Batch 1 in regards to impurities. However not an expert on those reports more why tagged you and photon for guidance.

I’m guessing the sample that tested at 64% was not homogenized. Not an expert, but I don’t see anything concerning on the finished oil GCMS.

 

[Sampei]

going to try not to confuse you

That's thing Samp about 1-2 pages back i posted a report states approx.. 64 percent or so on part on part 1/4 of this TD Batch. Now I took the sample from the melted parted of the TD thinking it be the same from overall. From my understanding it is not though. Jano had told it shouldn't melt okay the previous sample that's tested 84% i took from the hardened heart of the center. It also had several melted areas.

Prior to receiving that report, new TD material landed. So the small 1/4 size was combined with the larger TD that landed. Then Compounded using previous history reports then sent to Jano as finished oil for screening GCMS for anything harmful or that should not be there so to speak.

After viewing the GCMS reports it almost appears Batch 2 looks cleaner than Batch 1 in regards to impurities. However not an expert on those reports more why tagged you and photon for guidance.

it looks fine, I have seen similar gcms of raws testing 90+ %,
nothing strange comes up in yours, however we never know what it can't be searched on a GCMS (elude the test) but I would use it, seems like the low purity is just bad synthesis and degraded product nothing harmful that we can see is in there.

 

[loganmiller530]

has there been a jano result for the new batch of test u yet? I'm looking not seeing it anywhere

 

[OEP LABS]

it looks fine, I have seen similar gcms of raws testing 90+ %,
nothing strange comes up in yours, however we never know what it can't be searched on a GCMS (elude the test) but I would use it, seems like the low purity is just bad synthesis and degraded product nothing harmful that we can see is in there.

Thank you for taking the time to review it Sir its appreciated. Not going to lie still a bit torn on which direction to go

has there been a jano result for the new batch of test u yet? I'm looking not seeing it anywhere

The sample for hplc Test is with Jano boss no rush delivery was paid on that so we got a few more days to go its coming though not too worry.


@Oldhand, and others a hint of guidance. The ambiguity had me think on this one a bit longer more so with a GCMS report that presents well. However, reaching out to you all and so far out of many only a handful have voiced. Reassurance I assume is all, but shortly I'm going to make the call myself and well... it will disappear from the list

 

[loganmiller530]

Thank you for taking the time to review it Sir its appreciated. Not going to lie still a bit torn on which direction to go

The sample for hplc Test is with Jano boss no rush delivery was paid on that so we got a few more days to go its coming though not too worry.


@Oldhand, and others a hint of guidance. The ambiguity had me think on this one a bit longer more so with a GCMS report that presents well. However, reaching out to you all and so far out of many only a handful have voiced. Reassurance I assume is all, but shortly I'm going to make the call myself and well... it will disappear from the list

thanks

 

[Sampei]

Thank you for taking the time to review it Sir its appreciated. Not going to lie still a bit torn on which direction to go

The sample for hplc Test is with Jano boss no rush delivery was paid on that so we got a few more days to go its coming though not too worry.


@Oldhand, and others a hint of guidance. The ambiguity had me think on this one a bit longer more so with a GCMS report that presents well. However, reaching out to you all and so far out of many only a handful have voiced. Reassurance I assume is all, but shortly I'm going to make the call myself and well... it will disappear from the list

Pench in the end I would let your customer decide with their money. You gave them the info, they can make an informed decision, you spent the money on the tests, you are more than half there, brew it and call it a day, if you can get better test D in the meantime, you can always then throw the remaining one and offer new batch but right now not many options.

Your clients are aware, not like you are hiding it.

 

[OEP LABS]

Pench in the end I would let your customer decide with their money. You gave them the info, they can make an informed decision, you spent the money on the tests, you are more than half there, brew it and call it a day, if you can get better test D in the meantime, you can always then throw the remaining one and offer new batch but right now not many options.

Your clients are aware, not like you are hiding it.

That is fair valid statement @Sampei. Thank you

 

[Ryan Veneficus]

Pench in the end I would let your customer decide with their money. You gave them the info, they can make an informed decision, you spent the money on the tests, you are more than half there, brew it and call it a day, if you can get better test D in the meantime, you can always then throw the remaining one and offer new batch but right now not many options.

Your clients are aware, not like you are hiding it.

I agree, @OEP LABS . With all the untested gear many of us have used in the past, I'm sure we've all pinned far worse product.
With nothing sticking out as toxic, it's probably fine.
I'll buy some. I'm sure many will. If we know what the tests say and are willing to try it, I'd say go forward with it. Maybe raise the purchase limit to 10 so that those that are fine with the results can buy up more to make up for those that aren't willing to buy it.
Just a thought.